skip to main content

Title: Stress-Free Evolution: The Nrf-Coordinated Oxidative Stress Response in Early Diverging Metazoans
Abstract Environmental stress from ultraviolet radiation, elevated temperatures or metal toxicity can lead to reactive oxygen species in cells, leading to oxidative DNA damage, premature aging, neurodegenerative diseases, and cancer. The transcription factor nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (Nrf2) activates many cytoprotective proteins within the nucleus to maintain homeostasis during oxidative stress. In vertebrates, Nrf2 levels are regulated by the Kelch-family protein Keap1 (Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1) in the absence of stress according to a canonical redox control pathway. Little, however, is known about the redox control pathway used in early diverging metazoans. Our study examines the presence of known oxidative stress regulatory elements within non-bilaterian metazoans including free living and parasitic cnidarians, ctenophores, placozoans, and sponges. Cnidarians, with their pivotal position as the sister phylum to bilaterians, play an important role in understanding the evolutionary history of response to oxidative stress. Through comparative genomic and transcriptomic analysis our results show that Nrf homologs evolved early in metazoans, whereas Keap1 appeared later in the last common ancestor of cnidarians and bilaterians. However, key Nrf–Keap1 interacting domains are not conserved within the cnidarian lineage, suggesting this important pathway evolved with the radiation of bilaterians. Several known downstream Nrf targets are present more » in cnidarians suggesting that cnidarian Nrf plays an important role in oxidative stress response even in the absence of Keap1. Comparative analyses of key oxidative stress sensing and response proteins in early diverging metazoans thus provide important insights into the molecular basis of how these lineages interact with their environment and suggest a shared evolutionary history of regulatory pathways. Exploration of these pathways may prove important for the study of cancer therapeutics and broader research in oxidative stress, senescence, and the functional responses of early diverging metazoans to environmental change. « less
Authors:
; ; ;
Award ID(s):
1831860
Publication Date:
NSF-PAR ID:
10123161
Journal Name:
Integrative and Comparative Biology
Volume:
59
Issue:
4
Page Range or eLocation-ID:
799 to 810
ISSN:
1540-7063
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Breast and mammary epithelial cells experience different local environments during tissue development and tumorigenesis. Microenvironmental heterogeneity gives rise to distinct cell regulatory states whose identity and importance are just beginning to be appreciated. Cellular states diversify when clonal three-dimensional (3D) spheroids are cultured in basement membrane, and one such state is associated with stress tolerance and poor response to anticancer therapeutics. Here, we found that this state was jointly coordinated by the NRF2 and p53 pathways, which were costabilized by spontaneous oxidative stress within 3D cultures. Inhibition of NRF2 or p53 individually disrupted some of the transcripts defining the regulatory state but did not yield a notable phenotype in nontransformed breast epithelial cells. In contrast, combined perturbation prevented 3D growth in an oxidative stress–dependent manner. By integrating systems models of NRF2 and p53 signaling in a single oxidative stress network, we recapitulated these observations and made predictions about oxidative stress profiles during 3D growth. NRF2 and p53 signaling were similarly coordinated in normal breast epithelial tissue and hormone-negative ductal carcinoma in situ lesions but were uncoupled in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a subtype in which p53 is usually mutated. Using the integrated model, we correlated the extent of this uncouplingmore »in TNBC cell lines with the importance of NRF2 in the 3D growth of these cell lines and their predicted handling of oxidative stress. Our results point to an oxidative stress tolerance network that is important for single cells during glandular development and the early stages of breast cancer.« less
  2. Abstract The environment in which eukaryotes first evolved was drastically different from what they experience today, and one of the key limiting factors was the availability of oxygen for mitochondrial respiration. During the transition to a fully oxygenated Earth, other compounds such as sulfide posed a considerable constraint on using mitochondrial aerobic respiration for energy production. The ancestors of animals, and those that first evolved from the simpler eukaryotes have mitochondrial respiratory components that are absent from later-evolving animals. Specifically, mitochondria of most basal metazoans have a sulfide-resistant alternative oxidase (AOX), which provides a secondary oxidative pathway to the classical cytochrome pathway. In this essay, I argue that because of its resistance to sulfide, AOX respiration was critical to the evolution of animals by enabling oxidative metabolism under otherwise inhibitory conditions. I hypothesize that AOX allowed for metabolic flexibility during the stochastic oxygen environment of early Earth which shaped the evolution of basal metazoans. I briefly describe the known functions of AOX, with a particular focus on the decreased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) during stress conditions. Then, I propose three evolutionary consequences of AOX-mediated protection from ROS observed in basal metazoans: 1) adaptation to stressful environments, 2) themore »persistence of facultative sexual reproduction, and 3) decreased mitochondrial DNA mutation rates. Recognizing the diversity of mitochondrial respiratory systems present in animals may help resolve the mechanisms involved in major evolutionary processes such as adaptation and speciation.« less
  3. Most animals – including birds, fish and mammals – have symmetrical left and right sides, and are known as bilaterians. During early life, the embryos of animals in this group develop three distinct layers of cells: the ectoderm (outer layer), the endoderm (inner layer), and the mesoderm (middle layer). These layers then go on to form the animal’s tissues and organs. The ectoderm produces external tissues, such as the skin and the nervous system; the endoderm forms internal tissues, like the gut; and the mesoderm creates all tissues in between, like muscles and blood. Another, smaller group of animals, called cnidarians, do not have left and right sides. Instead, they have a ‘radial symmetry’, meaning they have multiple identical parts arranged in a circle. These animals – which include corals, jellyfish and sea anemones – only develop two distinct layers of cells, equivalent to the outer and inner layers of bilaterians. Cnidarians evolved before bilaterians, but their genetic material is equally complex. So why did these two groups evolve to have different layers of cells? And how exactly do animal embryos develop these distinct layers? To address these questions, Salinas-Saavedra et al. studied embryos of the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis.more »Molecules called Par-proteins play an important role in controlling how cells behave and attach to one another (and therefore how they form layers). So, using a technique called immunohistochemistry to look inside cells, Salinas-Saavedra et al. examined these proteins in the two layers of cells in sea anemone embryos. The experiments found that in the sea anemones, Par-proteins are arranged differently in cells that form the ‘skin’ compared to cells that form the ‘gut’. In other words, cells in the outer layer attach to one another in a different way than cells in the inner layer, where the Par-proteins are degraded by ‘mesodermal’ genes. The findings also show that these sea anemones have all they need to form a third middle layer of cells. Like bilaterians, they could potentially move cells in and out of sheets that line surfaces inside the body – but they do not naturally do this. Understanding how animals form different layers of cells is important for scientists studying evolution and the development of embryos. However, it also has wider applications. For instance, some cells involved in developing the mesoderm are also involved in forming tumors. Future research in this area could help scientists learn more about how cancer-like cells form in animals.« less
  4. A surge in the accumulation of oxidants generates shifts in the cellular redox potential during early stages of plant infection with pathogens and activation of effector-triggered immunity (ETI). The redoxome, defined as the proteome-wide oxidative modifications of proteins caused by oxidants, has a well-known impact on stress responses in metazoans. However, the identity of proteins and the residues sensitive to oxidation during the plant immune response remain largely unknown. Previous studies of the thimet oligopeptidases TOP1 and TOP2 placed them in the salicylic acid dependent branch of ETI, with a current model wherein TOPs sustain interconnected organellar and cytosolic pathways that modulate the oxidative burst and development of cell death. Herein, we characterized the ETI redoxomes in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) wild-type Col-0 and top1top2 mutant plants using a differential alkylation-based enrichment technique coupled with label-free mass spectrometry-based quantification. We identified cysteines sensitive to oxidation in a wide range of protein families at multiple time points after pathogen infection. Differences were detected between Col-0 and top1top2 redoxomes regarding the identity and number of oxidized cysteines, and the amplitude of time-dependent fluctuations in protein oxidation. Our results support a determining role for TOPs in maintaining the proper level and dynamics of proteomemore »oxidation during ETI. This study significantly expands the repertoire of oxidation-sensitive plant proteins and can guide future mechanistic studies.« less
  5. This Research Topic on innate immunity was motivated by the need to expand our knowledge of innate immunity and general immune responses in early diverging metazoans, such as cnidarians, placozoans, sponges, and ctenophores (Figure 1). Previous immunological studies in vertebrates and invertebrates, such as Drosophila, C. elegan and shellfish (1–5), launched the field of comparative invertebrate immunology. However, as this field flourished there remained an unbalanced focus on bilaterian models, limiting a broader understanding of the evolution and diversity of metazoan innate immune processes. Throughout the Metazoa there are undoubtedly shared core mechanisms of immunity, as well as uniquely evolved lineage specific mechanisms that remain undiscovered and thus hidden from our view. With this Research Topic, we provided a virtual space to assemble interesting studies that begin to address this critical knowledge gap and present them to readers of Frontiers of Immunology.