null
(Ed.)
Abstract. Canopy stomatal conductance is commonly estimated fromeddy covariance measurements of the latent heat flux (LE) by inverting thePenman–Monteith equation. That method ignores eddy covariance measurementsof the sensible heat flux (H) and instead calculates H implicitly as theresidual of all other terms in the site energy budget. Here we show thatcanopy stomatal conductance is more accurately calculated from eddy covariance (EC)measurements of both H and LE using the flux–gradient equations that defineconductance and underlie the Penman–Monteith equation, especially when thesite energy budget fails to close due to pervasive biases in the eddy fluxesand/or the available energy. The flux–gradient formulation dispenses withunnecessary assumptions, is conceptually simpler, and is as or more accuratein all plausible scenarios. The inverted Penman–Monteith equation, on theother hand, contributes substantial biases and erroneous spatial andtemporal patterns to canopy stomatal conductance, skewing its relationshipswith drivers such as light and vapor pressure deficit.
more »
« less
An official website of the United States government

