skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Editable AI: Mixed Human-AI Authoring of Code Patterns
Developers authoring HTML documents define elements following patterns which establish and reflect the visual structure of a document, such as making all images in a footer the same height by applying a class to each. To surface these patterns to developers and support developers in authoring consistent with these patterns, we propose a mixed human-AI technique for creating code patterns. Patterns are first learned from individual HTML documents through a decision tree, generating a representation which developers may view and edit. Code patterns are used to offer developers autocomplete suggestions, list examples, and flag violations. To evaluate our technique, we conducted a user study in which 24 participants wrote, edited, and corrected HTML documents. We found that our technique enabled developers to edit and correct documents more quickly and create, edit, and correct documents more successfully.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1757064
PAR ID:
10133400
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
2019 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)
Page Range / eLocation ID:
35 to 43
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; (, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages)
    We present an evaluation update (or simply, update) algorithm for a full-featured functional programming language, which synthesizes program changes based on output changes. Intuitively, the update algorithm retraces the steps of the original evaluation, rewriting the program as needed to reconcile differences between the original and updated output values. Our approach, furthermore, allows expert users to define custom lenses that augment the update algorithm with more advanced or domain-specific program updates. To demonstrate the utility of evaluation update, we implement the algorithm in Sketch-n-Sketch, a novel direct manipulation programming system for generating HTML documents. In Sketch-n-Sketch, the user writes an ML-style functional program to generate HTML output. When the user directly manipulates the output using a graphical user interface, the update algorithm reconciles the changes. We evaluate bidirectional evaluation in Sketch-n-Sketch by authoring ten examples comprising approximately 1400 lines of code in total. These examples demonstrate how a variety of HTML documents and applications can be developed and edited interactively in Sketch-n-Sketch, mitigating the tedious edit-run-view cycle in traditional programming environments. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; (, Proceedings of 5th Workshop on Human-AI Co-Creation with Generative Models (HA-GEN 20224) at IUI 2024)
    Worked examples (solutions to typical programming problems presented as a source code in a certain language and are used to explain the topics from a programming class) are among the most popular types of learning content in programming classes. Most approaches and tools for presenting these examples to students are based on line-by-line explanations of the example code. However, instructors rarely have time to provide line-by-line explanations for a large number of examples typically used in a programming class. In this paper, we explore and assess a human-AI collaboration approach to authoring worked examples for Java programming. We introduce an authoring system for creating Java worked examples that generates a starting version of code explanations and presents it to the instructor to edit if necessary. We also present a study that assesses the quality of explanations created with this approach. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; (, Proceedings of ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC 2024)
    Worked examples are among the most popular types of learning content in programming classes. However, instructors rarely have time to provide line-by-line explanations for a large number of examples typically used in a programming class. In this paper, we explore and assess a human-AI collaboration approach to authoring worked examples for Java programming. We introduce an authoring system for creating Java worked examples that generate a starting version of code explanations and presents it to the instructor to edit if necessary. We also present a study that assesses the quality of explanations created with this approach. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; (, CEUR Workshop Proceedings)
    Worked code examples are among the most popular types of learning content in programming classes. Most approaches and tools for presenting these examples to students are based on line-by-line explanations of the example code. However, instructors rarely have time to provide line-by-line explanations of a large number of examples typically used in a programming class. This paper explores the opportunity to facilitate the development of worked examples for Java programming through a human-AI collaborative authoring approach. The idea of collaborative authoring is to generate a starting version of code explanations using LLM and present it to the instructor to edit if necessary. The critical step towards implementing this idea is to ensure that LLM can produce code explanations that look meaningful and acceptable to instructors and students. To achieve this goal, we performed an extensive prompt engineering study and evaluated the explanation produced by the selected prompt in a user study with students and authors. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; (, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology)
    Continuous Integration (CI) practices encourage developers to frequently integrate code into a shared repository. Each integration is validated by automatic build and testing such that errors are revealed as early as possible. When CI failures or integration errors are reported, existing techniques are insufficient to automatically locate the root causes for two reasons. First, a CI failure may be triggered by faults in source code and/or build scripts, while current approaches consider only source code. Second, a tentative integration can fail because of build failures and/or test failures, while existing tools focus on test failures only. This paper presents UniLoc, the first unified technique to localize faults in both source code and build scripts given a CI failure log, without assuming the failure’s location (source code or build scripts) and nature (a test failure or not). Adopting the information retrieval (IR) strategy, UniLoc locates buggy files by treating source code and build scripts as documents to search and by considering build logs as search queries. However, instead of naïvely applying an off-the-shelf IR technique to these software artifacts, for more accurate fault localization, UniLoc applies various domain-specific heuristics to optimize the search queries, search space, and ranking formulas. To evaluate UniLoc, we gathered 700 CI failure fixes in 72 open-source projects that are built with Gradle. UniLoc could effectively locate bugs with the average MRR (Mean Reciprocal Rank) value as 0.49, MAP (Mean Average Precision) value as 0.36, and NDCG (Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain) value as 0.54. UniLoc outperformed the state-of-the-art IR-based tool BLUiR and Locus. UniLoc has the potential to help developers diagnose root causes for CI failures more accurately and efficiently. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email