skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Deciphering an extreme morphology: bone microarchitecture of the hero shrew backbone (Soricidae: Scutisorex )
Biological structures with extreme morphologies are puzzling because they often lack obvious functions and stymie comparisons to homologous or analogous features with more typical shapes. An example of such an extreme morphotype is the uniquely modified vertebral column of the hero shrew Scutisorex , which features numerous accessory intervertebral articulations and massively expanded transverse processes. The function of these vertebral structures is unknown, and it is difficult to meaningfully compare them to vertebrae from animals with known behavioural patterns and spinal adaptations. Here, we use trabecular bone architecture of vertebral centra and quantitative external vertebral morphology to elucidate the forces that may act on the spine of Scutisorex and that of another large shrew with unmodified vertebrae ( Crocidura goliath ). X-ray micro-computed tomography (µCT) scans of thoracolumbar columns show that Scutisorex thori is structurally intermediate between C. goliath and S. somereni internally and externally, and both Scutisorex species exhibit trabecular bone characteristics indicative of higher in vivo axial compressive loads than C. goliath. Under compressive load, Scutisorex vertebral morphology is adapted to largely restrict bending to the sagittal plane (flexion). Although these findings do not solve the mystery of how Scutisorex uses its byzantine spine in vivo , our work suggests potentially fruitful new avenues of investigation for learning more about the function of this perplexing structure.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1811627
PAR ID:
10191863
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volume:
287
Issue:
1926
ISSN:
0962-8452
Page Range / eLocation ID:
20200457
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. The regionalized vertebral column is a hallmark of mammalian morphology and reflects functional differentiation of the vertebral regions. Mammalian vertebrae are serially homologous and morphologically patterened by Hox expression, but also vary in number and gross morphology across species. The trabecular bone inside vertebral centra is more plastic than gross vertebral bone, and structurally adapts to better withstand forces it experiences during life. However, the functional regionalization of vertebral trabecular bone is poorly examined. Are there trabecular "regions” reflecting the differing functions and in-vivo stress patterns of gross morphological vertebral regions? Or is trabecular morphology homogeneous throughout the spine, suggesting that differences in functional demands are borne exclusively by external characteristics? To address these questions, we collected μCT scans and linear measurements of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar vertebrae in four species of large shrews, including two species of the hero shrew Scutisorex, which has a highly modified vertebral column. We compared linear measurements and trabecular bone characteristics of the cranial and caudal ends of each centrum across species. To detect unique vertebral regions, we executed principal coordinates analysis and segmented regression on three versions of our data set: trabecular bone data only, external measurements only, and the two combined. We found that some regionalization is recovered using only trabecular bone data, but trabecular bone regions do not correspond exactly to gross vertebral regions. This reflects divergence between the functional signals of internal and external vertebral bone morphology, which should be further examined in a kinematic context. 
    more » « less
  2. In addition to having unique extra articulations on its vertebrae, the hero shrew (Scutisorex) is unusual in having almost twice as many lumbar vertebrae as other shrews of its size. Other than being noted in descriptive literature, this increase in vertebral number has received little attention; there has been no investigation of how it might reflect the elusive function of the highly modified Scutisorex spine. Comparisons of individual vertebrae and whole-column characteristics between Scutisorex and other large shrews are also lacking, despite the fact that such studies could give insight into i) function of particular vertebral regions in shrews with and without external vertebral modifications, and ii) developmental patterns driving regional proportions. We collected μCT scans and linear measurements of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar vertebrae in two species of Scutisorex and three other species of large shrews. We compared a variety of linear vertebra measurements, and trabecular bone characteristics of each centrum, across species. Further, using this combined suite of measurements, we executed principal coordinates analysis and segmented regression to detect unique vertebral regions in each taxon. Our results show that relative to other large shrews, Scutisorex has a shorter thoracic region and longer lumbar region, and, despite having more dorsal vertebrae than other species, does not have a proportionally longer body length. Regionalization signals vary within and across the five species, but generally suggest that functional regions may not correspond exactly with traditionally recognized anatomical regions of the column, and that the extended lumbar region in Scutisorex may afford it an additional functional region. 
    more » « less
  3. Captive (zoo) specimens in natural history collections allow researchers to inspect the morphologies of rare or CITES-listed taxa, but the lifestyles, diets, and lifespans of captive animals differ from those of their wild counterparts. To quantify these differences, we compared trabecular bone architecture (TBA) of dorsal vertebrae in captive and wild specimens of xenarthran mammals (anteaters, armadillos, and sloths). Because TBA develops following in-vivo bone force regimes, it reflects ecology and behavior, but this also means that it may differ between captive and wild specimens of the same species. We collected μCT scans of the last six presacral vertebrae in 15 species of fossorial, terrestrial, and suspensorial xenarthrans ranging in body mass from 120g (Chlamyphorus) to 35kg (Myrmecophaga). For each vertebra, we measured bone volume fraction (BVF), trabecular number (TbN), mean trabecular thickness (TbTh), degree of anisotropy, and trabecular orientation. We found that wild specimens generally have a greater BVF, TbN, and TbTh than captive specimens, but that these metrics differ by species, vertebral position, ecology, and pathology. Wild specimens of Dasypus have greater BVF, TbN, and TbTh than captive specimens in the three most posterior lumbar vertebrae, but have much closer metrics in the anterior three vertebrae. In Choloepus, BVF, TbN, and TbTn are greater in wild specimens in the anterior vertebrae and more similar in the posterior vertebrae. Arthritis in captive Tamandua increased BVF and TbTh, whereas wild specimens had greater TbN. Our results add to overall understanding of variation in mammalian vertebral trabecular bone, and suggest caution when including captive specimens in research on the relationship between TBA and ecology. 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract Trabecular bone is modelled throughout an animal’s life in response to its mechanical environment, but like other skeletal anatomy, it is also subject to evolutionary influences. Yet the relative strengths of factors that affect trabecular bone architecture are little studied. We investigated these influences across the Philippine endemic murine rodent clade Chrotomyini. These mammals have robustly established phylogenetic relationships, exhibit a range of well-documented substrate-use types, and have a body size range spanning several hundred grammes, making them ideal for a tractable study of extrinsic and intrinsic influences on trabecular bone morphology. We found slight differences in vertebral trabecular bone among different substrate-use categories, with more divergent characteristics in more ecologically specialized taxa. This suggests that the mechanical environment must be relatively extreme to affect trabecular bone morphology in small mammals. We also recovered allometric patterns that imply that selective pressures on bone may differ between small and large mammals. Finally, we found high intrataxonomic variation in trabecular bone morphology, but it is not clearly related to any variable we measured, and may represent a normal degree of variation in these animals rather than a functional trait. Future studies should address how this plasticity affects biomechanical properties and performance of the skeleton. 
    more » « less
  5. Thresher sharks (Alopiasspp.) are characterized by an elongated, scythe-like caudal fin that is used in tail-whipping, a behaviour where the tail is thrown overhead to stun prey. Tail-whipping is performed via extreme dorsoventral bending of the vertebral column, and is dramatically different from lateral oscillatory motion used for swimming. Previous work has examined thresher shark vertebral morphology and mechanical properties, but in the context of swimming loads. Our goal was to assess centra morphometrics and microarchitecture for variations that may support extreme dorsoventral bending. We examined anterior and posterior body vertebrae from an embryo, five juvenile, and four adult thresher sharks using micro-computed tomography. We used principal component and landmark analyses to examine variables influencing vertebral morphology and mineral arrangement, respectively. We found that morphology and microstructure significantly varied across body regions and ontogeny. We hypothesize that anterior body vertebrae increase stability, while posterior body vertebrae support the caudal fin. Vertebral size and quantity of mineral structures (lamellae and nodes) increased across ontogeny, suggesting vertebrae adapt over development to support a larger body and tail. Based on our results, we hypothesize that thresher shark vertebrae vary in morphometrics and mineralization (amount and arrangement) supporting the mechanical needs for tail-whipping. 
    more » « less