More Like this
-
Abstract Fusion to form a chimera has been documented in many marine invertebrate taxa, including poriferans, cnidarians, bryozoans, and colonial ascidians. Allogenic interactions in chimeric ascidian colonies vary widely across taxonomic groups but are poorly characterized in the invasive colonial ascidian
Didemnum vexillum. The moderate level of discrimination expressed in the fusion–rejection response ofD. vexillum suggests that there is some integration of cells beyond the fusion line in a chimeric colony. We tracked the shifts in representation of microsatellite alleles between fused colonies ofD. vexillum to elucidate the extent of genotypic integration in fused colonies and the patterns of changes to the genotypic composition of colonies immediately following chimera formation. By genotyping colonies before and after fusion, we found that allogeneic fusion inD. vexillum may lead to genotypic changes beyond the visible fusion line. Alleles from one colony were found in multiple tissue samples in the chimera 7–10 days after fusion had occurred. In some instances, alleles that were in a single colony prior to fusion were lost following fusion. We observed multiple patterns of allelic change, including both the unidirectional transfer and reciprocal exchange of alleles between fused colonies. Our findings suggest that tissue or cells are exchanged following allogeneic fusion between colonies ofD. vexillum and that the genotypic composition of chimeric colonies may be fluid. -
Abstract Premise The ~140 species of
Lonicera are characterized by variously fused leaves, bracteoles, and ovaries, making it a model system for studying the evolution and development of organ fusion. However, previous phylogenetic analyses, based mainly on chloroplast DNA markers, have yielded uncertain and conflicting results. A well‐supported phylogeny ofLonicera will allow us to trace the evolutionary history of organ fusion.Methods We inferred the phylogeny of
Lonicera using restriction site–associated DNA sequencing (RADSeq), sampling all major clades and 18 of the 23 subsections. This provided the basis for inferring the evolution of five fusion‐related traits.Results RADSeq data yielded a well‐resolved and well‐supported phylogeny. The two traditionally recognized subgenera (
Periclymenum andChamaecerasus ), three of the four sections (Isoxylosteum ,Coeloxylosteum , andNintooa ), and half of the subsections sampled were recovered as monophyletic. However, the large and heterogeneous sectionIsika was strongly supported as paraphyletic.Nintooa , a clade of ~22 mostly vine‐forming species, includingL. japonica , was recovered in a novel position, raising the possibility of cytonuclear discordance. We document the parallel evolution of fused leaves, bracteoles, and ovaries, with rare reversals. Most strikingly, complete cupules, in which four fused bracteoles completely enclose two unfused ovaries, arose at least three times. Surprisingly, these appear to have evolved directly from ancestors with free bracteoles instead of partial cupules.Conclusions We provide the most comprehensive and well‐supported phylogeny of
Lonicera to date. Our inference of multiple evolutionary shifts in organ fusion provides a solid foundation for in depth developmental and functional analyses.