skip to main content

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Can AFM be used to measure absolute values of Young's modulus of nanocomposite materials down to the nanoscale?
At present, a technique potentially capable of measuring values of Young's modulus at the nanoscale is atomic force microscopy (AFM) working in the indentation mode. However, the question if AFM indentation data can be translated into absolute values of the modulus is not well-studied as yet, in particular, for the most interesting case of stiff nanocomposite materials. Here we investigate this question. A special sample of nanocomposite material, shale rock, was used, which is relatively homogeneous at the multi-micron scale. Two AFM modes, force-volume and PeakForce QNM were used in this study. The nanoindentation technique was used as a control benchmark for the measurement of effective Young's modulus of the shale sample. The indentation rate was carefully controlled. To ensure the self-consistency of the mechanical model used to analyze AFM data, the model was modified to take into account the presence of the surface roughness. We found excellent agreement between the average values of effective Young's modulus calculated within AFM and the nanoindenter benchmark method. At the same time, the softest and hardest areas of the sample were seen only with AFM.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1937373 1428919 1435655
PAR ID:
10177054
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Nanoscale
Volume:
12
Issue:
23
ISSN:
2040-3364
Page Range / eLocation ID:
12432 to 12443
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ( , Nanoscale)
    The brush model was introduced to interpret AFM indentation data collected on biological cells in a more consistent way compared just to the traditional Hertz model. It takes into account the presence of non-Hertzian deformation of the pericellular brush-like layer surrounding cells (a mix of glycocalyx molecules and microvilli/microridges). The model allows finding the effective Young's modulus of the cell body in a less depth-dependent manner. In addition, it allows finding the force due to the pericellular brush layer. Compared to simple mechanical models used to interpret the indentation experiments, the brush model has additional complexity. It raises the concern about the possible unambiguity of separation of mechanical properties of the cell body and pericellular layer. Here we present the analysis of the robustness of the brush model and demonstrate a weak dependence of the obtained results on the uncertainties within the model and experimental data. We critically analyzed the use of the brush model on a variety of AFM force curves collected on rather distinct cell types: human cervical epithelial cells, rat neurons, and zebrafish melanocytes. We conclude that the brush model is robust; the errors in the definition of the effective Young's modulus due to possible uncertainties of the model and experimental data are within 4%, which is less than the error, for example, due to a typical uncertainty in the spring constant of the AFM cantilever. We also discuss the errors of parameterization of the force due to the pericellular brush layer. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ( , Small)
    Abstract

    In this work, the influence of the rigid substrate on the determination of the sample Young's modulus, the so‐calledbottom‐effect artifact, is demonstrated by an atomic force microscopy force‐spectroscopy experiment. The nanomechanical properties of a one‐component supported lipid membrane (SLM) exhibiting areas of two different thicknesses are studied: While a standard contact mechanics model (Sneddon) provides two different elastic moduli for these two morphologies, it is shown that Garcia's bottom‐effect artifact correction yields a unique value, as expected for an intrinsic material property. Remarkably, it is demonstrated that the ratio between the contact radius (and not only the indentation) and the sample thickness is the key parameter addressing the relevance of the bottom‐effect artifact. The experimental results are validated by finite element method simulations providing a solid support to Garcia's theory. The amphiphilic nature of the investigated material is representative of several kinds of lipids, suggesting that the results have far reaching implications for determining thecorrectYoung's modulus of SLMs. The generality of Garcia's bottom‐effect artifact correction allows its application to every kind of supported soft film.

     
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ( , Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials)
    Mechanical properties are essential for the biological activities of cells, and they have been shown to be affected by diseases. Therefore, accurate mechanical characterization is important for studying the cell lifecycle, cell-cell interactions, and disease diagnosis. While the cytoskeleton and actin cortex are typically the primary structural stiffness contributors in most live cells, oocytes possess an additional extracellular layer known as the vitelline membrane (VM), or envelope, which can significantly impact their overall mechanical properties. In this study, we utilized nanoindentation via an atomic force microscope to measure the Young's modulus of Xenopus laevis oocytes at different force setpoints and explored the influence of the VM by conducting measurements on oocytes with the membrane removed. The findings revealed that the removal of VM led to a significant decrease in the apparent Young's modulus of the oocytes, highlighting the pivotal role of the VM as the main structural component responsible for the oocyte's shape and stiffness. Furthermore, the mechanical behavior of VM was investigated through finite element (FE) simulations of the nanoindentation process. FE simulations with the VM Young's modulus in the range 20–60 MPa resulted in force-displacement curves that closely resemble experimental in terms of shape and maximum force for a given indentation depth. 
    more » « less
  4. ( , Materials & design)
    Characterization of the interphase region in carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) is challenging because of the length scale involved. The interpretation of measured load-displacement curves using indentation is affected by the lack of analytical solutions that account for the fiber constraint effect. A combination of AFM (Atomic Force Microscopy) based indentation and FE (Finite Element) simulations showed a gradient in the elastic modulus of the interphase evaluated along a radial line from the fiber. 3D FEA (Finite Element Analysis) indicated that fiber constraint effect is significant in the region less than 40 nm away from the fiber. Nonetheless, the apparent rise in elastic modulus due to fiber constraint is limited when compared to the gradient in the elastic modulus of the interphase. Additionally, this technique is used to demonstrate that UV irradiation causes a rapid decrease in the modulus of the region near the fiber due to photocatalytic degradation of carbon fiber but subsequently increases due to high cross-linking. Whereas, the modulus of the matrix at 8 mm away from the fiber decreased by 32% after 24 h of UV irradiation. This indicates that the response of epoxy to UV irradiation is influenced by the proximity to the reinforcement. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ( , Harvard Dataverse)
    Raw data of scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), force spectroscopy, data analysis and plotting, optical microscopy, and finite element simulations (FEA) for our manuscript. File Formats AFM raw data is provided in Gwyddion format, which can be viewed using the Gwyddion AFM viewer, which has been released under the GNU public software licence GPLv3 and can be downloaded free of charge at http://gwyddion.net/ Optical microscopy data is provided in JPEG format SEM raw data is provided in TIFF format Data analysis codes were written in MATLAB (https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab) and stored as *.m files Imported raw data to MATLAB and saved MATLAB data were stored as MATLAB multidimensional arrays (MATLAB “struct” data format, *.mat files) FEA results were saved as text files, .txt files) Data (Folder Structure) The data in the dataverse is best viewed in Tree mode. Read me file.docx More Explanations of analysis in docx format. Figure 1 Figure 1 - panel b.jpg (5.5 MB) Optical micrograph (JPEG format) Figure 1 - panel c - AFM Raw Data.gwy (8.0 MB) AFM raw data (Gwyddion format) Figure 1 - panel e - P0_Force-curve_raw_data.txt (3 KB) Raw force-displacement data at P0 (text format) Figure 1 - panel e - Px_Force-curve_raw_data.txt (3 KB) Raw force-displacement data at Px (text format) Figure 1 - panel e - Py_Force-curve_raw_data.txt (3 KB) Raw force-displacement data at Py (text format) Figure 1 - panel e - P0_simulation_raw_data.txt (12 KB) FEA simulated force-distance data at P0 (text format) Figure 1 - panel e - Px_simulation_raw_data.txt (12 KB) FEA simulated force-distance data at Px (text format) Figure 1 - panel e - Py_simulation_raw_data.txt (12 KB) FEA simulated force-distance data at Py (text format) Figure 1 - panel e - FCfindc.m (2 KB) MATLAB code to calculate inverse optical lever sensitivity (InverseOLS) of AFM cantelever (matlab .m format) Figure 1 - panel e - FreqFindANoise_new.m (2 KB) MATLAB code to calculate white noise constant, A (Explained in the Read me file) (matlab .m format) Figure 1 - panel e - FreqFindQ_new.m (4 KB) MATLAB code to calculate Q factor of the AFM cantelever (matlab .m format) Figure 1 - panel e - FCkeff.m (2 KB) MATLAB code to calculate the effective spring constant k of the AFM cantelever (matlab .m format) Figure 1 - panel e - FCimport.m (7 KB) MATLAB code to import raw force-displacement data into MATLAB (matlab .m format) Figure 1 - panel e - FCForceDist.m (2 KB) MATLAB code to convert raw force-displacement data into force-distance data (matlab .m format) Figure 1 - panel e - Figure 1- Panel e - data.mat (6 KB) MATALB struct data file for calibrated force-distance data at all indentation points (matlab .mat format) Figure 1 - panel e - Panel_e_MatlabCode.m (6 KB) MATALB code for plotting experimental and simulated force curves in panel e (matlab .m format) Figure 1 - panel e - Read me file - force curve calibration.docx (14 KB) Explains force curve calibration (.docx format) Figure 1 - panel e - Read me file - lever spring constant calibration.docx (14 KB) Explains AFM lever spring constant calibration (.docx format) Figure 2 Figure 2 - panel a - MATLAB data.mat (2.6 KB) MATALB data file for simulated data (matlab .mat format) Figure 2 - panel b - MATLAB data.mat (2.4 KB) MATALB data file for simulated data (matlab .mat format) Figure 2 - panel a - simulation raw data.txt (5.0 KB) Raw simulation data: xyz coordinates of the nodes of deformed FEA mesh (text format) Figure 2 - panel b - simulation raw data.txt (5.0 KB) Raw simulation data: xyz coordinates of the nodes of deformed FEA mesh (text format) Figure 2 - panel ab - MATLABcode.m (1.0 KB) MATALB code for plotting panel a b figures (matlab .m format) Figure 2 - panel c - Degree of Anisotropy datacode.m (1.0 KB) MATALB code for plotting panel c graph (matlab .m format) Figure 3 Figure 3 - panel a - App_curve_1_raw_data.txt (35 KB) Raw force-displacement data approach curve 1 (text format) Figure 3 - panel a - App_curve_2_raw_data.txt (34 KB) Raw force-displacement data approach curve 2 (text format) Figure 3 - panel a - App_curve_3_raw_data.txt (34 KB) Raw force-displacement data approach curve 3 (text format) Figure 3 - panel a - App_curve_4_raw_data.txt (34 KB) Raw force-displacement data approach curve 4 (text format) Figure 3 - panel a - Ret_curve_1_raw_data.txt (35 KB) Raw force-displacement data of retract curve 1 (text format) Figure 3 - panel a - Ret_curve_2_raw_data.txt (35 KB) Raw force-displacement data of retract curve 2 (text format) Figure 3 - panel a - Ret_curve_3_raw_data.txt (35 KB) Raw force-displacement data of retract curve 3 (text format) Figure 3 - panel a - Simulation_raw_data-part 1.txt (43 KB) simulated force-displacement data of -part 1 (text format) Figure 3 - panel a - Simulation_raw_data-part 2.txt (43 KB) simulated force-displacement data of -part 2 (text format) Figure 3 - panel a - FCfindc.m (2 KB) MATLAB code to calculate inverse optical lever sensitivity (InverseOLS) of AFM cantelever (matlab .m format) Figure 3 - panel a - FreqFindANoise_new.m (2 KB) MATLAB code to calculate white noise constant, A (Explained in the Read me file) (matlab .m format) Figure 3 - panel a - FreqFindQ_new.m (4 KB) MATLAB code to calculate Q factor of the AFM cantelever (matlab .m format) Figure 3 - panel a - FCkeff.m (2 KB) MATLAB code to calculate the effective spring constant k of the AFM cantelever (matlab .m format) Figure 3 - panel a - FCimport.m (7 KB) MATLAB code to import raw force-displacement data into MATLAB (matlab .m format) Figure 3 - panel a - FCForceDist.m (2 KB) MATLAB code to convert raw force-displacement data into force-distance data (matlab .m format) Figure 1 - panel e - Read me file - force curve calibration.docx (14 KB) Explains force curve calibration (.docx format) Figure 1 - panel e - Read me file - lever spring constant calibration.docx (14 KB) Explains AFM lever spring constant calibration (.docx format) Figure 3 - panel b - SEM Raw Data.tiff (9 KB) SEM raw image of broken silk membrane due to extreme indentation (.tiff format) 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email