More Like this

1. Vertex degree sums for perfect matchings in 3-uniform hypergraphs

   Zhang, Yi and (September 2018, The Electronic journal of combinatorics)

   We determine the minimum degree sum of two adjacent vertices that ensures a perfect matching in a 3-uniform hypergraph without isolated vertex. Suppose that $$H$$ is a 3-uniform hypergraph whose order $$n$$ is sufficiently large and divisible by $$3$$. If $$H$$ contains no isolated vertex and $$\deg(u)+\deg(v) > \frac{2}{3}n^2-\frac{8}{3}n+2$$ for any two vertices $$u$$ and $$v$$ that are contained in some edge of $$H$$, then $$H$$ contains a perfect matching. This bound is tight and the (unique) extremal hyergraph is a different \emph{space barrier} from the one for the corresponding Dirac problem. 

   more » « less
2. Individual differences and long-term consequences of tDCS augmented cognitive training

   Katz, B.; Au, J.; Buschkuehl, M.; Abagis, T.; Zabel, C.; Jaeggi, S.; Jonides, J. (October 2017, Journal of cognitive neuroscience)

   A gr e at d e al of i nt er e st s urr o u n d s t h e u s e of tr a n s cr a ni al dir e ct c urr e nt sti m ul ati o n (t D C S) t o a u g m e nt c o g niti v e tr ai ni n g. H o w e v er, eff e ct s ar e i n c o n si st e nt a cr o s s st u di e s, a n d m et aa n al yti c e vi d e n c e i s mi x e d, e s p e ci all y f o r h e alt h y, y o u n g a d ult s. O n e m aj or s o ur c e of t hi s i n c o n si st e n c y i s i n di vi d u al diff er e n c e s a m o n g t h e p arti ci p a nt s, b ut t h e s e diff er e n c e s ar e r ar el y e x a mi n e d i n t h e c o nt e xt of c o m bi n e d tr ai ni n g/ sti m ul ati o n st u di e s. I n a d diti o n, it i s u n cl e ar h o w l o n g t h e eff e ct s of sti m ul ati o n l a st, e v e n i n s u c c e s sf ul i nt er v e nti o n s. S o m e st u di e s m a k e u s e of f oll o w- u p a s s e s s m e nt s, b ut v er y f e w h a v e m e a s ur e d p erf or m a n c e m or e t h a n a f e w m o nt hs aft er a n i nt er v e nti o n. H er e, w e utili z e d d at a fr o m a pr e vi o u s st u d y of t D C S a n d c o g niti v e tr ai ni n g [ A u, J., K at z, B., B u s c h k u e hl, M., B u n arj o, K., S e n g er, T., Z a b el, C., et al. E n h a n ci n g w or ki n g m e m or y tr ai ni n g wit h tr a n scr a ni al dir e ct c urr e nt sti m ul ati o n. J o u r n al of C o g niti v e N e u r os ci e n c e, 2 8, 1 4 1 9 – 1 4 3 2, 2 0 1 6] i n w hi c h p arti ci p a nts tr ai n e d o n a w or ki n g m e m or y t as k o v er 7 d a y s w hil e r e c ei vi n g a cti v e or s h a m t D C S. A n e w, l o n g er-t er m f oll o w- u p t o a ss es s l at er p erf or m a n c e w a s c o n d u ct e d, a n d a d diti o n al p arti ci p a nt s w er e a d d e d s o t h at t h e s h a m c o n diti o n w a s b ett er p o w er e d. W e a s s e s s e d b a s eli n e c o g niti v e a bilit y, g e n d er, tr ai ni n g sit e, a n d m oti v ati o n l e v el a n d f o u n d si g nifi c a nt i nt er a cti o ns b et w e e n b ot h b as eli n e a bilit y a n d m oti v ati o n wit h c o n diti o n ( a cti v e or s h a m) i n m o d els pr e di cti n g tr ai ni n g g ai n. I n a d diti o n, t h e i m pr o v e m e nt s i n t h e a cti v e c o nditi o n v er s u s s h a m c o n diti o n a p p e ar t o b e st a bl e e v e n a s l o n g a s a y e ar aft er t h e ori gi n al i nt er v e nti o n. ■ 

   more » « less
3. Short Proof of the Asymptotic Confirmation of the Faudree-Lehel Conjecture

   https://doi.org/10.37236/11413  

   Przybyło, Jakub; Wei, Fan (October 2023, The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics)

   Given a simple graph $$G$$, the irregularity strength of $$G$$, denoted $s(G)$, is the least positive integer $$k$$ such that there is a weight assignment on edges $$f: E(G) \to \{1,2,\dots, k\}$$ for which each vertex weight $$f^V(v):= \sum_{u: \{u,v\}\in E(G)} f(\{u,v\})$$ is unique amongst all $$v\in V(G)$$. In 1987, Faudree and Lehel conjectured that there is a constant $$c$$ such that $$s(G) \leq n/d + c$$ for all $$d$$-regular graphs $$G$$ on $$n$$ vertices with $d>1$, whereas it is trivial that $$s(G) \geq n/d$$. In this short note we prove that the Faudree-Lehel Conjecture holds when $$d \geq n^{0.8+\epsilon}$$ for any fixed $$\epsilon >0$$, with a small additive constant $c=28$ for $$n$$ large enough. Furthermore, we confirm the conjecture asymptotically by proving that for any fixed $$\beta\in(0,1/4)$$ there is a constant $$C$$ such that for all $$d$$-regular graphs $$G$$, $$s(G) \leq \frac{n}{d}(1+\frac{C}{d^{\beta}})+28$$, extending and improving a recent result of Przybyło that $$s(G) \leq \frac{n}{d}(1+ \frac{1}{\ln^{\epsilon/19}n})$$ whenever $$d\in [\ln^{1+\epsilon} n, n/\ln^{\epsilon}n]$$ and $$n$$ is large enough. 

   more » « less
4. Energy Harvesting Performance of a Flapping Foil with Leading Edge Motion

   Prier, M. (April 2019, Dissertation)

   F or c e d at a f or a fl a p pi n g f oil e n er g y h ar v e st er wit h a cti v e l e a di n g e d g e m oti o n o p er ati n g i n t h e l o w r e d u c e d fr e q u e n c y r a n g e i s c oll e ct e d t o d et er mi n e h o w l e a di n g e d g e m oti o n aff e ct s e n er g y h ar v e sti n g p erf or m a n c e. T h e f oil pi v ot s a b o ut t h e mi dc h or d a n d o p er at e s i n t h e l o w r e d u c e d fr e q u e n c y r a n g e of 𝑓𝑓 𝑓𝑓 / 𝑈𝑈 ∞ = 0. 0 6 , 0. 0 8, a n d 0. 1 0 wit h 𝑅𝑅 𝑅𝑅 = 2 0 ,0 0 0 − 3 0 ,0 0 0 , wit h a pit c hi n g a m plit u d e of 𝜃𝜃 0 = 7 0 ∘ , a n d a h e a vi n g a m plit u d e of ℎ 0 = 0. 5 𝑓𝑓 . It i s f o u n d t h at l e a di n g e d g e m oti o n s t h at r e d u c e t h e eff e cti v e a n gl e of att a c k e arl y t h e str o k e w or k t o b ot h i n cr e a s e t h e lift f or c e s a s w ell a s s hift t h e p e a k lift f or c e l at er i n t h e fl a p pi n g str o k e. L e a di n g e d g e m oti o n s i n w hi c h t h e eff e cti v e a n gl e of att a c k i s i n cr e a s e d e arl y i n t h e str o k e s h o w d e cr e a s e d p erf or m a n c e. I n a d diti o n a di s cr et e v ort e x m o d el wit h v ort e x s h e d di n g at t h e l e a di n g e d g e i s i m pl e m e nt f or t h e m oti o n s st u di e d; it i s f o u n d t h at t h e m e c h a ni s m f or s h e d di n g at t h e l e a di n g e d g e i s n ot a d e q u at e f or t hi s p ar a m et er r a n g e a n d t h e m o d el c o n si st e ntl y o v er pr e di ct s t h e a er o d y n a mi c f or c e s. 

   more » « less
5. Characterization of All Graphs with a Failed Skew Zero Forcing Number of 1

   https://doi.org/10.3390/math10234463  

   Johnson, Aidan; Vick, Andrew E.; Narayan, Darren A. (December 2022, Mathematics)

   Given a graph G, the zero forcing number of G, Z(G), is the minimum cardinality of any set S of vertices of which repeated applications of the forcing rule results in all vertices being in S. The forcing rule is: if a vertex v is in S, and exactly one neighbor u of v is not in S, then u is added to S in the next iteration. Hence the failed zero forcing number of a graph was defined to be the cardinality of the largest set of vertices which fails to force all vertices in the graph. A similar property called skew zero forcing was defined so that if there is exactly one neighbor u of v is not in S, then u is added to S in the next iteration. The difference is that vertices that are not in S can force other vertices. This leads to the failed skew zero forcing number of a graph, which is denoted by F−(G). In this paper, we provide a complete characterization of all graphs with F−(G)=1. Fetcie, Jacob, and Saavedra showed that the only graphs with a failed zero forcing number of 1 are either: the union of two isolated vertices; P3; K3; or K4. In this paper, we provide a surprising result: changing the forcing rule to a skew-forcing rule results in an infinite number of graphs with F−(G)=1. 

   more » « less