 NSFPAR ID:
 10180433
 Date Published:
 Journal Name:
 Journal of physical oceanography
 Volume:
 50
 Issue:
 8
 ISSN:
 00223670
 Page Range / eLocation ID:
 21412150
 Format(s):
 Medium: X
 Sponsoring Org:
 National Science Foundation
More Like this

null (Ed.)Abstract Slowly evolving stratified flow over rough topography is subject to substantial drag due to internal motions, but often numerical simulations are carried out at resolutions where this “wave” drag must be parameterized. Here we highlight the importance of internal drag from topography with scales that cannot radiate internal waves, but may be highly nonlinear, and we propose a simple parameterization of this drag that has a minimum of fit parameters compared to existing schemes. The parameterization smoothly transitions from a quadratic drag law ( ) for low Nh / u 0 (linear wave dynamics) to a linear drag law ( ) for high Nh / u 0 flows (nonlinear blocking and hydraulic dynamics), where N is the stratification, h is the height of the topography, and u 0 is the nearbottom velocity; the parameterization does not have a dependence on Coriolis frequency. Simulations carried out in a channel with synthetic bathymetry and steady body forcing indicate that this parameterization accurately predicts drag across a broad range of forcing parameters when the effect of reduced nearbottom mixing is taken into account by reducing the effective height of the topography. The parameterization is also tested in simulations of winddriven channel flows that generate mesoscale eddy fields, a setup where the downstream transport is sensitive to the bottom drag parameterization and its effect on the eddies. In these simulations, the parameterization replicates the effect of rough bathymetry on the eddies. If extrapolated globally, the subinertial topographic scales can account for 2.7 TW of work done on the lowfrequency circulation, an important sink that is redistributed to mixing in the open ocean.more » « less

Abstract We present restframe optical emissionline flux ratio measurements for five
z > 5 galaxies observed by the James Webb Space Telescope NearInfared Spectrograph (NIRSpec) in the SMACS 0723 Early Release Observations. We add several qualitycontrol and postprocessing steps to the NIRSpec pipeline reduction products in order to ensure reliablerelative flux calibration of emission lines that are closely separated in wavelength, despite the uncertainabsolute spectrophotometry of the current version of the reductions. Compared toz ∼ 3 galaxies in the literature, thez > 5 galaxies have similar [Oiii ]λ 5008/Hβ ratios, similar [Oiii ]λ 4364/Hγ ratios, and higher (∼0.5 dex) [NeIII ]λ 3870/[OII ]λ 3728 ratios. We compare the observations to MAPPINGS V photoionization models and find that the measured [NeIII ]λ 3870/[OII ]λ 3728, [Oiii ]λ 4364/Hγ , and [Oiii ]λ 5008/Hβ emissionline ratios are consistent with an interstellar medium (ISM) that has very high ionization ( , units of cm s^{−1}), low metallicity ( $\mathrm{log}(Q)\simeq 89$Z /Z _{⊙}≲ 0.2), and very high pressure ( , units of cm^{−3}). The combination of [O $\mathrm{log}(P/k)\simeq 89$iii ]λ 4364/Hγ and [Oiii ]λ (4960 + 5008)/Hβ line ratios indicate very high electron temperatures of , further implying metallicities of $4.1<\mathrm{log}({T}_{e}/\mathrm{K})<4.4$Z /Z _{⊙}≲ 0.2 with the application of lowredshift calibrations for “T _{e}based” metallicities. These observations represent a tantalizing new view of the physical conditions of the ISM in galaxies at cosmic dawn. 
Abstract We present a measurement of the highenergy astrophysical muon–neutrino flux with the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. The measurement uses a highpurity selection of 650k neutrinoinduced muon tracks from the northern celestial hemisphere, corresponding to 9.5 yr of experimental data. With respect to previous publications, the measurement is improved by the increased size of the event sample and the extended model testing beyond simple powerlaw hypotheses. An updated treatment of systematic uncertainties and atmospheric background fluxes has been implemented based on recent models. The bestfit single powerlaw parameterization for the astrophysical energy spectrum results in a normalization of ϕ @ 100 TeV ν μ + ν ¯ μ = 1.44 − 0.26 + 0.25 × 10 − 18 GeV − 1 cm − 2 s − 1 sr − 1 and a spectral index γ SPL = 2.37 − 0.09 + 0.09 , constrained in the energy range from 15 TeV to 5 PeV. The model tests include a single power law with a spectral cutoff at high energies, a logparabola model, several sourceclassspecific flux predictions from the literature, and a modelindependent spectral unfolding. The data are consistent with a single powerlaw hypothesis, however, spectra with softening above one PeV are statistically more favorable at a twosigma level.more » « less

Abstract Massive elliptical galaxies harbor large amounts of hot gas (
T ≳ 10^{6}K) in their interstellar medium (ISM) but are typically quiescent in star formation. The jets of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) inject energy into the ISM, which offsets its radiative losses and keeps it hot. SNe Ia deposit their energy locally within the galaxy compared to the larger few ×10 kiloparsecscale AGN jets. In this study, we perform highresolution (512^{3}) hydrodynamic simulations of a local (1 kpc^{3}) densitystratified patch of the ISM of massive galaxies. We include radiative cooling and shellaveraged volume heating, as well as randomly exploding SN Ia. We study the effect of different fractions of supernova (SN) heating (with respect to the net cooling rate), different initial ISM density/entropy (which controls the growth timet _{ti}of the thermal instability), and different degrees of stratification (which affect the freefall timet _{ff}). We find that SNe Ia drive predominantly compressive turbulence in the ISM with a velocity dispersion ofσ _{v}up to 40 km s^{−1}and logarithmic density dispersion ofσ _{s}∼ 0.2–0.4. These fluctuations trigger multiphase condensation in regions of the ISM, where , in agreement with theoretical expectations that large density fluctuations efficiently trigger multiphase gas formation. Since the SN Ia rate is not selfadjusting, when the net cooling drops below the net heating rate, SNe Ia drive a hot wind which sweeps out most of the mass in our local model. Global simulations are required to assess the ultimate fate of this gas. $\mathrm{min}({t}_{\mathrm{ti}})/{t}_{\mathrm{ff}}\lesssim 0.6\mathrm{exp}(6{\sigma}_{s})$ 
Abstract The softmax policy gradient (PG) method, which performs gradient ascent under softmax policy parameterization, is arguably one of the de facto implementations of policy optimization in modern reinforcement learning. For
discounted infinitehorizon tabular Markov decision processes (MDPs), remarkable progress has recently been achieved towards establishing global convergence of softmax PG methods in finding a nearoptimal policy. However, prior results fall short of delineating clear dependencies of convergence rates on salient parameters such as the cardinality of the state space$$\gamma $$ $\gamma $ and the effective horizon$${\mathcal {S}}$$ $S$ , both of which could be excessively large. In this paper, we deliver a pessimistic message regarding the iteration complexity of softmax PG methods, despite assuming access to exact gradient computation. Specifically, we demonstrate that the softmax PG method with stepsize$$\frac{1}{1\gamma }$$ $\frac{1}{1\gamma}$ can take$$\eta $$ $\eta $ to converge, even in the presence of a benign policy initialization and an initial state distribution amenable to exploration (so that the distribution mismatch coefficient is not exceedingly large). This is accomplished by characterizing the algorithmic dynamics over a carefullyconstructed MDP containing only three actions. Our exponential lower bound hints at the necessity of carefully adjusting update rules or enforcing proper regularization in accelerating PG methods.$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{\eta } {\mathcal {S}}^{2^{\Omega \big (\frac{1}{1\gamma }\big )}} ~\text {iterations} \end{aligned}$$ $\begin{array}{c}\frac{1}{\eta}{\leftS\right}^{{2}^{\Omega (\frac{1}{1\gamma})}}\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}\text{iterations}\end{array}$