skip to main content


Title: i Fusion: Individualized Fusion Learning
Award ID(s):
1737857 1812048
NSF-PAR ID:
10166549
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of the American Statistical Association
ISSN:
0162-1459
Page Range / eLocation ID:
1 to 17
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. null (Ed.)
  2. Abstract

    Fusion to form a chimera has been documented in many marine invertebrate taxa, including poriferans, cnidarians, bryozoans, and colonial ascidians. Allogenic interactions in chimeric ascidian colonies vary widely across taxonomic groups but are poorly characterized in the invasive colonial ascidianDidemnum vexillum.The moderate level of discrimination expressed in the fusion–rejection response ofD. vexillumsuggests that there is some integration of cells beyond the fusion line in a chimeric colony. We tracked the shifts in representation of microsatellite alleles between fused colonies ofD. vexillumto elucidate the extent of genotypic integration in fused colonies and the patterns of changes to the genotypic composition of colonies immediately following chimera formation. By genotyping colonies before and after fusion, we found that allogeneic fusion inD. vexillummay lead to genotypic changes beyond the visible fusion line. Alleles from one colony were found in multiple tissue samples in the chimera 7–10 days after fusion had occurred. In some instances, alleles that were in a single colony prior to fusion were lost following fusion. We observed multiple patterns of allelic change, including both the unidirectional transfer and reciprocal exchange of alleles between fused colonies. Our findings suggest that tissue or cells are exchanged following allogeneic fusion between colonies ofD. vexillumand that the genotypic composition of chimeric colonies may be fluid.

     
    more » « less
  3. Abstract Premise

    The ~140 species ofLoniceraare characterized by variously fused leaves, bracteoles, and ovaries, making it a model system for studying the evolution and development of organ fusion. However, previous phylogenetic analyses, based mainly on chloroplast DNA markers, have yielded uncertain and conflicting results. A well‐supported phylogeny ofLonicerawill allow us to trace the evolutionary history of organ fusion.

    Methods

    We inferred the phylogeny ofLonicerausing restriction site–associated DNA sequencing (RADSeq), sampling all major clades and 18 of the 23 subsections. This provided the basis for inferring the evolution of five fusion‐related traits.

    Results

    RADSeq data yielded a well‐resolved and well‐supported phylogeny. The two traditionally recognized subgenera (PericlymenumandChamaecerasus), three of the four sections (Isoxylosteum,Coeloxylosteum, andNintooa), and half of the subsections sampled were recovered as monophyletic. However, the large and heterogeneous sectionIsikawas strongly supported as paraphyletic.Nintooa, a clade of ~22 mostly vine‐forming species, includingL. japonica, was recovered in a novel position, raising the possibility of cytonuclear discordance. We document the parallel evolution of fused leaves, bracteoles, and ovaries, with rare reversals. Most strikingly, complete cupules, in which four fused bracteoles completely enclose two unfused ovaries, arose at least three times. Surprisingly, these appear to have evolved directly from ancestors with free bracteoles instead of partial cupules.

    Conclusions

    We provide the most comprehensive and well‐supported phylogeny ofLonicerato date. Our inference of multiple evolutionary shifts in organ fusion provides a solid foundation for in depth developmental and functional analyses.

     
    more » « less