skip to main content


Title: Toward autonomous surface-based infrared remote sensing of polar clouds: cloud-height retrievals

Abstract. Polar regions are characterized by their remoteness, making measurements challenging, but an improved knowledge of clouds and radiation is necessary to understand polar climate change. Infrared radiance spectrometers can operate continuously from the surface and have low power requirements relative to active sensors. Here we explore the feasibility of retrieving cloud height with an infrared spectrometer that would be designed for use in remote polar locations. Using a wide variety of simulated spectra of mixed-phase polar clouds at varying instrument resolutions, retrieval accuracy is explored using the CO2 slicing/sorting and the minimum local emissivity variance (MLEV) methods. In the absence of imposed errors and for clouds with optical depths greater than  ∼ 0.3, cloud-height retrievals from simulated spectra using CO2 slicing/sorting and MLEV are found to have roughly equivalent high accuracies: at an instrument resolution of 0.5cm−1, mean biases are found to be  ∼ 0.2km for clouds with bases below 2 and −0.2km for higher clouds. Accuracy is found to decrease with coarsening resolution and become worse overall for MLEV than for CO2 slicing/sorting; however, the two methods have differing sensitivity to different sources of error, suggesting an approach that combines them. For expected errors in the atmospheric state as well as both instrument noise and bias of 0.2mW/(m2srcm−1), at a resolution of 4cm−1, average retrieval errors are found to be less than  ∼ 0.5km for cloud bases within 1km of the surface, increasing to  ∼ 1.5km at 4km. This sensitivity indicates that a portable, surface-based infrared radiance spectrometer could provide an important complement in remote locations to satellite-based measurements, for which retrievals of low-level cloud are challenging.

 
more » « less
Award ID(s):
1543236
NSF-PAR ID:
10083501
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Volume:
9
Issue:
8
ISSN:
1867-8548
Page Range / eLocation ID:
3641 to 3659
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract. Improvements to climate model results in polar regions require improvedknowledge of cloud properties. Surface-based infrared (IR) radiancespectrometers have been used to retrieve cloud properties in polar regions,but measurements are sparse. Reductions in cost and power requirements toallow more widespread measurements could be aided by reducing instrumentresolution. Here we explore the effects of errors and instrument resolutionon cloud property retrievals from downwelling IR radiances for resolutionsof 0.1 to 20 cm−1. Retrievals are tested on 336 radiance simulationscharacteristic of the Arctic, including mixed-phase, verticallyinhomogeneous, and liquid-topped clouds and a variety of ice habits.Retrieval accuracy is found to be unaffected by resolution from 0.1 to 4 cm−1, after which it decreases slightly. When cloud heights areretrieved, errors in retrieved cloud optical depth (COD) and ice fractionare considerably smaller for clouds with bases below 2 km than for higherclouds. For example, at a resolution of 4 cm−1, with errors imposed(noise and radiation bias of 0.2 mW/(m2 sr cm−1) and biases intemperature of 0.2 K and in water vapor of −3 %), using retrieved cloudheights, root-mean-square errors decrease from 1.1 to 0.15 for COD, 0.3 to0.18 for ice fraction (fice), and 10 to 7 µm for iceeffective radius (errors remain at 2 µm for liquid effective radius).These results indicate that a moderately low-resolution, surface-based IRspectrometer could provide cloud property retrievals with accuracycomparable to existing higher-resolution instruments and that such aninstrument would be particularly useful for low-level clouds. 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract. One-dimensional variational retrievals of temperature and moisture fields from hyperspectral infrared (IR) satellite sounders use cloud-cleared radiances (CCRs) as their observation. These derived observations allow the use of clear-sky-only radiative transfer in the inversion for geophysical variables but at reduced spatial resolution compared to the native sounder observations. Cloud clearing can introduce various errors, although scenes with large errors can be identified and ignored. Information content studies show that, when using multilayer cloud liquid and ice profiles in infrared hyperspectral radiative transfer codes, there are typically only 2–4 degrees of freedom (DOFs) of cloud signal. This implies a simplified cloud representation is sufficient for some applications which need accurate radiative transfer. Here we describe a single-footprint retrieval approach for clear and cloudy conditions, which uses the thermodynamic and cloud fields from numerical weather prediction (NWP) models as a first guess, together with a simple cloud-representation model coupled to a fast scattering radiative transfer algorithm (RTA). The NWP model thermodynamic and cloud profiles are first co-located to the observations, after which the N-level cloud profiles are converted to two slab clouds (TwoSlab; typically one for ice and one for water clouds). From these, one run of our fast cloud-representation model allows an improvement of the a priori cloud state by comparing the observed and model-simulated radiances in the thermal window channels. The retrieval yield is over 90%, while the degrees of freedom correlate with the observed window channel brightness temperature (BT) which itself depends on the cloud optical depth. The cloud-representation and scattering package is benchmarked against radiances computed using a maximum random overlap (RMO) cloud scheme. All-sky infrared radiances measured by NASA's Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) and NWP thermodynamic and cloud profiles from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) forecast model are used in this paper.

     
    more » « less
  3. Abstract. Many passive remote-sensing techniques have beendeveloped to retrieve cloud microphysical properties from satellite-basedsensors, with the most common approaches being the bispectral andpolarimetric techniques. These two vastly different retrieval techniqueshave been implemented for a variety of polar-orbiting and geostationarysatellite platforms, providing global climatological data sets. Priorinstrument comparison studies have shown that there are systematicdifferences between the droplet size retrieval products (effective radius)of bispectral (e.g., MODIS, Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer)and polarimetric (e.g., POLDER, Polarization and Directionality of Earth'sReflectances) instruments. However, intercomparisons of airborne bispectraland polarimetric instruments have yielded results that do not appear to besystematically biased relative to one another. Diagnosing this discrepancyis complicated, because it is often difficult for instrument intercomparisonstudies to isolate differences between retrieval technique sensitivities andspecific instrumental differences such as calibration and atmosphericcorrection. In addition to these technical differences the polarimetricretrieval is also sensitive to the dispersion of the droplet sizedistribution (effective variance), which could influence the interpretationof the droplet size retrieval. To avoid these instrument-dependentcomplications, this study makes use of a cloud remote-sensing retrievalsimulator. Created by coupling a large-eddy simulation (LES) cloud modelwith a 1-D radiative transfer model, the simulator serves as a test bed forunderstanding differences between bispectral and polarimetric retrievals.With the help of this simulator we can not only compare the two techniquesto one another (retrieval intercomparison) but also validate retrievalsdirectly against the LES cloud properties. Using the satellite retrievalsimulator, we are able to verify that at high spatial resolution (50m) thebispectral and polarimetric retrievals are highly correlated with oneanother within expected observational uncertainties. The relatively smallsystematic biases at high spatial resolution can be attributed to differentsensitivity limitations of the two retrievals. In contrast, a systematicdifference between the two retrievals emerges at coarser resolution. Thisbias largely stems from differences related to sensitivity of the tworetrievals to unresolved inhomogeneities in effective variance and opticalthickness. The influence of coarse angular resolution is found to increaseuncertainty in the polarimetric retrieval but generally maintains aconstant mean value.

     
    more » « less
  4. Abstract. We present the development and assessment of a new flight system that uses acommercially available continuous-wave, tunable infrared laser directabsorption spectrometer to measure N2O, CO2, CO, andH2O. When the commercial system is operated in an off-the-shelfmanner, we find a clear cabin pressure–altitude dependency forN2O, CO2, and CO. The characteristics of this artifactmake it difficult to reconcile with conventional calibration methods. Wepresent a novel procedure that extends upon traditional calibrationapproaches in a high-flow system with high-frequency, short-duration samplingof a known calibration gas of near-ambient concentration. This approachcorrects for cabin pressure dependency as well as other sources of drift inthe analyzer while maintaining a ∼90% duty cycle for 1Hz sampling.Assessment and validation of the flight system with both extensive in-flightcalibrations and comparisons with other flight-proven sensors demonstrate thevalidity of this method. In-flight 1σ precision is estimated at0.05ppb, 0.10ppm, 1.00ppb, and 10ppm for N2O,CO2, CO, and H2O respectively, and traceability to WorldMeteorological Organization (WMO) standards (1σ) is 0.28ppb,0.33ppm, and 1.92ppb for N2O, CO2, and CO. We showthe system is capable of precise, accurate 1Hz airborne observations ofN2O, CO2, CO, and H2O and highlight flightdata, illustrating the value of this analyzer for studying N2Oemissions on ∼100km spatial scales.

     
    more » « less
  5. Abstract

    A recent laboratory study suggests that water vapor displays structured absorption features over the 290–350 nm region, with maximum and minimum cross‐sections of 8.4 × 10−25and 1.4 × 10−25 cm2/molecule at room temperature (Pei et al. 2019,https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd030724; Du et al., 2013,https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50935). To observe water vapor absorption features in the ultraviolet (UV) region in the atmosphere, a United States Department of Agriculture reference spectroradiometer was upgraded with a new fore‐optical module, enabling it to measure direct solar beam and sky radiance at given azimuth and elevation angles. This double Czerny‐Turner spectroradiometer enables wavelength scanning from 290 to 410 nm, with a nominal bandwidth of 0.1 nm. It can operate with a step‐size of 0.0005 nm and a full width at half maximum of 0.1 nm. It has an out‐of‐band rejection ratio of approximately 10−10. This high resolution spectroradiometer can be used as a reference instrument for UV radiation measurements and for monitoring atmospheric gases such as O3, SO2, and NO2. A series of field observations were made using this spectroradiometer in the University at Albany campus. A residual analysis method is developed to analyze absorption by atmospheric components and to retrieve atmospheric optical depth. The residual optical depth was calculated by subtracting the optical depths of Rayleigh scattering, aerosol extinction, and absorption of typical atmospheric gases such as O3, SO2, and NO2from the retrieved total optical depth. Multiple case studies show that residual optical depth from the observed UV spectra is sensitive to the atmospheric water vapor amount. The greater the water vapor path, the larger the magnitude of residual optical depth. The ozone amount was inferred from the residual analysis; it is comparable to the satellite measurements. For example, in a case with water vapor path of 13 mm on October 24, 2019, the inferred ozone amount from residual analysis is 2.7% lower than retrievals from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument‐Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer.

     
    more » « less