Biodiesel is an eco-friendly renewable fuel that can be derived from microalgae. Maximization of biomass and lipid productivities are considered the main challenges for algal biodiesel production. Since conventional batch cultures are time-, space-, and reagent-consuming with many restrictions to apply many replicates, microfluidic technology has recently emerged as an alternative low-cost and efficient technology with high throughput repeatability and reproducibility. Different applications of microfluidic devices in algal biotechnology have been reported, including cell identification, sorting, trapping, and metabolic screening. In this work, Chlorella vulgaris was investigated by encapsulating in a simple droplet-based micro-array device at different light intensities of 20, 80, and 200 µmol/m2/s combined with different nitrate concentrations of 17.6, 8.8, and 4.4 mM. The growth results for C. vulgaris within microfluidic device were compared to the conventional batch culture method. In addition, the effect of combined stress of deficiencies in irradiance and nitrogen availability were studied to illustrate their impact on the metabolic profiling of microalgae. The results showed that the most optimum favorable culturing conditions for Chlorella vulgaris growth within the microfluidic channels were 17.6 mM and 80 µmol/m2/s.
more »
« less
Extraction and Characterization of Lipids from Macroalgae
Although most algal biofuel research has focused on microalgae, macroalgae are also potential sources of lipid for the production of biodiesel and other liquid fuels. Reliable, accurate methods for assessing the lipid composition of biomass are essential for the development of macroalgae in this area. The conventional methods most commonly used to evaluate lipid composition, such as those of Bligh and Dyer and Folch, do not provide complete extraction of lipids in photosynthetic cells/tissues and therefore do not provide an accurate accounting of lipid production. Here we present a 2-EE lipid extraction protocol, a method which has been demonstrated to be superior to conventional lipid extraction methods for microalgae, adapted for use with macroalgae.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1755220
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10157683
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Methods in molecular biology
- Issue:
- 1995
- ISSN:
- 0097-0816
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 131-140
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
null (Ed.)Many unicellular microorganisms including yeasts, fungi, microalgae, and to a lesser extent bacteria (Fig. 1), can produce intra- cellular edible oils under normal and specialized conditions (Papanikolaou and Aggelis, 2011). Most of these organisms can accumulate microbial lipids, or single-cell oils (SCOs), to 20%–90% (w/w) of their dry cell biomass. For example, fungi in the genus Mortierella and Umbelopsis can accumulate lipids at concentrations that exceed 86% of their dry weight (Meng et al., 2009). Microbial lipids can be produced using low-priced organic materials, including waste-streams from the food industry, as growth substrate. The fatty acid of microbial lipids is very similar to the conventional vegetable oils in type and composition (Madani et al., 2017). Furthermore, microbial lipids have many potential applications, including human food additives, nutraceuticals, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, biopolymers and feed ingredients for aquaculture, and as an alternative feedstock for the production of biofuel (Lewis et al., 2000). Due to the reduced availability of cultivable land and increasing human population growth, producing lipids via traditional methods will not satisfy the rapidly growing global demand. Therefore, microbial lipids accu- mulated from microorganisms, especially oleaginous fungi, are considered as a vital and renewable oil resource and have been regarded as an alternative to animal and plant lipids in recent years, given their unique characteristics and functions in energy, chemical, and food industries (Huang et al., 2017). The production of microbial lipids is particularly attractive when low or negative cost substrates are used as the feedstock.more » « less
-
more » « less
Phytoplankton and sea ice algae are traditionally considered to be the main primary producers in the Arctic Ocean. In this Perspective, we explore the importance of benthic primary producers (BPPs) encompassing microalgae, macroalgae, and seagrasses, which represent a poorly quantified source of Arctic marine primary production. Despite scarce observations, models predict that BPPs are widespread, colonizing ~3 million km2of the extensive Arctic coastal and shelf seas. Using a synthesis of published data and a novel model, we estimate that BPPs currently contribute ~77 Tg C y−1of primary production to the Arctic, equivalent to ~20 to 35% of annual phytoplankton production. Macroalgae contribute ~43 Tg C y−1, seagrasses contribute ~23 Tg C y−1, and microalgae-dominated shelf habitats contribute ~11 to 16 Tg C y−1. Since 2003, the Arctic seafloor area exposed to sunlight has increased by ~47,000 km2y−1, expanding the realm of BPPs in a warming Arctic. Increased macrophyte abundance and productivity is expected along Arctic coastlines with continued ocean warming and sea ice loss. However, microalgal benthic primary production has increased in only a few shelf regions despite substantial sea ice loss over the past 20 y, as higher solar irradiance in the ice-free ocean is counterbalanced by reduced water transparency. This suggests complex impacts of climate change on Arctic light availability and marine primary production. Despite significant knowledge gaps on Arctic BPPs, their widespread presence and obvious contribution to coastal and shelf ecosystem production call for further investigation and for their inclusion in Arctic ecosystem models and carbon budgets.
-
null (Ed.)Society has long been exposed to naturally-occurring nanoparticles. Due to their ubiquitous nature, biological systems have adapted and built protection against their potential effects. However, for the past decades, there have been onslaughts of newly engineered nanoparticles being released in the environment with no known effects on ecosystems. Although these materials offer distinct advantages in manufacturing processes, such as odor-free fabric or controlled drug delivery, their fate in nature has yet to be thoroughly investigated. As the size of an already-large NPs market is expected to grow, due to advances in synthetic biology, it is vital that we increase our understanding of their impacts on human, food and natural ecosystems. Recent studies have shown that NPs affect phytoplankton biomass and diversity in the ocean, solely by regulating micronutrients bioavailability. These types of changes could ultimately impact several biogeochemical cycles, as phytoplankton are responsible for almost half of the primary production on earth. Consequently, this study was designed to evaluate the impact of various concentrations (0μM, 20μM, 40μM, 80μM and 100μM) of several manufactured nanoparticles (gold, carbon and iron) on the dynamics of four economically important microalgae strains. Responses, such as chlorophyll content, protein, lipid content, lipid profile, biomass and cell morphology were monitored over a period of two weeks. No significant acute toxicity was exhibited within the first 24 hours of exposure. However, after 4 days, a remarkably high mortality rate was detected with increasing NPs concentrations of Fe60, C80 and Au60. Iron suspensions were found to be more toxic to the microalgae strains tested than those of Gold and Carbon under comparable regimes. Further investigations with other, either positively or negatively charged nanoparticles, should provide a deeper understanding on the impacts on these engineered materials in our ecosystems.more » « less
-
Society has long been exposed to naturally-occurring nanoparticles. Due to their ubiquitous nature, biological systems have adapted and built protection against their potential effects. However, for the past decades, there have been onslaughts of newly engineered nanoparticles being released in the environment with no known effects on ecosystems. Although these materials offer distinct advantages in manufacturing processes, such as odor-free fabric or controlled drug delivery, their fate in nature has yet to be thoroughly investigated. As the size of an already-large NPs market is expected to grow, due to advances in synthetic biology, it is vital that we increase our understanding of their impacts on human, food and natural ecosystems. Recent studies have shown that NPs affect phytoplankton biomass and diversity in the ocean, solely by regulating micronutrients bioavailability. These types of changes could ultimately impact several biogeochemical cycles, as phytoplankton are responsible for almost half of the primary production on earth. Consequently, this study was designed to evaluate the impact of various concentrations (0µM, 20µM, 40µM, 80µM and 100µM) of several manufactured nanoparticles (gold, carbon and iron) on the dynamics of four economically important microalgae strains. Responses, such as chlorophyll content, protein, lipid content, lipid profile, biomass and cell morphology were monitored over a period of two weeks. No significant acute toxicity was exhibited within the first 24 hours of exposure. However, after 4 days, a remarkably high mortality rate was detected with increasing NPs concentrations of Fe60, C80 and Au60. Iron suspensions were found to be more toxic to the microalgae strains tested than those of Gold and Carbon under comparable regimes. Further investigations with other, either positively or negatively charged nanoparticles, should provide a deeper understanding on the impacts on these engineered materials in our ecosystems.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9484-7_7
