More Like this

1. Hard-photon-triggered jets in $p\text{−}p$ and $A\text{−}A$ collisions

   https://doi.org/10.1103/yyr5-zp16  

   Sirimanna, C; Tachibana, Y; Majumder, A; Angerami, A; Arora, R; Bass, S A; Chen, Y; Datta, R; Du, L; Ehlers, R; et al (June 2025, Physical Review C)

   An investigation of high-transverse-momentum (high- $p_T$) photon-triggered jets in proton-proton ( $p\text{−}p$) and ion-ion ( $A\text{−}A$) collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=0.2$and $5.02\mathrm{TeV}$is carried out, using the multistage description of in-medium jet evolution. Monte Carlo simulations of hard scattering and energy loss in heavy-ion collisions are performed using parameters tuned in a previous study of the nuclear modification factor ( $R_{AA}$) for inclusive jets and high- $p_T$hadrons. We obtain a good reproduction of the experimental data for photon-triggered jet $R_{AA}$, as measured by the ATLAS detector, the distribution of the ratio of jet to photon $p_T$( $X_{J\gamma }$), measured by both CMS and ATLAS, and the photon-jet azimuthal correlation as measured by CMS. We obtain a moderate description of the photon-triggered jet $I_{AA}$, as measured by STAR. A noticeable improvement in the comparison is observed when one goes beyond prompt photons and includes bremsstrahlung and decay photons, revealing their significance in certain kinematic regions, particularly at $X_{J\gamma }>1$. Moreover, azimuthal angle correlations demonstrate a notable impact of bremsstrahlung photons on the distribution, emphasizing their role in accurately describing experimental results. This work highlights the success of the multistage model of jet modification to straightforwardly predict (this set of) photon-triggered jet observables. This comparison, along with the role played by bremsstrahlung photons, has important consequences on the inclusion of such observables in a future Bayesian analysis. Published by the American Physical Society2025 

   more » « less
2. Imaging Optical Frequencies with $100\mu \mathrm{Hz}$ Precision and $1.1\mu \mathrm{m}$ Resolution

   https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.103201  

   Marti, G. Edward; Hutson, Ross B.; Goban, Akihisa; Campbell, Sara L.; Poli, Nicola; Ye, Jun (March 2018, Physical Review Letters)
3. Measurement of the Prompt $D^0$ Nuclear Modification Factor in $p\text{−}\mathrm{Pb}$ Collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=8.16\mathrm{TeV}$

   https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.102301  

   Aaij, R.; Abdelmotteleb, A. S. W.; Abellan Beteta, C.; Abudinén, F.; Ackernley, T.; Adeva, B.; Adinolfi, M.; Afsharnia, H.; Agapopoulou, C.; Aidala, C. A.; et al (September 2023, Physical Review Letters)
4. Sign structure of the $t\text{−}t{}^{\prime }\text{−}J$ model and its physical consequences

   https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.165127  

   Lu, Xin; Zhang, Jia-Xin; Gong, Shou-Shu; Sheng, D_N; Weng, Zheng-Yu (October 2024, Physical Review B)
5. Hypertriton Production in $p$ -Pb Collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02\mathrm{TeV}$

   https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.252003  

   Acharya, S.; Adamová, D.; Adler, A.; Aglieri Rinella, G.; Agnello, M.; Agrawal, N.; Ahammed, Z.; Ahmad, S.; Ahn, S. U.; Ahuja, I.; et al (June 2022, Physical Review Letters)