skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Tropical Cyclones in the NASA GEOS-5 Model and MERRA-2 Reanalysis
Studies of projected changes in tropical cyclones under anthropogenic climate change, as well as their modulation by internal climate modes, make use of global climate models. To this end, tropical cyclones can be tracked in the output of higher resolution models. Using climate models to make future projections of tropical cyclones relies upon having a baseline of the characteristics of model storms under the current climate. This study focuses on two high-resolution datasets – the NASA GEOS-5 Model (Goddard Earth Observing System Model, Version 5) and the MERRA-2 Reanalysis (Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2). Both of these datasets were created using exactly the same atmospheric model during the same period. However, while GEOS-5 is a free-running atmospheric model forced only with sea surface temperature, MERRA-2 is a reanalysis product, i.e. the model assimilates data from a large variety of data sources. Thus, by comparing tropical cyclones tracked in these datasets to each other and global best track datasets in the period 1980-1999, this project aims to evaluate 1) the sensitivity of this model to how it is forced and 2) how well the storms tracked in GEOS-5 and MERRA-2 replicate observed tropical cyclones’ characteristics. We used two different tracking schemes on both datasets and found no significant difference in the performance of the model and the reanalysis in simulating tropical cyclones. Standard diagnostics for tropical cyclones, such as the mean number, intensity distribution, as well as their interannual variability are very similar in the free-running model and the reanalysis. Both GEOS-5 and MERRA-2 show a bias towards weaker tropical cyclones than observed and GEOS-5 has storms that occur closer to the equator than in the observed record. Neither GEOS-5 nor MERRA-2 accurately reproduce tropical cyclone modulation by ENSO. Additionally, comparison of MERRA-2 to other reanalysis datasets shows that MERRA-2 on average generates fewer total but also more intense storms than the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Interim Reanalysis (ERA-Interim) and Japanese 55-Year Reanalysis (JRA-55). Further research must be performed to understand why this data assimilation is failing to provide a positive impact on the tropical cyclone simulation in this model.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1757602
PAR ID:
10091135
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
American Meteorological Society Annual Meeting, Abstract S251
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; (, Journal of Climate)
    Abstract This study compares the spread in climatological tropical cyclone (TC) precipitation across eight different reanalysis datasets: NCEP-CFSR, ERA-20C, ERA-40, ERA5, ERA-Interim, JRA-55, MERRA-2, and NOAA-20C. TC precipitation is assigned using manual tracking via a fixed 500-km radius from each TC center. The reanalyses capture similar general spatial patterns of TC precipitation and TC precipitation fraction, defined as the fraction of annual precipitation assigned to TCs, and the spread in TC precipitation is larger than the spread in total precipitation across reanalyses. The spread in TC precipitation relative to the inter-reanalysis mean TC precipitation, or relative spread, is larger in the east Pacific than in the west Pacific. Partitioned by reanalysis intensity, the largest relative spread across reanalyses in TC precipitation is from high-intensity TCs. In comparison with satellite observations, reanalyses show lower climatological mean annual TC precipitation over most areas. A comparison of area-averaged precipitation rate in TCs composited over reanalysis intensity shows the spread across reanalyses is larger for higher intensity TCs. Testing the sensitivity of TC precipitation assignment to tracking method shows that climatological mean annual TC precipitation is systematically larger when assigned via manual tracking versus objective tracking. However, this tendency is minimized when TC precipitation is normalized by TC density. Overall, TC precipitation in reanalyses is affected by not only horizontal output resolution or any TC preprocessing, but also data assimilation and parameterization schemes. The results indicate that improvements in the representation of TCs and their precipitation in reanalyses are needed to improve overall precipitation. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; (, Geoscientific Model Development)
    Abstract. This paper describes version 2.0 of the Global Change and Air Pollution (GCAP 2.0) model framework, a one-way offline coupling between version E2.1 of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) general circulation model (GCM) and the GEOS-Chem global 3-D chemical-transport model (CTM). Meteorology for driving GEOS-Chem has been archived from the E2.1 contributions to phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) for the pre-industrial era and the recent past. In addition, meteorology is available for the near future and end of the century for seven future scenarios ranging from extreme mitigation to extreme warming. Emissions and boundary conditions have been prepared for input to GEOS-Chem that are consistent with the CMIP6 experimental design. The model meteorology, emissions, transport, and chemistry are evaluated in the recent past and found to be largely consistent with GEOS-Chem driven by the Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications version 2 (MERRA-2) product and with observational constraints. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; (, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres)
    Abstract Tropical easterly waves (TEWs) are a recurrent mode of low‐latitude weather that are often convectively coupled and impact precipitation extremes. Previous work has examined the development of TEWs and their associated precipitation for individual seasons or regional domains, but no studies exist that document the importance of TEW precipitation globally. This study quantifies the precipitation associated with TEWs across the entire tropics using satellite (Integrated Multi‐satellitE Retrievals for the Global Precipitation Measurement [IMERG]) and reanalysis (Modern‐Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 [MERRA‐2]) data. Traditional space‐time filtering of precipitation reveals a mostly similar climatological power distribution for westward traveling, synoptic period disturbances corresponding to TEWs within all data sets. Using objective tracking, we find that areas with maximum TEW frequency such as the North Atlantic, Equatorial Pacific, and Indian Ocean have the highest accumulation of TEW‐associated precipitation. TEWs account for at most 30% of total annual precipitation in regions where they commonly occur and 1%–5% over much of the tropics. Vertically collocated storms, where the 850 and 700 hPa tracks correspond with each other, have higher conditional rain rates and indicate that waves with vertical development produce stronger and more organized convection. We find similar regional patterns using MERRA‐2 precipitation and latent heating, although the importance and contribution of TEWs to the background are reduced compared to IMERG. While the broad pattern of TEW associated precipitation in MERRA‐2 is like observations, the underestimation of rainfall contributions from TEWs, coupled with occasional false alarms in reanalysis data, suggests that MERRA‐2 does not capture organized convection within TEWs correctly. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; (, University Libraries, Virginia Tech)
    {"Abstract":["This is software and data to support the manuscript "Variations in Tropical Cyclone Size and Rainfall Patterns based on Synoptic-Scale Moisture Environments in the North Atlantic," which we are submitting to the journal, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres.The MIT license applies to all source code and scripts published in this dataset.The software includes all code that is necessary to follow and evaluate the work. Public datasets include (1) the Atlantic hurricane database HURDAT2 (https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/#hurdat), (2) NASA’s Global Precipitation Measurement IMERG final precipitation (https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/gpm-imerg-final-precipitation-l3-half-hourly-0-1-degree-x-0-1-degree-v07-gpm-3imerghh-at-g), (3) the Tropical Cyclone Extended Best Track Dataset (https://rammb2.cira.colostate.edu/research/tropical-cyclones/tc_extended_best_track_dataset/), (4) the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) atmospheric reanalysis (ERA5) (https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/datasets/reanalysis-datasets/era5), and (5) the Statistical Hurricane Intensity Prediction Scheme (SHIPS) dataset (https://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/research/tropical_cyclones/ships/data/). We are also including four datasets generated by the code that will be helpful in evaluating the work. Lastly, we used the eofs software package, a python package for computing empirical orthogonal functions (EOFs), available publicly here: https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.122.All figures and tables in the manuscript are generated using Python, ArcGIS Pro, and GraphPad/Prism 10 Software:ArcGIS Pro used to make Figures 5GraphPad/Prism 10 Software used to make box plots in Figures 6-9Python used to make Figures 1-4, 10-11, and Tables 1-5Public Datasets:HURDAT2: Landsea, C. and Beven, J., 2019: The revised Atlantic hurricane database (HURDAT2). March 2022, https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/hurdat2-format.pdfIMERG:NASA EarthData: GPM IMERG Final Precipitation L3 Half Hourly 0.1 degree x 0.1 degree V06. 9 December 2024, https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/gpm-imerg-final-precipitation-l3-half-hourly-0-1-degree-x-0-1-degree-v07-gpm-3imerghh-at-g. Note that this dataset is not longer publicly available, as it has been replaced with IMERG version 7: https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/datasets/GPM_3IMERGHH_07/summary?keywords="IMERG final"Extended Best Track:Regional and Mesoscale Meteorology Branch, 2022: The Tropical Cyclone Extended Best Track Dataset (EBTRK). March 2022, https://rammb2.cira.colostate.edu/research/tropical-cyclones/tc_extended_best_track_dataset/ERA5: Guillory, A. (2022). ERA5. Ecmwf [Dataset]. https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/datasets/reanalysis-datasets/era5. (Accessed March 2, 2023). Also: Hersbach, H., and Coauthors, 2020: The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 146, 1999–2049, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803SHIPS:Ships Predictor Files - Colorado State University (2022). Statistical Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecast Technique Development. https://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/research/tropical_cyclones/ships/data/ships_predictor_file_2022.pdf. Also: DeMaria, M., and J. Kaplan, 1994: A Statistical Hurricane Intensity Prediction Scheme (SHIPS) for the Atlantic Basin. Weather and Forecasting, 9, 209–220, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1994)009<0209:ASHIPS>2.0.CO;2.Public Software: Dawson, A., 2016: eofs: A Library for EOF Analysis of Meteorological, Oceanographic, and Climate Data. JORS, 4, 14, https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.122.van der Walt, S., Schönberger, J. L., Nunez-Iglesias, J., Boulogne, F., Warner, J. D., Yager, N., et al. (2014). Scikit-image: Image processing in Python [Software]. PeerJ, 2, e453. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.453"]} 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; (, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology)
    Abstract Extratropical cyclones are the primary driver of sensible weather conditions across the mid-latitudes of North America, often generating various types of precipitation, gusty non-convective winds, and severe convective storms throughout portions of the annual cycle. Given ongoing modifications of the zonal atmospheric thermal gradient due to anthropogenic forcing, analyzing the historical characteristics of these systems presents an important research question. Using the North American Regional Reanalysis, boreal cool-season (October–April) extratropical cyclones for the period 1979–2019 were identified, tracked, and classified based on their genesis location. Additionally, bomb cyclones—extratropical cyclones that recorded a latitude normalized pressure fall of 24 hPa in 24-hr—were identified and stratified for additional analysis. Cyclone lifespan across the domain exhibits a log-linear relationship, with 99% of all cyclones tracked lasting less than 8 days. On average, ≈ 270 cyclones were tracked across the analysis domain per year, with an average of ≈ 18 year −1 being classified as bomb cyclones. The average number of cyclones in the analysis domain has decreased in the last 20 years from 290 year −1 during the period 1979–1999 to 250 year −1 during the period 2000–2019. Spatially, decreasing trends in the frequency of cyclone track counts were noted across a majority of the analysis domain, with the most significant decreases found in Canada’s Northwest Territories, Colorado, and east of the Graah mountain range. No significant interannual or spatial trends were noted with bomb cyclone frequency. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email