skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Semi-Fast Byzantine-tolerant Shared Register without Reliable Broadcast
Shared register emulations on top of message- passing systems provide an illusion of a simpler shared memory system which can make the task of a system designer easier. Numerous shared register applications have a considerably high read to write ratio. Thus having algorithms that make reads more efficient than writes is a fair trade-off. Typically such algorithms for reads and writes are asymmetric and sacrifice the stringent consistency condition atomicity as it is impossible to have fast reads for multi-writer atomicity. Safety is a consistency condition has has gathered interest from both the systems and theory community as it is weaker than atomicity yet provides strong enough guarantees like “strong consistency” or read-my-write consistency. One requirement that is assumed by many researchers is that of the reliable broadcast (RB) primitive, which ensures the all or none property during a broadcast. One drawback is that such a primitive takes 1.5 rounds to complete. This paper implements an efficient multi-writer multi-reader safe register without using a reliable broadcast primitive. More- over, we provide fast reads or one-shot reads – our read operation can be completed in one round of client-to-server communication. Of course, this comes with the price of requiring more servers when compared to prior solutions assuming reliable broadcast. However, we show that this increased number of servers is indeed necessary as we prove a tight bound on the number of servers required to implement Byzantine-fault tolerant safe registers in a system without reliable broadcast. We extend our results to data stored using erasure coding as well. We present an emulation of single-writer multi-reader safe register based on MDS code. The usage of MDS code reduces storage cost and communication cost. On the negative side, we also show that to use MDS code and achieve one-shot read at the same time, we need even more servers.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1816487
PAR ID:
10176146
Author(s) / Creator(s):
Date Published:
Journal Name:
40th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; (, 35th IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS))
    null (Ed.)
    Abstract—READ transactions that read data distributed across servers dominate the workloads of real-world distributed storage systems. The SNOW Theorem [13] stated that ideal READ transactions that have optimal latency and the strongest guarantees—i.e., “SNOW” READ transactions—are impossible in one specific setting that requires three or more clients: at least two readers and one writer. However, it left many open questions.We close all of these open questions with new impossibility results and new algorithms. First, we prove rigorously the result from [13] saying that it is impossible to have a READ transactions system that satisfies SNOW properties with three or more clients.The insight we gained from this proof led to teasing out the implicit assumptions that are required to state the results and also, resolving the open question regarding the possibility of SNOW with two clients. We show that it is possible to design an algorithm, where SNOW is possible in a multi-writer, single-reader (MWSR) setting when a client can send messages to other clients; on the other hand, we prove it is impossible to implement SNOW in a multi-writer, single-reader (MWSR) setting–which is more general than the two-client setting–when client-to-client communication is disallowed. We also correct the previous claim in [13] that incorrectly identified one existing system, Eiger [12], as supporting the strongest guarantees (SW)and whose read-only transactions had bounded latency. Thus,there were no previous algorithms that provided the strongest guarantees and had bounded latency. Finally, we introduce the first two algorithms to provide the strongest guarantees with bounded latency 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; ; (, 28th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures (SPAA))
    Motivated by the significantly higher cost of writing than reading in emerging memory technologies, we consider parallel algorithm design under such asymmetric read-write costs, with the goal of reducing the number of writes while preserving work-efficiency and low span. We present a nested-parallel model of computation that combines (i) small per-task stack-allocated memories with symmetric read-write costs and (ii) an unbounded heap-allocated shared memory with asymmetric read-write costs, and show how the costs in the model map efficiently onto a more concrete machine model under a work-stealing scheduler. We use the new model to design reduced write, work-efficient, low span parallel algorithms for a number of fundamental problems such as reduce, list contraction, tree contraction, breadth-first search, ordered filter, and planar convex hull. For the latter two problems, our algorithms are output-sensitive in that the work and number of writes decrease with the output size. We also present a reduced write, low span minimum spanning tree algorithm that is nearly work-efficient (off by the inverse Ackermann function). Our algorithms reveal several interesting techniques for significantly reducing shared memory writes in parallel algorithms without asymptotically increasing the number of shared memory reads. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, OSDI 2018)
    The FuzzyLog is a partially ordered shared log abstraction. Distributed applications can concurrently append to the partial order and play it back. FuzzyLog applications obtain the benefits of an underlying shared log --- extracting strong consistency, durability, and failure atomicity in simple ways --- without suffering from its drawbacks. By exposing a partial order, the FuzzyLog enables three key capabilities for applications: linear scaling for throughput and capacity (without sacrificing atomicity), weaker consistency guarantees, and tolerance to network partitions. We present Dapple, a distributed implementation of the FuzzyLog abstraction that stores the partial order compactly and supports efficient appends / playback via a new ordering protocol. We implement several data structures and applications over the FuzzyLog, including several map variants as well as a ZooKeeper implementation. Our evaluation shows that these applications are compact, fast, and flexible: they retain the simplicity (100s of lines of code) and strong semantics (durability and failure atomicity) of a shared log design while exploiting the partial order of the FuzzyLog for linear scalability, flexible consistency guarantees (e.g., causal+ consistency), and network partition tolerance. On a 6-node Dapple deployment, our FuzzyLogbased ZooKeeper supports 3M/sec single-key writes, and 150K/sec atomic cross-shard renames. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Proceedings of the 12th USENIX Conference on Operating Systems Design and Implementation)
    The FuzzyLog is a partially ordered shared log abstraction. Distributed applications can concurrently append to the partial order and play it back. FuzzyLog applications obtain the benefits of an underlying shared log - extracting strong consistency, durability, and failure atomicity in simple ways - without suffering from its drawbacks. By exposing a partial order, the FuzzyLog enables three key capabilities for applications: linear scaling for throughput and capacity (without sacrificing atomicity), weaker consistency guarantees, and tolerance to network partitions. We present Dapple, a distributed implementation of the FuzzyLog abstraction that stores the partial order compactly and supports efficient appends / playback via a new ordering protocol. We implement several data structures and applications over the FuzzyLog, including several map variants as well as a ZooKeeper implementation. Our evaluation shows that these applications are compact, fast, and flexible: they retain the simplicity (100s of lines of code) and strong semantics (durability and failure atomicity) of a shared log design while exploiting the partial order of the FuzzyLog for linear scalability, flexible consistency guarantees (e.g., causal+ consistency), and network partition tolerance. On a 6-node Dapple deployment, our FuzzyLog-based ZooKeeper supports 3M/sec single-key writes, and 150K/sec atomic cross-shard renames. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; (, ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures (SPAA))
    In this paper, we design parallel write-efficient geometric algorithms that perform asymptotically fewer writes than standard algorithms for the same problem. This is motivated by emerging non-volatile memory technologies with read performance being close to that of random access memory but writes being significantly more expensive in terms of energy and latency. We design algorithms for planar Delaunay triangulation, k-d trees, and static and dynamic augmented trees. Our algorithms are designed in the recently introduced Asymmetric Nested-Parallel Model, which captures the parallel setting in which there is a small symmetric memory where reads and writes are unit cost as well as a large asymmetric memory where writes are ω times more expensive than reads. In designing these algorithms, we introduce several techniques for obtaining write-efficiency, including DAG tracing, prefix doubling, and α-labeling, which we believe will be useful for designing other parallel write-efficient algorithms. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email