skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Comment on "Solute-specific scaling of inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus uptake in streams" by Hall et al. (2013)
Abstract. Hall et al. (2013) presented a synthesis on 969 nutrient tracer experiments conducted primarily in headwater streams (generally < fourth-order streams), with discharges < 200 L s−1 for ~90 % of the experiments, and used a scaling method to test the hypothesis that nutrient demand is constant with increasing stream size (i.e., along a river continuum). In this comment we present a reanalysis of a subset of the data used by Hall et al. (2013) and propose that their correlations between nutrient uptake lengths of ecologically important solutes and specific discharge are inadvertently spurious. Therefore, the conclusions derived from such correlations are debatable. We conclude the comment by highlighting some of the uncertainties associated with using modeling frameworks for scaling nutrient uptake in stream ecosystems.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1301346
PAR ID:
10081667
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Biogeosciences
Volume:
12
Issue:
18
ISSN:
1726-4189
Page Range / eLocation ID:
5365 to 5369
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Freshwater Science)
    Stream bryophytes (mosses and liverworts) are widely recognized as important macroinvertebrate habitats, but their overall role in the stream ecosystem, particularly in nutrient cycling, remains understudied. Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest in New Hampshire, USA, contains some of the most extensively researched streams in the world, yet few studies mention their bryophytes. Perhaps this is because early estimates place bryophyte coverage in these streams at an insignificant 2%. However, data from 2019 show that contemporary coverage ranges from 4 to 40% among streams. To investigate how stream bryophyte cover may be changing over time and influencing stream nutrient stocks, we conducted field surveys, measured the mass of organic and inorganic bryophyte contents, and quantified nutrient uptake with bottle incubations of bryophyte mats. This study marks a novel attempt to map stream bryophyte coverage with estimates of C, P, and N stocks and fluxes. From our 2022 field surveys, we found that median bryophyte coverage varied across streams in the same catchment (0–41.4%) and shifted from just 3 y prior. We estimate that these bryophyte mats stored between 14 and 414 g of organic matter per m2 of stream in the form of live biomass and captured particulates. Within 12 h of light incubation, 35 out of 36 bryophyte clump samples sorbed peak historical water-column concentrations of PO43– as measured in the Hubbard Brook stream chemistry record. In Bear Brook, our scaled estimate of bryophyte mat NO3– uptake (2.3 g N/y) constitutes a substantial portion of previously estimated whole-stream NO3– uptake (12 g N/y). Cumulatively, our data demonstrate that bryophytes and their associated mineral substrates and biota—known as the bryosphere—are crucial in facilitating headwater stream nutrient cycling. These bryospheres may contribute significantly to interannual variability in stream nutrient concentrations within nutrient-poor streams, especially in climate-sensitive regions. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; (, JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association)
    Abstract Urbanization increases stormwater runoff into streams, resulting in channel erosion, and increases in sediment and nutrient delivery to receiving water bodies. Stream restoration is widely used as a Best Management Practice to stabilize banks and reduce sediment and nutrient loads. While most instream nutrient retention measurements are often limited to low flow conditions, most of the nutrient load is mobilized at high stream flows in urban settings. We, therefore, use a process‐based stream ecosystem model in conjunction with measurements at low flows and focus on estimation of stream nitrogen retention over the full streamflow distribution. The model provides a theoretical framework to evaluate the geomorphic, hydrologic, and ecological factors that are manipulated by stream restoration, and drive nitrogen retention. We set a model for a pool‐riffle sequence restored stream (190 m) in Baltimore County, Maryland and calibrated the model to thein situmeasured primary production (Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient [NSE] NSE = 0.89), respiration (NSE = 0.74), and nitrate uptake lengths (R2 = 0.88). At the daily scale, simulations showed low nitrogen retention during high flows due to high transport rates, mobilization of stored hyporheic nitrogen, and scouring of periphyton biomass. This result underscores the need to reduce contributing watershed runoff flashiness to promote aquatic nutrient cycling and retention. At monthly and yearly time scale, model predicted a higher percent reduction in summer than in winter and estimated 5.7%–9.5% of annual nitrate reductions. While the model was tested in a pool‐riffle sequence restoration design, the approach can be adapted to evaluate a range of channel restoration design characteristics, and the effects of upland watershed restoration to mitigate stormwater loading through both restored and unrestored streams. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; (, Environmental Data Initiative)
    Stream bryophytes (mosses and liverworts) are widely recognized as important macroinvertebrate habitats, but their overall role in the stream ecosystem, particularly in nutrient cycling, remains understudied. Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest contains some of the most extensively researched streams in the world, yet few studies mention their bryophytes. Perhaps this is because early estimates place stream bryophyte coverage at an insignificant 2%. However, data from 2019 show that contemporary coverage ranges from 4%–40% among streams. To investigate how stream bryophyte cover may be changing over time and influencing stream nutrient stocks, we conducted field surveys, measured organic and inorganic mass contents of bryophytes, and quantified nutrient uptake with bottle incubations of bryophyte mats. This study marks a novel attempt to map stream bryophyte coverage with estimates of carbon, phosphorus, and nitrogen stocks and fluxes. From our 2022 field surveys, we found that median bryophyte coverage can vary greatly across streams in the same catchment (0%–41.4%) and can also shift from just three years prior. We estimate that these bryophyte mats store between 14–414 g of organic matter per m2 of stream in the form of live biomass and captured particulates. Out of 36 bryophyte clump samples, 35 sorbed peak historical water column concentrations of PO43- measured within the Hubbard Brook stream chemistry record within 12 hours of light incubation. In Bear Brook, our scaled estimate of bryophyte mat nitrate uptake (2.3 g N y-1) constitutes a substantial portion of previously estimated whole-stream nitrate uptake (12 g N y-1). Cumulatively, our data demonstrates that bryophytes and their associated mineral substrates and biota—known as the bryosphere—are crucial in facilitating headwater stream nutrient cycling. These bryospheres may contribute significantly to interannual variability in stream nutrient concentrations within nutrient-poor streams, especially in climate-sensitive regions. These data were gathered as part of the Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study (HBES). The HBES is a collaborative effort at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, which is operated and maintained by the USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; (, Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences)
    Abstract In polar regions, where many glaciers are cold based (frozen to their beds), biological communities on the glacier surface can modulate and transform nutrients, controlling downstream delivery. However, it remains unclear whether supraglacial streams are nutrient sinks or sources and the rates of nutrient processing. In order to test this, we conducted tracer injections in three supraglacial streams (62 to 123 m long) on Canada Glacier in the Taylor Valley, of the McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica. We conducted a series of additions including nitrate (N), N + phosphate (P), N + P + glucose (C), and N + C. In two reaches, N‐only additions resulted in N uptake. The third reach showed net N release during the N‐only addition, but high N uptake in the N + P addition, indicating P‐limitation or N + P colimitation. Coinjecting C did not increase N‐uptake. Additionally, in these systems at low N concentrations the streams can be a net source of nitrogen. We confirmed these findings using laboratory‐based nutrient incubation experiments on sediment collected from stream channels on Canada Glacier and two other glaciers in the Taylor Valley. Together, these results suggest there is active biological processing of nutrients occurring in these supraglacial streams despite low sediment cover, high flow velocities, and cold temperatures, modifying the input signals to proglacial streams. As glaciers worldwide undergo rapid change, these findings further our understanding of how melt generated on glacier surfaces set the initial nutrient signature for subglacial and downstream environments. 
    more » « less
  5. (, Limnology and Oceanography: Methods)
    Abstract Multiple different equations have been used to quantify nutrient uptake rates from stable isotope tracer label incorporation experiments. Each of these equations implicitly assumes an underlying model for phytoplankton nutrient uptake behavior within the incubation bottle and/or pelagic environment. However, the applicability of different equations remains in question and uncertainty arising from subjective choices of which equation to use is never reported. In this study, I use two approaches to investigate the conditions under which different nutrient uptake equations should be used. First, I utilized a moderate‐complexity pelagic ecosystem model that explicitly models the δ15N values of all model compartments (NEMURO + 15N) to conduct simulated nitrate uptake and ammonium uptake incubations and quantify the accuracy of different nutrient uptake equations. Second, I used results of deckboard diel nutrient uptake experiments to quantify the biases of 24‐h incubations relative to six consecutive 4‐h incubations. Using both approaches, I found that equations that account for nutrient regeneration (i.e., isotope dilution) are more accurate than equations that do not, particularly when nutrient concentrations are low but uptake is relatively high. Furthermore, I find that if the goal is to estimate in situ uptake rates it is appropriate to use an in situ correction to standard equations. I also present complete equations for quantifying uncertainty in nutrient uptake experiments using each nutrient uptake equation and make all of these calculations available as Excel spreadsheets and Matlab scripts. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email