Abstract. Simulations of the Indian summer monsoon by the cloud-permitting Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model at gray-zone resolution are described in this study, with a particular emphasis on the model ability to capture the monsoon intraseasonal oscillations (MISOs). Five boreal summers are simulated from 2007 to 2011 using the ERA-Interim reanalysis as the lateral boundary forcing data. Our experimental setup relies on a horizontal grid spacing of 9km to explicitly simulate deep convection without the use of cumulus parameterizations. When compared to simulations with coarser grid spacing (27km) and using a cumulus scheme, the 9km simulations reduce the biases in mean precipitation and produce more realistic low-frequency variability associated with MISOs. Results show that the model at the 9km gray-zone resolution captures the salient features of the summer monsoon. The spatial distributions and temporal evolutions of monsoon rainfall in the WRF simulations verify qualitatively well against observations from the Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission (TRMM), with regional maxima located over Western Ghats, central India, Himalaya foothills, and the west coast of Myanmar. The onset, breaks, and withdrawal of the summer monsoon in each year are also realistically captured by the model. The MISO-phase composites of monsoon rainfall, low-level wind, and precipitable water anomalies in the simulations also agree qualitatively with the observations. Both the simulations and observations show a northeastward propagation of the MISOs, with the intensification and weakening of the Somali Jet over the Arabian Sea during the active and break phases of the Indian summer monsoon.
- Award ID(s):
- 1648629
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10175877
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Climate
- Volume:
- 32
- Issue:
- 23
- ISSN:
- 0894-8755
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 8355 to 8372
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
-
Improved Performance of High‐Resolution Climate Models in Simulating Asian Monsoon Rainfall Extremesmore » « less
Abstract Rainfall extremes are one of the most difficult features to simulate using global climate models. Using pairs of high‐ and low‐resolution atmosphere‐only simulations from the High‐Resolution Model Intercomparison Project, we assess whether and how the horizontal grid spacing influences model's skill in simulating the Asian summer monsoon rainfall extremes. Despite the large inter‐model spread, improved model performance is seen across most models as resolution increases, both in terms of spatial distribution and intensity of monsoon rainfall extremes. Rainfall extremes are enhanced at the windward side of steep topography such as the foothills of Himalayas, and in the heavy monsoon regions such as central India, southern China, and western North Pacific. The improvements are found to be associated with a better representation of the vertical ascents and models' ability in simulating the rain‐producing synoptic low‐pressure systems, which are more frequent and stronger at higher resolutions.
-
more » « less
Abstract Characteristics of tropical cyclones (TCs) in global climate models (GCMs) are known to be influenced by details of the model configurations, including horizontal resolution and parameterization schemes. Understanding model-to-model differences in TC characteristics is a prerequisite for reducing uncertainty in future TC activity projections by GCMs. This study performs a process-level examination of TC structures in eight GCM simulations that span a range of horizontal resolutions from 1° to 0.25°. A recently developed set of process-oriented diagnostics is used to examine the azimuthally averaged wind and thermodynamic structures of the GCM-simulated TCs. Results indicate that the inner-core wind structures of simulated TCs are more strongly constrained by the horizontal resolutions of the models than are the thermodynamic structures of those TCs. As expected, the structures of TC circulations become more realistic with smaller horizontal grid spacing, such that the radii of maximum wind (RMW) become smaller, and the maximum vertical velocities occur off the center. However, the RMWs are still too large, especially at higher intensities, and there are rising motions occurring at the storm centers, inconsistently with observations. The distributions of precipitation, moisture, and radiative and surface turbulent heat fluxes around TCs are diverse, even across models with similar horizontal resolutions. At the same horizontal resolution, models that produce greater rainfall in the inner-core regions tend to simulate stronger TCs. When TCs are weak, the radial gradient of net column radiative flux convergence is comparable to that of surface turbulent heat fluxes, emphasizing the importance of cloud–radiative feedbacks during the early developmental phases of TCs.
-
more » « less
Abstract A midlatitude channel model (MCM), zonally global but meridionally bounded, is constructed for the Northern Hemisphere (0°–360°, 26°N–60°N), based on the Weather Research and Forecasting model. The MCM simulates the midlatitude at a higher resolution than typically possible in a global climate model (GCM). On the other hand, compared to four lateral boundaries in a standard regional or limited‐area model, MCM is bounded on two meridional sides only allowing the simulated atmosphere to develop more freely. Based on a 4‐year simulation at ∼0.33° horizontal grid‐spacing, the MCM realistically captures the annual mean and seasonal cycle of the midlatitude atmosphere and the meridional heat transport by the stationary and transient eddies that dominate the winter weather. Moreover, a comparison of MCM with the ensemble mean of 20 contemporary atmospheric GCMs reveals that the MCM performs better than the GCM ensemble mean. Possible applications of this new modeling configuration are discussed.
-
more » « less
Abstract Precipitation amount (A), frequency (F), intensity (I), and duration (D) are important properties of precipitation, but their estimates are sensitive to data resolution. This study investigates this resolution dependence, and the influences of different model physics, by analyzing simulations by the Community Atmospheric Model (CAM) version 4 (CAM4) and version 5 (CAM5) with varying grid sizes from ~0.25 to 2.0°. Results show that both CAM4 and CAM5 greatly overestimate F and D but underestimate I at all resolutions, despite realistic A. These biases partly result from too much parameterized (convective) precipitation with high F and D but low I. Different cloud microphysics schemes contribute to the precipitation differences between CAM4 and CAM5. The A, F, I, and D of convective and nonconvective precipitation react differently to grid‐size decreases, leading to the large decreases in F and D but increases in the I for total precipitation as model resolution increases. This resolution dependence results from the increased probability of precipitation over a larger area (area aggregation effect, which is smaller than in observations) and the varying performance of model physics under changing resolution (model adjustment effect), which roughly enhances the aggregation‐induced dependence. Finer grid sizes not only increase resolved precipitation, which has higher intensity and thus improves overall precipitation intensity in CAM, but also reduce the area aggregation effect. Thus, the long‐standing
drizzling problem in climate models may be mitigated by increasing model resolution and modifying model physics to suppress parameterized convective precipitation and enhance resolved nonconvective precipitation.
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0567.1
