skip to main content

Title: Automatic Measurement of Teachers' Talk: Indicators of Location and Quality in Science Activities
A key goal of Next Generation Science Standards is to promote interest and exploration of natural phenomena. In preschool settings, teachers prompt exploration by asking questions, encouraging informal exploration and experimentation. To date, live or offline video observation has been the sole way to capture the quality of teacher question asking in the pre-k classroom (e.g., Sanders et al., 2016). To date, Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) has not been used to measure the content/quality of teacher talk. Here, we used ASR to quantify preschool teachers’ use of keywords that promote student exploration and inquiry.
Authors:
; ; ; ; ; ;
Award ID(s):
2016725
Publication Date:
NSF-PAR ID:
10180041
Journal Name:
CRIEI-2020: Conf. on Research Innovations in Early Intervention
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Speech and language development in children is crucial for ensuring optimal outcomes in their long term development and life-long educational journey. A child’s vocabulary size at the time of kindergarten entry is an early indicator of learning to read and potential long-term success in school. The preschool classroom is thus a promising venue for monitoring growth in young children by measuring their interactions with teachers and classmates. Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) technologies provide the ability for ‘Early Childhood’ researchers for automatically analyzing naturalistic recordings in these settings. For this purpose, data are collected in a high-quality childcare center in themore »United States using Language Environment Analysis (LENA) devices worn by the preschool children. A preliminary task for ASR of daylong audio recordings would involve diarization, i.e., segmenting speech into smaller parts for identifying ‘who spoke when.’ This study investigates a Deep Learning-based diarization system for classroom interactions of 3-5-year-old children. However, the focus is on ’speaker group’ diarization, which includes classifying speech segments as being from adults or children from across multiple classrooms. SincNet based diarization systems achieve utterance level Diarization Error Rate of 19.1%. Utterance level speaker group confusion matrices also show promising, balanced results. These diarization systems have potential applications in developing metrics for adult-to-child or child-to-child rapid conversational turns in a naturalistic noisy early childhood setting. Such technical advancements will also help teachers better and more efficiently quantify and understand their interactions with children, make changes as needed, and monitor the impact of those changes.« less
  2. This workshop will focus on how to teach data collection and analysis to preschoolers. Our project aims to promote preschoolers’ engagement with, and learning of, mathematics and computational thinking (CT) with a set of classroom activities that engage preschoolers in a data collection and analysis (DCA) process. To do this, the project team is engaging in an iterative cycle of development and testing of hands-on, play-based, curricular investigations with feedback from teachers. A key component of the intervention is a teacher-facing digital app (for teachers to use with students on touch-screen tablets) to support the collaboration of preschool teachers andmore »children in collecting data, creating simple graphs, and using the graphs to answer real-world questions. The curricular investigations offer an applied context for using mathematical knowledge (i.e., counting, sorting, classifying, comparing, contrasting) to engage with real-world investigations and lay the foundation for developing flexible problem-solving skills. Each investigation follows a series of instructional tasks that scaffold the problem-solving process and includes (a) nine hands-on and play-based problem-solving investigations where children answer real-world questions by collecting data, creating simple graphs, and interpreting the graphs and. (b) a teacher- facing digital app to support specific data collection and organization steps (i.e., collecting, recording, visualizing). This workshop will describe: (1) the rationale and prior research conducted in this domain, (2) describe an intervention in development focused on data collection and analysis content for preschoolers that develop mathematical (common core standards) and computational thinking skills (K-12 Computational Thinking Framework Standards), (3) demonstrates an app in development that guides teacher and preschoolers through the investigation process and generates graphs to answer questions (NGSS practice standards), (4) report on feedback from a pilot study conducted virtually in preschool classrooms; and (5) describe developmentally appropriate practices for engaging young children in investigations, data collection, and data analysis.« less
  3. As the importance to integrate engineering into K12 curricula grows so does the need to develop teachers’ engineering teaching capabilities and knowledge. One method that has been used to aid this development is engineering professional development programs. This evaluation paper presents the successes and challenges of an engineering professional development program for teachers focused around the use of engineering problem-framing design activities in high school science classrooms. These activities were designed to incorporate the cross-cutting ideas published in the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) and draw on best practices for instructional design of problem-framing activities from research on design andmore »model-eliciting activities (MEAs). The professional development (PD) was designed to include the following researched-based effective PD key elements: (1) is content focused, (2) incorporates active learning, (3) supports collaboration, (4) uses models of effective practice, (5) provides coaching and expert support, (6) offers feedback and reflection, and (7) is of sustained duration. The engineering PD, including in-classroom deployment of activities and data collection, was designed as an iterative process to be conducted over a three-year period. This will allow for improvement and refinement of our approach. The first iteration, reported in this paper, consisted of seven high school science teachers who have agreed to participate in the PD, implement the problem-framing activities, and collect student data over a period of one year. The PD itself consisted of the teachers comparing science and engineering, participating in problem-framing training and activities, and developing a design challenge scenario for their own courses. The participating teachers completed a survey at the end of the PD that will be used to inform enhancement of the PD and our efforts to recruit additional participants in the following year. The qualitative survey consisted of open-ended questions asking for the most valuable takeaways from the PD, their reasoning for joining the PD, reasons they would or would not recommend the PD, and, in their opinion, what would inspire their colleagues to attend the PD. The responses to the survey along with observations from the team presenting the PD were analyzed to identify lessons learned and future steps for the following iteration of the PD. From the data, three themes emerged: Development of PD, Teacher Motivation, and Teacher Experience.« less
  4. While there has been much progress in the meaningful integration of computer science within K-12 classrooms, there is a need to promote more equitable participation and to improve teacher preparation. One area in which this is needed is in early childhood education. In this paper, we investigated predictors of debugging quality among 19 pre-service early childhood teachers as they engaged in debugging supported by scaffolding. Bayesian regression indicated the following variables predicted debugging quality: debugging process score, English domain identification, performance approach goals, and sentiment analysis scores applied to what students wrote in response to scaffold prompts.
  5. In the decades since Papert published Mindstorms (1980), computation has transformed nearly every branch of scientific practice. Accordingly, there is increasing recognition that computation and computational thinking (CT) must be a core part of STEM education in a broad range of subjects. Previous work has demonstrated the efficacy of incorporating computation into STEM courses and introduced a taxonomy of CT practices in STEM. However, this work rarely involved teachers as more than implementers of units designed by researchers. In The Children’s Machine, Papert asked “What can be done to mobilize the potential force for change inherent in the position ofmore »teachers?” (Papert, 1994, pg. 79). We argue that involving teachers as co-design partners supports them to be cultural change agents in education. We report here on the first phase of a research project in which we worked with STEM educators to co-design curricular science units that incorporate computational thinking and practices. Eight high school teachers and one university professor joined nine members of our research team for a month-long Computational Thinking Summer Institute (CTSI). The co-design process was a constructionist design and learning experience for both the teachers and researchers. We focus here on understanding the co-design process and its implications for teachers by asking: (1) How did teachers shift in their attitudes and confidence regarding CT? (2) What different co-design styles emerged and did any tensions arise? Generally, we found that teachers gained confidence and skills in CT and computational tools over the course of the summer. Only one teacher reported a decrease in confidence in one aspect of CT (computational modeling), but this seemed to result from gaining a broader and more nuanced understanding of this rich area. A range of co-design styles emerged over the summer. Some teachers chose to focus on designing the curriculum and advising on the computational tools to be used in it, while leaving the construction of those tools to their co-designers. Other teachers actively participated in constructing models and computational tools themselves. The pluralism of co-design styles allowed teachers of various comfort levels with computation to meaningfully contribute to a computationally enhanced constructionist curriculum. However, it also led to a tension for some teachers between working to finish their curriculum versus gaining experience with computational tools. In the time crunch to complete their unit during CTSI, some teachers chose to save time by working on the curriculum while their co-design partners (researchers) created the supporting computational tools. These teachers still grew in their computational sophistication, but they could not devote as much time as they wanted to their own computational learning.« less