skip to main content

Title: Bilateral Contracts Between NGPPs and Renewable Plants Can Increase Penetration of Renewables
As the renewable penetration in the grid increases, the grid-takes-all-renewable paradigm will no longer be sustainable. We consider a day-ahead (DA) electricity market composed of a renewable generator, a natural gas power plant (NGPP) and a coal power plant (CPP). Each player provides the Independent System Operator (ISO) with their commitment and their asking price. The ISO schedules the generators using a least-cost strategy. Because of the intrinsic uncertainty of the renewable generation, the renewable player might be unable to meet its DA commitment. In the event of a shortfall, the renewable generator incurs a penalty so that the non-renewable sources are not forced to consume the cost of renewable intermittence. It has been recognized that such a penalty can lead to conservative bidding by the renewable generator, which may lead to lower than desired penetration of renewable energy in the grid. We formulate and analyze a contract between the renewable producer and the NGPP so that the NGPP reserves some amount of natural gas to hedge the renewable producer against shortfalls. Expressions for the optimal commitments of the players and for the optimal reserve contract are derived. When a reserve contract is established, we observe an increase both in more » the average profit of the players involved and in the renewable participation in the market. Thus, we show that a Pareto-optimal contract between market players can improve renewable penetration. « less
Authors:
; ; ;
Award ID(s):
1739295
Publication Date:
NSF-PAR ID:
10076434
Journal Name:
2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC)
Page Range or eLocation-ID:
6176 to 6181
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. The intermittent nature of renewable energy generation implies that renewable producers rely on non-renewable producers to ensure the aggregate power delivered meets the promised quality of service. Therefore, the intermittent nature of renewable energy generation affects the committed power and market price of energy. We consider an electricity market where renewable and non-renewable generators bid by proposing their asking price per unit of energy to an independent system operator (ISO). The ISO solves a dispatch optimization problem to minimize the cost of purchased energy on behalf of the consumers. We incorporate the notion of net-load variance using the Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVAR) measure in the dispatch optimization problem to ensure that the generators are able to meet the load within a desired confidence level. We analytically derive the market clearing price of energy and dispatched powers as a function of CVAR and show that a higher penetration of renewable energies may increase the market clearing price of energy. Finally, we present descriptive simulations to illustrate the impact of renewable energy penetration on the market price of energy.
  2. Uwe Sauer, Dirk (Ed.)
    A B S T R A C T The probabilistic and intermittent output power of Wind Turbines (WT) is one major inconsistency of these Renewable Energy Sources (RES). Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) are a suitable solution to mitigate this intermittency by smoothening WT’s output power. Although the main benefit of BESSs mentions as peak shaving and load-shifting, but in this research, it will verify that optimal placement and sizing them jointly with WTs can lead to more benefits like compensating the required system’s reactive power support from WTs. The reactive power size of WTs and BESSs will be derived from the result of the joint sizing and placement in this study, as well as their active power output to meet the load demand. This can facilitate WTs and BESSs contribution to cover the system’s required reactive power and their participation in the reactive power market and ancillary services. This paper also proposes new cost functions for both WTs and BESSs and minimizes their cost while ensuring minimal total loss (active and reactive) in the power distribution system. This can benefit both WTs’ and BESSs’ owners as well as system operators. Suitable placement and sizing of the WTs and BESSsmore »can also improve the load bus voltage profiles, which can benefit the end-users, and will verify using the proposed optimization by different case studies on the 33 bus distribution system. The results of case studies ascertain the consistency of the proposed formulation for placement and sizing BESSs and WTs jointly, as well as other benefits to the power system, the power plant owners, and system operators.« less
  3. Proper integration of energy storage systems (ESS) into existing or future grids will depend on the effectiveness of models which seek optimal placement and sizing at the transmission and distribution levels. Current literature reviews reveal sizing methodologies can be improved to ease infrastructure integration, and those works with models useful for planning focus solely on micro-grids, wind power and forecasting, photovoltaics, or small communities. It is of interest to create an efficient, reliable ESS sizing model for large scale grids that contains interpretable models, has less sensitivity due to low model uncertainty, yet still is dependable due to an imposed reliability criterion. This work determined the minimum feasible size ESS to satisfy reserve requirements for a power grid with a high penetration of renewable sources. Results showed imposing a reliability criterion through loss of load expectation (LOLE) and energy index of reliability (EIR) resulted in more conservative capacity needs.
  4. Power grids are undergoing major changes due to rapid growth in renewable energy and improvements in battery technology. Prompted by the increasing complexity of power systems, decentralized IoT solutions are emerging, which arrange local communities into transactive microgrids. The core functionality of these solutions is to provide mechanisms for matching producers with consumers while ensuring system safety. However, there are multiple challenges that these solutions still face: privacy, trust, and resilience. The privacy challenge arises because the time series of production and consumption data for each participant is sensitive and may be used to infer personal information. Trust is an issue because a producer or consumer can renege on the promised energy transfer. Providing resilience is challenging due to the possibility of failures in the infrastructure that is required to support these market based solutions. In this paper, we develop a rigorous solution for transactive microgrids that addresses all three challenges by providing an innovative combination of MILP solvers, smart contracts, and publish-subscribe middleware within a framework of a novel distributed application platform, called Resilient Information Architecture Platform for Smart Grid. Towards this purpose, we describe the key architectural concepts, including fault tolerance, and show the trade-off between market efficiencymore »and resource requirements.« less
  5. With an increase in renewable energy generation in the United States, there is a growing need for more frequency regulation to ensure the stability of the electric grid. Fast ramping natural gas plants are often used for frequency regulation, but this creates emissions associated with the burning of fossil fuels. Energy storage systems (ESSs), such as batteries and flywheels, provide an alternative frequency regulation service. However, the efficiency losses of charging and discharging a storage system cause additional electrical generation requirements and associated emissions. There is not a good understanding of these indirect emissions from charging and discharging ESSs in the literature, with most sources stating that ESSs for frequency regulation have lower emissions, without quantification of these emissions. We created a model to estimate three types of emissions (CO2, NOX, and SO2) from ESSs providing frequency regulation, and compare them to emissions from a natural gas plant providing the same service. When the natural gas plant is credited for the generated electricity, storage systems have 33% to 68% lower CO2 emissions than the gas turbine, depending on the US eGRID subregion, but higher NOX and SO2 emissions. However, different plausible assumptions about the framing of the analysis can makemore »ESSs a worse choice so the true difference depends on the nature of the substitution between storage and natural gas generation.« less