More Like this

1. Brief Announcement: How Fast Reads Affect Multi-Valued Register Simulations

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3293611.3331580  

   Chaudhuri, Soma; Frank, Reginald; Welch, Jennifer L. (January 2019, Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing)

   We consider the problem of simulating a k-valued register in a wait- free manner using binary registers as building blocks, where k > 2. We show that for any simulation using atomic binary base registers to simulate a safe k-valued register in which the read algorithm takes the optimal number of steps (log_2 k), the write algorithm must take at least log k steps in the worst case. A fortiori, the same lower bound applies when the simulated register should be regular. Previously known algorithms show that both these lower bounds are tight. We also show that in order to simulate an atomic k -valued register for two readers, the optimal number of steps for the read algorithm must be strictly larger than log_2 k. 

   more » « less
2. Constructing many faces in arrangements of lines and segments

   https://doi.org/10.20382/jocg.v14i1a11  

   Wang, Haitao (December 2023, Journal of computational geometry)

   We present new algorithms for computing many faces in arrangements of lines and segments. Given a set $$S$$ of $$n$$ lines (resp., segments) and a set $$P$$ of $$m$$ points in the plane, the problem is to compute the faces of the arrangements of $$S$$ that contain at least one point of $$P$$. For the line case, we give a deterministic algorithm of $$O(m^{2/3}n^{2/3}\log^{2/3} (n/\sqrt{m})+(m+n)\log n)$$ time. This improves the previously best deterministic algorithm [Agarwal, 1990] by a factor of $$\log^{2.22}n$$ and improves the previously best randomized algorithm [Agarwal, Matoušek, and Schwarzkopf, 1998] by a factor of $$\log^{1/3}n$$ in certain cases (e.g., when $$m=\Theta(n)$$). For the segment case, we present a deterministic algorithm of $$O(n^{2/3}m^{2/3}\log n+\tau(n\alpha^2(n)+n\log m+m)\log n)$$ time, where $$\tau=\min\{\log m,\log (n/\sqrt{m})\}$$ and $$\alpha(n)$$ is the inverse Ackermann function. This improves the previously best deterministic algorithm [Agarwal, 1990] by a factor of $$\log^{2.11}n$$ and improves the previously best randomized algorithm [Agarwal, Matoušek, and Schwarzkopf, 1998] by a factor of $$\log n$$ in certain cases (e.g., when $$m=\Theta(n)$$). We also give a randomized algorithm of $$O(m^{2/3}K^{1/3}\log n+\tau(n\alpha(n)+n\log m+m)\log n\log K)$$ expected time, where $$K$$ is the number of intersections of all segments of $$S$$. In addition, we consider the query version of the problem, that is, preprocess $$S$$ to compute the face of the arrangement of $$S$$ that contains any given query point. We present new results that improve the previous work for both the line and the segment cases. In particulary, for the line case, we build a data structure of $$O(n\log n)$$ space in $$O(n\log n)$$ randomized time, so that the face containing the query point can be obtained in $$O(\sqrt{n\log n})$$ time with high probability (more specifically, the query returns a binary search tree representing the face so that standard binary-search-based queries on the face can be handled in $$O(\log n)$$ time each and the face itself can be output explicitly in time linear in its size). 

   more » « less
3. Symmetry Breaking in the CONGEST Model: Time- and Message-Efficient Algorithms for Ruling Sets

   Pai, S; Pandurangan, G; Pemmaraju, S.; Riaz, T; Robinson, P. (October 2017, 31st International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC), 2017)

   We study local symmetry breaking problems in the Congest model, focusing on ruling set problems, which generalize the fundamental Maximal Independent Set (MIS) problem. The time (round) complexity of MIS (and ruling sets) have attracted much attention in the Local model. Indeed, recent results (Barenboim et al., FOCS 2012, Ghaffari SODA 2016) for the MIS problem have tried to break the long-standing O(log n)-round “barrier” achieved by Luby’s algorithm, but these yield o(log n)-round complexity only when the maximum degree
   is somewhat small relative to n. More importantly, these results apply only in the Local model. In fact, the best known time bound in the Congest model is still O(log n) (via Luby’s algorithm) even for moderately small
   (i.e., for
   = (log n) and
   = o(n)). Furthermore, message complexity has been largely ignored in the context of local symmetry breaking. Luby’s algorithm takes O(m) messages on m-edge graphs and this is the best known bound with respect to messages. Our work is motivated by the following central question: can we break the (log n) time complexity barrier and the (m) message complexity barrier in the Congest model for MIS or closelyrelated symmetry breaking problems? This paper presents progress towards this question for the distributed ruling set problem in the Congest model. A -ruling set is an independent set such that every node in the graph is at most hops from a node in the independent set. We present the following results: Time Complexity: We show that we can break the O(log n) “barrier” for 2- and 3-ruling sets. We compute 3-ruling sets in O  log n log log n  rounds with high probability (whp). More generally we show that 2-ruling sets can be computed in O  log
   · (log n)1/2+" + log n log log n  rounds for any " > 0, which is o(log n) for a wide range of
   values (e.g.,
   = 2(log n)1/2−" ). These are the first 2- and 3-ruling set algorithms to improve over the O(log n)-round complexity of Luby’s algorithm in the Congest model. Message Complexity: We show an (n2) lower bound on the message complexity of computing an MIS (i.e., 1-ruling set) which holds also for randomized algorithms and present a contrast to this by showing a randomized algorithm for 2-ruling sets that, whp, uses only O(n log2 n) messages and runs in O(
   log n) rounds. This is the first message-efficient algorithm known for ruling sets, which has message complexity nearly linear in n (which is optimal up to a polylogarithmic factor). 

   more » « less
4. Symmetry Breaking in the Congest Model: Time- and Message-Efficient Algorithms for Ruling Sets

   https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2017.38  

   Pai, Shreyas; Pandurangan, Gopal; Pemmaraju, Sriram V.; Riaz, Talal; Robinson, Peter (October 2017, 31st International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC))

   We study local symmetry breaking problems in the Congest model, focusing on ruling set problems, which generalize the fundamental Maximal Independent Set (MIS) problem. The time (round) complexity of MIS (and ruling sets) have attracted much attention in the Local model. Indeed, recent results (Barenboim et al., FOCS 2012, Ghaffari SODA 2016) for the MIS problem have tried to break the long-standing O(log n)-round "barrier" achieved by Luby's algorithm, but these yield o(log n)-round complexity only when the maximum degree Delta is somewhat small relative to n. More importantly, these results apply only in the Local model. In fact, the best known time bound in the Congest model is still O(log n) (via Luby's algorithm) even for moderately small Delta (i.e., for Delta = Omega(log n) and Delta = o(n)). Furthermore, message complexity has been largely ignored in the context of local symmetry breaking. Luby's algorithm takes O(m) messages on m-edge graphs and this is the best known bound with respect to messages. Our work is motivated by the following central question: can we break the Theta(log n) time complexity barrier and the Theta(m) message complexity barrier in the Congest model for MIS or closely-related symmetry breaking problems? This paper presents progress towards this question for the distributed ruling set problem in the Congest model. A beta-ruling set is an independent set such that every node in the graph is at most beta hops from a node in the independent set. We present the following results: - Time Complexity: We show that we can break the O(log n) "barrier" for 2- and 3-ruling sets. We compute 3-ruling sets in O(log n/log log n) rounds with high probability (whp). More generally we show that 2-ruling sets can be computed in O(log Delta (log n)^(1/2 + epsilon) + log n/log log n) rounds for any epsilon > 0, which is o(log n) for a wide range of Delta values (e.g., Delta = 2^(log n)^(1/2-epsilon)). These are the first 2- and 3-ruling set algorithms to improve over the O(log n)-round complexity of Luby's algorithm in the Congest model. - Message Complexity: We show an Omega(n^2) lower bound on the message complexity of computing an MIS (i.e., 1-ruling set) which holds also for randomized algorithms and present a contrast to this by showing a randomized algorithm for 2-ruling sets that, whp, uses only O(n log^2 n) messages and runs in O(Delta log n) rounds. This is the first message-efficient algorithm known for ruling sets, which has message complexity nearly linear in n (which is optimal up to a polylogarithmic factor). 

   more » « less
5. On the Line-Separable Unit-Disk Coverage and Related Problems

   https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2023.51  

   Liu, Gang; Wang, Haitao (November 2023, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik)

   Iwata, Satoru; Kakimura, Naonori (Ed.)

   Given a set P of n points and a set S of m disks in the plane, the disk coverage problem asks for a smallest subset of disks that together cover all points of P. The problem is NP-hard. In this paper, we consider a line-separable unit-disk version of the problem where all disks have the same radius and their centers are separated from the points of P by a line 𝓁. We present an m^{2/3} n^{2/3} 2^O(log^*(m+n)) + O((n+m)log(n+m)) time algorithm for the problem. This improves the previously best result of O(nm + n log n) time. Our techniques also solve the line-constrained version of the problem, where centers of all disks of S are located on a line 𝓁 while points of P can be anywhere in the plane. Our algorithm runs in O(m√n + (n+m)log(n+m)) time, which improves the previously best result of O(nm log(m+n)) time. In addition, our results lead to an algorithm of n^{10/3} 2^O(log^*n) time for a half-plane coverage problem (given n half-planes and n points, find a smallest subset of half-planes covering all points); this improves the previously best algorithm of O(n⁴log n) time. Further, if all half-planes are lower ones, our algorithm runs in n^{4/3} 2^O(log^*n) time while the previously best algorithm takes O(n²log n) time. 

   more » « less