More Like this

1. Evolutionary tracking is determined by differential selection on demographic rates and density dependence

   https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6311  

   Vinton, Anna Christina ; Vasseur, David Alan ( June 2020 , Ecology and Evolution)
2. Delayed effects of climate on vital rates lead to demographic divergence in Amazonian forest fragments

   https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15900  

   Scott, Eric R. ; Uriarte, María ; Bruna, Emilio M. ( January 2022 , Global Change Biology)
3. Are demographic correlates of white‐faced capuchin monkey ( Cebus capucinus ) “Gargle and Twargle” vocalization rates consistent with the infanticide risk assessment hypothesis?

   https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23344  

   Duchesneau, Alexa ; Edelberg, Daniel G. ; Perry, Susan E. ( January 2022 , American Journal of Primatology)
4. Statistical Methods for Assessing Differences in False Non-Match Rates Across Demographic Groups

   Schuckers, ME ( August 2022 , Proceedings of the Understanding and Mitigating Demographic Bias in Biometric Systems(UMDBB) Workshop of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition)
5. Statistical Methods for Assessing Differences in False Non-Match Rates Across Demographic Groups

   Schuckers, M. ( August 2022 , 2022 International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR))

   Biometric recognition is used across a variety of applications from cyber security to border security. Recent research has focused on ensuring biometric performance (false negatives and false positives) is fair across demographic groups. While there has been significant progress on the development of metrics, the evaluation of the performance across groups, and the mitigation of any problems, there has been little work incorporating statistical variation. This is important because differences among groups can be found by chance when no difference is present. In statistics this is called a Type I error. Differences among groups may be due to sampling variation or they may be due to actual difference in system performance. Discriminating between these two sources of error is essential for good decision making about fairness and equity. This paper presents two novel statistical approaches for assessing fairness across demographic groups. The first methodology is a bootstrapped-based hypothesis test, while the second is simpler test methodology focused upon non-statistical audience. For the latter we present the results of a simulation study about the relationship between the margin of error and factors such as number of subjects, number of attempts, correlation between attempts, underlying false non-match rates(FNMR's), and number of groups.