An official website of the United States government
As the internet and social media continue to become increasingly used for sharing break- ing news and important updates, it is with great motivation to study the behaviors of online users during crisis events. One of the biggest issues with obtaining information online is the veracity of such content. Given this vulnerability, misinformation becomes a very danger- ous and real threat when spread online. This study investigates misinformation debunking efforts and fills the research gap on cross-platform information sharing when misinforma- tion is spread during disasters. The false rumor “immigration status is checked at shelters” spread in both Hurricane Harvey and Hurricane Irma in 2017 and was analyzed in this paper based on a collection of 12,900 tweets. By studying the rumor control efforts made by thousands of accounts, we found that Twitter users respond and interact the most with tweets from verified Twitter accounts, and especially government organizations. Results on sourcing analysis show that the majority of Twitter users who utilize URLs in their post- ings are employing the information in the URLs to help debunk the false rumor. The most frequently cited information comes from news agencies when analyzing both URLs and domains. This paper provides novel insights into rumor control efforts made through social media during natural disasters and also the information sourcing and sharing behaviors that users exhibit during the debunking of false rumors.
more »
« less
A Multi-Algorithm Approach for Classifying Misinformed Twitter Data during Crisis Events
Social media is being increasingly utilized to spread breaking news and updates during disasters of all magnitudes. Unfortunately, due to the unmoderated nature of social media platforms such as Twitter, rumors and misinformation are able to propagate widely. Given this, a surfeit of research has studied rumor diffusion on social media, especially during natural disasters. In many studies, researchers manually code social media data to further analyze the patterns and diffusion dynamics of users and misinformation. This method requires many human hours, and is prone to significant incorrect classifications if the work is not checked over by another individual. In our studies, we fill the research gap by applying seven different machine learning algorithms to automatically classify misinformed Twitter data that is spread during disaster events. Due to the unbalanced nature of the data, three different balancing algorithms are also applied and compared. We collect and drive the classifiers with data from the Manchester Arena bombing (2017), Hurricane Harvey (2017), the Hawaiian incoming missile alert (2018), and the East Coast US tsunami alert (2018). Over 20,000 tweets are classified based on the veracity of their content as either true, false, or neutral, with overall accuracies exceeding 89%.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10096628
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of the 2019 IISE Annual Conference
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
In an era increasingly affected by natural and human-caused disasters, the role of social media in disaster communication has become ever more critical. Despite substantial research on social media use during crises, a significant gap remains in detecting crisis-related misinformation. Detecting deviations in information is fundamental for identifying and curbing the spread of misinformation. This study introduces a novel Information Switching Pattern Model to identify dynamic shifts in perspectives among users who mention each other in crisisrelated narratives on social media. These shifts serve as evidence of crisis misinformation affecting user-mention network interactions. The study utilizes advanced natural language processing, network science, and census data to analyze geotagged tweets related to compound disaster events in Oklahoma in 2022. The impact of misinformation is revealed by distinct engagement patterns among various user types, such as bots, private organizations, non-profits, government agencies, and news media throughout different disaster stages. These patterns show how different disasters influence public sentiment, highlight the heightened vulnerability of mobile home communities, and underscore the importance of education and transportation access in crisis response. Understanding these engagement patterns is crucial for detecting misinformation and leveraging social media as an effective tool for risk communication during disastersmore » « less
-
Global social media use during natural disasters has been well documented (Murthy et al., 2017). In the U.S., public social media platforms are often a primary venue for those affected by disasters . Some disaster victims believe first responders will see their public posts and that the 9-1-1 telephone system becomes overloaded during crises. Moreover, some feel that the accuracy and utility of information on social media is likely higher than traditional media sources . However, sifting through content during a disaster is often difficult due to the high volume of ‘non-relevant’ content. In addition, text is studied more than images posted on Twitter, leaving a potential gap in understanding disaster experiences. Images posted on social media during disasters have a high level of complexity (Murthy et al., 2016). Our study responds to O’Neal et al.’s (2017) call-to-action that social media images posted during disasters should be studied using machine learning.more » « less
-
The 2030 Global Sustainable Development Agenda of United Nations highlighted the critical importance of understanding the integrated nature between enhancing infrastructure resilience and facilitating social equity. Social equity is defined as equal opportunities provided to different people by infrastructure. It addresses disparities and unequal distribution of goods, services, and amenities. Infrastructure resilience is defined as the ability of infrastructure to withstand, adapt, and quickly recover from disasters. Existing research shows that infrastructure resilience and social equity are closely related to each other. However, there is a lack of research that explicitly understands the complex relationships between infrastructure resilience and social equity. To address this gap, this study aims to examine such interrelationships using social media data. Social media data is increasingly being used by researchers and proven to be a reliable source of valuable information for understanding human activities and behaviors in a disaster setting. The spatiotemporal distribution of disaster-related messages helps with real-time and quick assessment of the impact of disasters on infrastructure and human society across different regions. Using social media data also offers the advantages of saving time and cost, compared to other traditional data collection methods. As a first step of this study, this paper presents our work on collecting and analyzing the Twitter activities during 2018 Hurricane Michael in disaster-affected counties of Florida Panhandle area. The collected Twitter data was organized based on the geolocations of affected counties and was compared against the infrastructure resilience and social equity data of the affected counties. The results of the analysis indicate that (1) Twitter activities can be used as an important indicator of infrastructure resilience conditions, (2) socially vulnerable populations are not as active as general populations on social media in a disaster setting, and (3) vulnerable populations require a longer time for disaster recovery.more » « less
-
People are increasingly exposed to science and political information from social media. One consequence is that these sites play host to “alternative influencers,” who spread misinformation. However, content posted by alternative influencers on different social media platforms is unlikely to be homogenous. Our study uses computational methods to investigate how dimensions we refer to as audience and channel of social media platforms influence emotion and topics in content posted by “alternative influencers” on different platforms. Using COVID-19 as an example, we find that alternative influencers’ content contained more anger and fear words on Facebook and Twitter compared to YouTube. We also found that these actors discussed substantively different topics in their COVID-19 content on YouTube compared to Twitter and Facebook. With these findings, we discuss how the audience and channel of different social media platforms affect alternative influencers’ ability to spread misinformation online.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Conference Paper:
- The DOI is not currently available.
