More Like this

1. The Need for Student Engagement: The Need for Student Engagement

   https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20288  

   Hamilton, Andrew (June 2018, New Directions for Teaching and Learning)
2. The BEST framework for the search for the QCD critical point and the chiral magnetic effect

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2021.122343  

   An, Xin; Bluhm, Marcus; Du, Lipei; Dunne, Gerald V.; Elfner, Hannah; Gale, Charles; Grefa, Joaquin; Heinz, Ulrich; Huang, Anping; Karthein, Jamie M.; et al (January 2022, Nuclear Physics A)
3. The search for the most conductive metal for narrow interconnect lines

   https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5133671  

   Gall, Daniel (February 2020, Journal of Applied Physics)
4. The Case for Improving the Robinson Formulas

   https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028332  

   Liemohn, Michael W. (October 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics)

   null (Ed.)
5. Counterfactuals for the Future

   https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v37i12.26655  

   Bynum, Lucius E.; Loftus, Joshua R.; Stoyanovich, Julia (June 2023, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence)

   Counterfactuals are often described as 'retrospective,' focusing on hypothetical alternatives to a realized past. This description relates to an often implicit assumption about the structure and stability of exogenous variables in the system being modeled --- an assumption that is reasonable in many settings where counterfactuals are used. In this work, we consider cases where we might reasonably make a different assumption about exogenous variables; namely, that the exogenous noise terms of each unit do exhibit some unit-specific structure and/or stability. This leads us to a different use of counterfactuals --- a forward-looking rather than retrospective counterfactual. We introduce "counterfactual treatment choice," a type of treatment choice problem that motivates using forward-looking counterfactuals. We then explore how mismatches between interventional versus forward-looking counterfactual approaches to treatment choice, consistent with different assumptions about exogenous noise, can lead to counterintuitive results. 

   more » « less