ABSTRACT Obliquely striated muscles occur in 17+ phyla, likely evolving repeatedly, yet the implications of oblique striation for muscle function are unknown. Contrary to the belief that oblique striation allows high force output over extraordinary length ranges (i.e. superelongation), recent work suggests diversity in operating length ranges and length–force relationships. We hypothesize oblique striation evolved to increase length–force relationship flexibility. We predict that superelongation is not a general characteristic of obliquely striated muscles and instead that length–force relationships vary with operating length range. To test these predictions, we measured length–force relationships of five obliquely striated muscles from inshore longfin squid, Doryteuthis pealeii: tentacle, funnel retractor and head retractor longitudinal fibers, and arm and fin transverse fibers. Consistent with superelongation, the tentacle length–force relationship had a long descending limb, whereas all others exhibited limited descending limbs. The ascending limb at 0.6P0 was significantly broader (P<0.001) for the tentacle length–force relationship (0.43±0.04L0; where L0 is the preparation length that produced peak isometric stress, P0) than for the arm (0.29±0.03L0), head retractor (0.24±0.06L0), fin (0.20±0.04L0) and funnel retractor (0.27±0.03L0). The fin's narrow ascending limb differed significantly from those of the arm (P=0.004) and funnel retractor (P=0.012). We further characterized the tentacle preparation's maximum isometric stress (315±78 kPa), maximum unloaded shortening velocity (2.97±0.55L0 s−1) and ultrastructural traits (compared with the arm), which may explain its broader length–force relationship. Comparison of obliquely striated muscles across taxa revealed length–force relationship diversity, with only two species exhibiting superelongation.
more »
« less
Assessing Fit in Structural Equation Models: A Monte-Carlo Evaluation of RMSEA Versus SRMR Confidence Intervals and Tests of Close Fit
- Award ID(s):
- 1659936
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10062422
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
- Volume:
- 25
- Issue:
- 3
- ISSN:
- 1070-5511
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 389 to 402
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
null (Ed.)We examine the accuracy of p values obtained using the asymptotic mean and variance (MV) correction to the distribution of the sample standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) proposed by Maydeu-Olivares to assess the exact fit of SEM models. In a simulation study, we found that under normality, the MV-corrected SRMR statistic provides reasonably accurate Type I errors even in small samples and for large models, clearly outperforming the current standard, that is, the likelihood ratio (LR) test. When data shows excess kurtosis, MV-corrected SRMR p values are only accurate in small models ( p = 10), or in medium-sized models ( p = 30) if no skewness is present and sample sizes are at least 500. Overall, when data are not normal, the MV-corrected LR test seems to outperform the MV-corrected SRMR. We elaborate on these findings by showing that the asymptotic approximation to the mean of the SRMR sampling distribution is quite accurate, while the asymptotic approximation to the standard deviation is not.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)We examined the effect of estimation methods, maximum likelihood (ML), unweighted least squares (ULS), and diagonally weighted least squares (DWLS), on three population SEM (structural equation modeling) fit indices: the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), the comparative fit index (CFI), and the standardized root mean square residual (SRMR). We considered different types and levels of misspecification in factor analysis models: misspecified dimensionality, omitting cross-loadings, and ignoring residual correlations. Estimation methods had substantial impacts on the RMSEA and CFI so that different cutoff values need to be employed for different estimators. In contrast, SRMR is robust to the method used to estimate the model parameters. The same criterion can be applied at the population level when using the SRMR to evaluate model fit, regardless of the choice of estimation method.more » « less
-
more » « less
Amputees’ preferences for prosthesis settings are critical not only for their psychological well-being but also for long-term adherence to device adoption and health. Although active lower-limb prostheses can provide enhanced functionality than passive devices, little is known about the mechanism of preferences for settings in active devices. Therefore, a think-aloud study was conducted on three amputees to unravel their preferences for a powered robotic knee prosthesis during user-guided auto-tuning. The inductive thematic analysis revealed that amputee patients were more likely to use their own passive device rather than the intact leg as the reference for the natural walking that they were looking for in the powered device. There were large individual differences in factors influencing naturalness. The mental optimization of preference decisions was mostly based on the noticeableness of the differences between knee profiles. The implications on future design and research in active prostheses were discussed.
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1389611
