An official website of the United States government
Abstract How convective boundary‐layer (CBL) processes modify fluxes of sensible (SH) and latent (LH) heat and CO2(Fc) in the atmospheric surface layer (ASL) remains a recalcitrant problem. Here, large eddy simulations for the CBL show that whileSHin the ASL decreases linearly with height regardless of soil moisture conditions,LHandFcdecrease linearly with height over wet soils but increase with height over dry soils. This varying flux divergence/convergence is regulated by changes in asymmetric flux transport between top‐down and bottom‐up processes. Such flux divergence and convergence indicate that turbulent fluxes measured in the ASL underestimate and overestimate the “true” surface interfacial fluxes, respectively. While the non‐closure of the surface energy balance persists across all soil moisture states, it improves over drier soils due to overestimatedLH. The non‐closure does not imply thatFcis always underestimated;Fccan be overestimated over dry soils despite the non‐closure issue.
more »
« less
Is There a Scalar Atmospheric Surface Layer Within a Convective Boundary Layer? Implications for Flux Measurements
Abstract Top‐down entrainment shapes the vertical gradients of sensible heat, latent heat, and CO2fluxes, influencing the interpretation of eddy covariance (EC) measurements in the unstable atmospheric surface layer (ASL). Using large eddy simulations for convective boundary layer flows, we demonstrate that decreased temperature gradients across the entrainment zone increase entrainment fluxes by enhancing the entrainment velocity, amplifying the asymmetry between top‐down and bottom‐up flux contributions. These changes alter scalar flux profiles, causing flux divergence or convergence and leading to the breakdown of the constant flux layer assumption (CFLA) in the ASL. As a result, EC‐measured fluxes either underestimate or overestimate “true” surface fluxes during divergence or convergence phases, contributing to energy balance non‐closure. The varying degrees of the CFLA breakdown are a fundamental cause for the non‐closure issue. These findings highlight the underappreciated role of entrainment in interpreting EC fluxes, addressing non‐closure, and understanding site‐to‐site variability in flux measurements.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10576685
- Publisher / Repository:
- DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Volume:
- 52
- Issue:
- 5
- ISSN:
- 0094-8276
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Single point eddy covariance measurements of the Earth’s surface energy budget frequently identify an imbalance between available energy and turbulent heat fluxes. While this imbalance lacks a definitive explanation, it is nevertheless a persistent finding from single-site measurements; one with implications for atmospheric and ecosystem models. This has led to a push for intensive field campaigns with temporally and spatially distributed sensors to help identify the causes of energy balance non-closure. Here we present results from the Chequamegon Heterogeneous Ecosystem Energy-balance Study Enabled by a High-density Extensive Array of Detectors 2019 (CHEESEHEAD19)—an observational experiment designed to investigate how the Earth’s surface energy budget responds to scales of surface spatial heterogeneity over a forest ecosystem in northern Wisconsin. The campaign was conducted from June–October 2019, measuring eddy covariance (EC) surface energy fluxes using an array of 20 towers and a low-flying aircraft. Across the domain, energy balance residuals were found to be highest during the afternoon, coinciding with the period of surface heterogeneity-driven mesoscale motions. The magnitude of the residual varied across different sites in relation to the vegetation characteristics of each site. Both vegetation height and height variability showed positive relationships with the residual magnitude. During the seasonal transition from latent heat-dominated summer to sensible heat-dominated fall the magnitude of the energy balance residual steadily decreased, but the energy balance ratio remained constant at 0.8. This was due to the different components of the energy balance equation shifting proportionally, suggesting a common cause of non-closure across the two seasons. Additionally, we tested the effectiveness of measuring energy balance using spatial EC. Spatial EC, whereby the covariance is calculated based on deviations from spatial means, has been proposed as a potential way to reduce energy balance residuals by incorporating contributions from mesoscale motions better than single-site, temporal EC. Here we tested several variations of spatial EC with the CHEESEHEAD19 dataset but found little to no improvement to energy balance closure, which we attribute in part to the challenging measurement requirements of spatial EC.more » « less
-
Abstract How large turbulent eddies influence non‐closure of the surface energy balance is an active research topic that cannot be uncovered by the mean continuity equation in isolation. It is demonstrated here that asymmetric turbulent flux transport of heat and water vapor by sweeps and ejections of large eddies under unstable atmospheric stability conditions reduce fluxes. Such asymmetry causes positive gradients in the third‐order moments in the turbulent flux budget equations, primarily attributed to substantially reduced flux contributions by sweeps and sustained large flux contributions by ejections. Small‐scale surface heterogeneity in heating generates ejecting eddies with larger air temperature variance than sweeping eddies, causing asymmetric flux transport in the atmospheric surface layer. Changes in asymmetry with increasing instability are congruent with observed increases in the surface energy balance non‐closure. To assess the contributions of asymmetric flux transport by large eddies to the non‐closure requires two eddy covariance systems on the tower to measure the gradients of the turbulent heat flux and other third‐order moments.more » « less
-
Canopy stomatal conductance (gsV) is commonly estimated from eddy covariance (EC) measurements of latent heat flux (LE) by inverting the Penman-Monteith (PM) equation. That method implicitly represents the sensible heat flux (H) as the residual of all other terms in the site energy budget – even though H is measured at least as accurately as LE at every EC site while the rest of the energy budget almost never is. We argue that gsV should instead be calculated from EC measurements of both H and LE, using the flux-gradient formulation that defines conductance and underlies the PM equation. The flux-gradient formulation dispenses with unnecessary assumptions, is conceptually simpler, and provides more accurate values of gsV for all plausible scenarios in which the measured energy budget fails to close, as is common at EC sites. The PM equation, on the other hand, contributes biases and erroneous spatial and temporal patterns to gsV, skewing its relationships with drivers such as light and vapor pressure deficit. To minimize the impact of the energy budget closure problem on the PM equation, it was previously proposed that the eddy fluxes should be corrected to close the long-term energy budget while preserving the Bowen ratio (B = H/LE). We show that such a flux correction does not fully remedy the PM equation but should produce accurate values of gsV when combined with the flux-gradient formulation.more » « less
-
Large-eddy simulations (LES) above forests and cities typically constrain the simulation domain to the first 10--20\% of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer (ABL), aiming to represent the finer details of the roughness elements and sublayer. These simulations are also commonly driven by a constant pressure gradient term in the streamwise direction and zero stress at the top, resulting in an unrealistic fast decay of the total stress profile. In this study, we investigate five LES setups, including pressure and/or top-shear driven flows with and without the Coriolis force, with the aim of identifying which option best represents turbulence profiles in the atmospheric surface layer (ASL). We show that flows driven solely by pressure not only result in a fast-decaying stress profile, but also in lower velocity variances and higher velocity skewnesses. Top-shear driven flows, on the other hand, better replicate ASL statistics. Overall, we recommend, and provide setup guidance for, simulation designs that include both a large scale pressure forcing and a non-zero stress and scalar flux at the top of the domain, and that also represent the Coriolis force. Such setups retain all the forces used in typical full ABL cases and result in the best match of the profiles of various statistical moments.more » « less
