More Like this

1. Synchronization Strings: Codes for Insertions and Deletions Approaching the Singleton Bound

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3468265  

   Haeupler, Bernhard; Shahrasbi, Amirbehshad (October 2021, Journal of the ACM)

   We introduce synchronization strings , which provide a novel way to efficiently deal with synchronization errors , i.e., insertions and deletions. Synchronization errors are strictly more general and much harder to cope with than more commonly considered Hamming-type errors , i.e., symbol substitutions and erasures. For every ε > 0, synchronization strings allow us to index a sequence with an ε -O(1) -size alphabet, such that one can efficiently transform k synchronization errors into (1 + ε)k Hamming-type errors . This powerful new technique has many applications. In this article, we focus on designing insdel codes , i.e., error correcting block codes (ECCs) for insertion-deletion channels. While ECCs for both Hamming-type errors and synchronization errors have been intensely studied, the latter has largely resisted progress. As Mitzenmacher puts it in his 2009 survey [30]: “ Channels with synchronization errors...are simply not adequately understood by current theory. Given the near-complete knowledge, we have for channels with erasures and errors...our lack of understanding about channels with synchronization errors is truly remarkable. ” Indeed, it took until 1999 for the first insdel codes with constant rate, constant distance, and constant alphabet size to be constructed and only since 2016 are there constructions of constant rate insdel codes for asymptotically large noise rates. Even in the asymptotically large or small noise regimes, these codes are polynomially far from the optimal rate-distance tradeoff. This makes the understanding of insdel codes up to this work equivalent to what was known for regular ECCs after Forney introduced concatenated codes in his doctoral thesis 50 years ago. A straightforward application of our synchronization strings-based indexing method gives a simple black-box construction that transforms any ECC into an equally efficient insdel code with only a small increase in the alphabet size. This instantly transfers much of the highly developed understanding for regular ECCs into the realm of insdel codes. Most notably, for the complete noise spectrum, we obtain efficient “near-MDS” insdel codes, which get arbitrarily close to the optimal rate-distance tradeoff given by the Singleton bound. In particular, for any δ ∈ (0,1) and ε > 0, we give a family of insdel codes achieving a rate of 1 - δ - ε over a constant-size alphabet that efficiently corrects a δ fraction of insertions or deletions. 

   more » « less
2. Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs):50th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2023)

   https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2023.41  

   Cheng, Kuan; Jin, Zhengzhong; Li, Xin; Wei, Zhide; Zheng, Yu (January 2023, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik)

   Etessami, Kousha; Feige, Uriel; Puppis, Gabriele (Ed.)

   This work continues the study of linear error correcting codes against adversarial insertion deletion errors (insdel errors). Previously, the work of Cheng, Guruswami, Haeupler, and Li [Kuan Cheng et al., 2021] showed the existence of asymptotically good linear insdel codes that can correct arbitrarily close to 1 fraction of errors over some constant size alphabet, or achieve rate arbitrarily close to 1/2 even over the binary alphabet. As shown in [Kuan Cheng et al., 2021], these bounds are also the best possible. However, known explicit constructions in [Kuan Cheng et al., 2021], and subsequent improved constructions by Con, Shpilka, and Tamo [Con et al., 2022] all fall short of meeting these bounds. Over any constant size alphabet, they can only achieve rate < 1/8 or correct < 1/4 fraction of errors; over the binary alphabet, they can only achieve rate < 1/1216 or correct < 1/54 fraction of errors. Apparently, previous techniques face inherent barriers to achieve rate better than 1/4 or correct more than 1/2 fraction of errors. In this work we give new constructions of such codes that meet these bounds, namely, asymptotically good linear insdel codes that can correct arbitrarily close to 1 fraction of errors over some constant size alphabet, and binary asymptotically good linear insdel codes that can achieve rate arbitrarily close to 1/2. All our constructions are efficiently encodable and decodable. Our constructions are based on a novel approach of code concatenation, which embeds the index information implicitly into codewords. This significantly differs from previous techniques and may be of independent interest. Finally, we also prove the existence of linear concatenated insdel codes with parameters that match random linear codes, and propose a conjecture about linear insdel codes. 

   more » « less
3. Locally Decodable/Correctable Codes for Insertions and Deletions

   https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2020.16  

   Block, A; Blocki, J; Grigorescu, E; Kulkarni, S; Zhu, M. (January 2020, 40th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science)

   Recent efforts in coding theory have focused on building codes for insertions and deletions, called insdel codes, with optimal trade-offs between their redundancy and their error-correction capabilities, as well as {\em efficient} encoding and decoding algorithms. In many applications, polynomial running time may still be prohibitively expensive, which has motivated the study of codes with {\em super-efficient} decoding algorithms. These have led to the well-studied notions of Locally Decodable Codes (LDCs) and Locally Correctable Codes (LCCs). Inspired by these notions, Ostrovsky and Paskin-Cherniavsky (Information Theoretic Security, 2015) generalized Hamming LDCs to insertions and deletions. To the best of our knowledge, these are the only known results that study the analogues of Hamming LDCs in channels performing insertions and deletions. Here we continue the study of insdel codes that admit local algorithms. Specifically, we reprove the results of Ostrovsky and Paskin-Cherniavsky for insdel LDCs using a different set of techniques. We also observe that the techniques extend to constructions of LCCs. Specifically, we obtain insdel LDCs and LCCs from their Hamming LDCs and LCCs analogues, respectively. The rate and error-correction capability blow up only by a constant factor, while the query complexity blows up by a poly log factor in the block length. Since insdel locally decodable/correctble codes are scarcely studied in the literature, we believe our results and techniques may lead to further research. In particular, we conjecture that constant-query insdel LDCs/LCCs do not exist. 

   more » « less
4. Deletions and Insertions of the Symbol “0” and Asymmetric/Unidirectional Error Control Codes for the L Metric

   https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2022.3203594  

   Tallini, Luca G; Alqwaifly, Nawaf; Bose, Bella (January 2023, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory)

   This paper gives some theory and efficient design of binary block codes capable of controlling the deletions of the symbol “0” (referred to as 0-deletions) and/or the insertions of the symbol “0” (referred to as 0-insertions). This problem of controlling 0-deletions and/or 0-insertions (referred to as 0-errors) is shown to be equivalent to the efficient design of L1 metric asymmetric error control codes over the natural alphabet, IIN . In this way, it is shown that the t0 -insertion correcting codes are actually capable of controlling much more; namely, they can correct t0 -errors, detect (t+1)0 -errors and, simultaneously, detect all occurrences of only 0-deletions or only 0-insertions in every received word (briefly, they are t -Symmetric 0-Error Correcting/ (t+1) -Symmetric 0-Error Detecting/All Unidirectional 0-Error Detecting ( t -Sy0EC/ (t+1) -Sy0ED/AU0ED) codes). From the relations with the L1 distance error control codes, new improved bounds are given for the optimal t0 -error correcting codes. Optimal non-systematic code designs are given. Decoding can be efficiently performed by algebraic means using the Extended Euclidean Algorithm (EEA). 

   more » « less
5. Near-linear time insertion-deletion codes and (1+ ε)-approximating edit distance via indexing

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3313276.3316371  

   Haeupler, Bernhard; Rubinstein, Aviad; Shahrasbi, Amirbehshad (April 2019, ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing)

   We introduce fast-decodable indexing schemes for edit distance which can be used to speed up edit distance computations to near-linear time if one of the strings is indexed by an indexing string I. In particular, for every length n and every ε >0, one can in near linear time construct a string I ∈ Σ′n with |Σ′| = Oε(1), such that, indexing any string S ∈ Σn, symbol-by-symbol, with I results in a string S′ ∈ Σ″n where Σ″ = Σ × Σ′ for which edit distance computations are easy, i.e., one can compute a (1+ε)-approximation of the edit distance between S′ and any other string in O(n (log n)) time. Our indexing schemes can be used to improve the decoding complexity of state-of-the-art error correcting codes for insertions and deletions. In particular, they lead to near-linear time decoding algorithms for the insertion-deletion codes of [Haeupler, Shahrasbi; STOC ‘17] and faster decoding algorithms for list-decodable insertion-deletion codes of [Haeupler, Shahrasbi, Sudan; ICALP ‘18]. Interestingly, the latter codes are a crucial ingredient in the construction of fast-decodable indexing schemes. 

   more » « less