skip to main content

Title: Effect of magnetic fields on the methyl rotation in a paramagnetic cobalt( ii ) complex. Quasielastic neutron scattering studies
Molecular dynamics is a fundamental property of metal complexes. These dynamic processes, especially for paramagnetic complexes under external magnetic fields, are in general not well understood. Quasielastic neutron scattering (QENS) in 0–4 T magnetic fields has been used to study the dynamics of Co(acac) 2 (D 2 O) 2 ( 1-d4 , acac = acetylacetonate). At 80–100 K, rotation of the methyl groups on the acac ligands is the dominant dynamical process. This rotation is slowed down by the magnetic field increase. Rotation times at 80 K are 5.6(3) × 10 −10 s at 0 T and 2.04(10) × 10 −9 s at 4 T. The QENS studies suggest that methyl groups in these paramagnetic Co( ii ) molecules do not behave as isolated units, which is consistent with results from earlier magnetic susceptibility studies indicating the presence of intermolecular interactions. DFT calculations show that unpaired electron spin density in 1 is dispersed to the atoms of both acac and H 2 O ligands. Methyl torsions in 1-d4 have also been observed at 5–100 K in inelastic neutron spectroscopy (INS). The QENS and INS results here help understand the dynamics of the compound in the solid state.
Authors:
; ; ; ; ; ;
Award ID(s):
1633870
Publication Date:
NSF-PAR ID:
10099989
Journal Name:
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Volume:
20
Issue:
32
Page Range or eLocation-ID:
21119 to 21126
ISSN:
1463-9076
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Using transition metal ions for spin-based applications, such as electron paramagnetic resonance imaging (EPRI) or quantum computation, requires a clear understanding of how local chemistry influences spin properties. Herein we report a series of four ionic complexes to provide the first systematic study of one aspect of local chemistry on the V( iv ) spin – the counterion. To do so, the four complexes (Et 3 NH) 2 [V(C 6 H 4 O 2 ) 3 ] ( 1 ), ( n -Bu 3 NH) 2 [V(C 6 H 4 O 2 ) 3 ] ( 2 ), ( n -Hex 3 NH) 2 [V(C 6 H 4 O 2 ) 3 ] ( 3 ), and ( n -Oct 3 NH) 2 [V(C 6 H 4 O 2 ) 3 ] ( 4 ) were probed by EPR spectroscopy in solid state and solution. Room temperature, solution X-band ( ca. 9.8 GHz) continuous-wave electron paramagnetic resonance (CW-EPR) spectroscopy revealed an increasing linewidth with larger cations, likely a counterion-controlled tumbling in solution via ion pairing. In the solid state, variable-temperature (5–180 K) X-band ( ca. 9.4 GHz) pulsed EPR studies of 1–4 in o -terphenyl glass demonstrated no effect onmore »spin–lattice relaxation times ( T 1 ), indicating little role for the counterion on this parameter. However, the phase memory time ( T m ) of 1 below 100 K is markedly smaller than those of 2–4 . This result is counterintuitive, as 2–4 are relatively richer in 1 H nuclear spin, hence, expected to have shorter T m . Thus, these data suggest an important role for counterion methyl groups on T m , and moreover provide the first instance of a lengthening T m with increasing nuclear spin quantity on a molecule.« less
  2. Achieving control of phase memory relaxation times ( T m ) in metal ions is an important goal of molecular spintronics. Herein we provide the first evidence that nuclear-spin patterning in the ligand shell is an important handle to modulate T m in metal ions. We synthesized and studied a series of five V( iv ) complexes with brominated catecholate ligands, [V(C 6 H 4−n Br n O 2 ) 3 ] 2− ( n = 0, 1, 2, and 4), where the 79/81 Br and 1 H nuclear spins are arranged in different substitutional patterns. High-field, high-frequency (120 GHz) pulsed electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopic analysis of this series reveals a pattern-dependent variation in T m for the V( iv ) ion. Notably, we show that it is possible for two molecules to have starkly different (by 50%) T m values despite the same chemical composition. Nuclear magnetic resonance analyses of the protons on the ligand shell suggest that relative chemical shift ( δ ), controlled by the patterning of nuclear spins, is an important underlying design principle. Here, having multiple ligand-based protons with nearly identical chemical shift values in the ligand shell will, ultimately, engender a short T mmore »for the bound metal ion.« less
  3. The use of radical bridging ligands to facilitate strong magnetic exchange between paramagnetic metal centers represents a key step toward the realization of single-molecule magnets with high operating temperatures. Moreover, bridging ligands that allow the incorporation of high-anisotropy metal ions are particularly advantageous. Toward these ends, we report the synthesis and detailed characterization of the dinuclear hydroquinone-bridged complexes [(Me 6 tren) 2 MII2(C 6 H 4 O 2 2− )] 2+ (Me 6 tren = tris(2-dimethylaminoethyl)amine; M = Fe, Co, Ni) and their one-electron-oxidized, semiquinone-bridged analogues [(Me 6 tren) 2 MII2(C 6 H 4 O 2 − ˙)] 3+ . Single-crystal X-ray diffraction shows that the Me 6 tren ligand restrains the metal centers in a trigonal bipyramidal geometry, and coordination of the bridging hydro- or semiquinone ligand results in a parallel alignment of the three-fold axes. We quantify the p -benzosemiquinone–transition metal magnetic exchange coupling for the first time and find that the nickel( ii ) complex exhibits a substantial J < −600 cm −1 , resulting in a well-isolated S = 3/2 ground state even as high as 300 K. The iron and cobalt complexes feature metal–semiquinone exchange constants of J = −144(1) and −252(2) cm −1 ,more »respectively, which are substantially larger in magnitude than those reported for related bis(bidentate) semiquinoid complexes. Finally, the semiquinone-bridged cobalt and nickel complexes exhibit field-induced slow magnetic relaxation, with relaxation barriers of U eff = 22 and 46 cm −1 , respectively. Remarkably, the Orbach relaxation observed for the Ni complex is in stark contrast to the fast processes that dominate relaxation in related mononuclear Ni II complexes, thus demonstrating that strong magnetic coupling can engender slow magnetic relaxation.« less
  4. The known compound K[( PO ) 2 Mn(CO) 2 ] ( PO = 2-((diphenylphosphino)methyl)-4,6-dimethylphenolate) (K[ 1 ]) was protonated to form the new Mn( i ) complex ( HPO )( PO )Mn(CO) 2 ( H 1 ) and was determined to have a p K a approximately equal to tetramethylguanidine (TMG). The reduction potential of K[ 1 ] was determined to be −0.58 V vs. Fc/Fc + in MeCN and allowed for an estimation of an experimental O–H bond dissociation free energy (BDFE O–H ) of 73 kcal mol −1 according to the Bordwell equation. This value is in good agreement with a corrected DFT computed BDFE O–H of 68.0 kcal mol −1 (70.3 kcal mol −1 for intramolecular H-bonded isomer). The coordination of the protonated O-atom in the solid-state H 1 was confirmed using FTIR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography. The phenol moiety is hemilabile as evident from computation and experimental results. For instance, dissociation of the protonated O-atom in H 1 is endergonic by only a few kcal mol −1 (DFT). Furthermore, [ 1 ] − and other Mn( i ) compounds coordinated to PO and/or HPO do not react with MeCN, but H 1 reacts with MeCN tomore »form H 1 + MeCN . Experimental evidence for the solution-bound O-atoms of H 1 was obtained from 1 H NMR and UV-vis spectroscopy and by comparing the electronic spectra of bona fide 16-e − Mn( i ) complexes such as [{ PNP }Mn(CO) 2 ] ( PNP = − N{CH 2 CH 2 (P i Pr 2 )} 2 ) and [( Me3SiOP )( PO )Mn(CO) 2 ] ( Me3Si 1 ). Compound H 1 is only meta-stable ( t 1/2 0.5–1 day) and decomposes into products consistent with homolytic O–H bond cleavage. For instance, treatment of H 1 with TEMPO resulted in formation of TEMPOH, free ligand, and [Mn II {( PO ) 2 Mn(CO) 2 } 2 ]. Together with the experimental and calculated weakened BDFE O–H , these data provide strong evidence for the coordination and hemilability of the protonated O-atom in H 1 and represents the first example of the phenolic Mn( i )–O linkage and a rare example of a “soft-homolysis” intermediate in the bond-weakening catalysis paradigm.« less
  5. The title compounds, [Mo(C 5 H 5 )(COCH 3 )(C 6 H 12 N 3 P)(CO) 2 ], (1), and [Mo(C 5 H 5 )(COCH 3 )(C 9 H 16 N 3 O 2 P)(C 6 H 5 ) 2 ))(CO) 2 ], (2), have been prepared by phosphine-induced migratory insertion from [Mo(C 5 H 5 )(CO) 3 (CH 3 )]. The molecular structures of these complexes are quite similar, exhibiting a four-legged piano-stool geometry with trans -disposed carbonyl ligands. The extended structures of complexes (1) and (2) differ substantially. For complex (1), the molybdenum acetyl unit plays a dominant role in the organization of the extended structure, joining the molecules into centrosymmetrical dimers through C—H...O interactions with a cyclopentadienyl ligand of a neighboring molecule, and these dimers are linked into layers parallel to (100) by C—H...O interactions between the molybdenum acetyl and the cyclopentadienyl ligand of another neighbor. The extended structure of (2) is dominated by C—H...O interactions involving the carbonyl groups of the acetamide groups of the DAPTA ligand, which join the molecules into centrosymmetrical dimers and link them into chains along [010]. Additional C—H...O interactions between the molybdenum acetyl oxygen atom and an acetamide methyl group joinmore »the chains into layers parallel to (101).« less