skip to main content

Search for: All records

Award ID contains: 1527110

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Network design problems aim to compute low-cost structures such as routes, trees and subgraphs. Often, it is natural and desirable to require that these structures have small hop length or hop diameter. Unfortunately, optimization problems with hop constraints are much harder and less well understood than their hop-unconstrained counterparts. A significant algorithmic barrier in this setting is the fact that hop-constrained distances in graphs are very far from being a metric. We show that, nonetheless, hop-constrained distances can be approximated by distributions over ``partial tree metrics.'' We build this result into a powerful and versatile algorithmic tool which, similarly to classic probabilistic tree embeddings, reduces hop-constrained problems in general graphs to hop-unconstrained problems on trees. We then use this tool to give the first poly-logarithmic bicriteria approximations for the hop-constrained variants of many classic network design problems. These include Steiner forest, group Steiner tree, group Steiner forest, buy-at-bulk network design as well as online and oblivious versions of many of these problems.
  2. We prove the existence of an oblivious routing scheme that is poly(logn)-competitive in terms of (congestion + dilation), thus resolving a well-known question in oblivious routing. Concretely, consider an undirected network and a set of packets each with its own source and destination. The objective is to choose a path for each packet, from its source to its destination, so as to minimize (congestion + dilation), defined as follows: The dilation is the maximum path hop-length, and the congestion is the maximum number of paths that include any single edge. The routing scheme obliviously and randomly selects a path for each packet independent of (the existence of) the other packets. Despite this obliviousness, the selected paths have (congestion + dilation) within a poly(logn) factor of the best possible value. More precisely, for any integer hop-bound h, this oblivious routing scheme selects paths of length at most h · poly(logn) and is poly(logn)-competitive in terms of congestion in comparison to the best possible congestion achievable via paths of length at most h hops. These paths can be sampled in polynomial time. This result can be viewed as an analogue of the celebrated oblivious routing results of R'acke [FOCS 2002, STOC 2008],more »which are O(logn)-competitive in terms of congestion, but are not competitive in terms of dilation.« less
  3. Many distributed optimization algorithms achieve existentially-optimal running times, meaning that there exists some pathological worst-case topology on which no algorithm can do better. Still, most networks of interest allow for exponentially faster algorithms. This motivates two questions: (i) What network topology parameters determine the complexity of distributed optimization? (ii) Are there universally-optimal algorithms that are as fast as possible on every topology? We resolve these 25-year-old open problems in the known-topology setting (i.e., supported CONGEST) for a wide class of global network optimization problems including MST, (1+є)-min cut, various approximate shortest paths problems, sub-graph connectivity, etc. In particular, we provide several (equivalent) graph parameters and show they are tight universal lower bounds for the above problems, fully characterizing their inherent complexity. Our results also imply that algorithms based on the low-congestion shortcut framework match the above lower bound, making them universally optimal if shortcuts are efficiently approximable.