More Like this

1. Robustly Self-Ordered Graphs: Constructions and Applications to Property Testing

   Goldreich, Oded ; Wigderson, Avi ( November 2020 , Electronic colloquium on computational complexity)

   null (Ed.)

   A graph G is called {\em self-ordered} (a.k.a asymmetric) if the identity permutation is its only automorphism. Equivalently, there is a unique isomorphism from G to any graph that is isomorphic to G. We say that G=(VE) is {\em robustly self-ordered}if the size of the symmetric difference between E and the edge-set of the graph obtained by permuting V using any permutation :VV is proportional to the number of non-fixed-points of . In this work, we initiate the study of the structure, construction and utility of robustly self-ordered graphs. We show that robustly self-ordered bounded-degree graphs exist (in abundance), and that they can be constructed efficiently, in a strong sense. Specifically, given the index of a vertex in such a graph, it is possible to find all its neighbors in polynomial-time (i.e., in time that is poly-logarithmic in the size of the graph). We provide two very different constructions, in tools and structure. The first, a direct construction, is based on proving a sufficient condition for robust self-ordering, which requires that an auxiliary graph, on {\em pairs} of vertices of the original graph, is expanding. In this case the original graph is (not only robustly self-ordered but) also expanding. The second construction proceeds in three steps: It boosts the mere existence of robustly self-ordered graphs, which provides explicit graphs of sublogarithmic size, to an efficient construction of polynomial-size graphs, and then, repeating it again, to exponential-size(robustly self-ordered) graphs that are locally constructible. This construction can yield robustly self-ordered graphs that are either expanders or highly disconnected, having logarithmic size connected components. We also consider graphs of unbounded degree, seeking correspondingly unbounded robustness parameters. We again demonstrate that such graphs (of linear degree)exist (in abundance), and that they can be constructed efficiently, in a strong sense. This turns out to require very different tools. Specifically, we show that the construction of such graphs reduces to the construction of non-malleable two-source extractors with very weak parameters but with some additional natural features. We actually show two reductions, one simpler than the other but yielding a less efficient construction when combined with the known constructions of extractors. We demonstrate that robustly self-ordered bounded-degree graphs are useful towards obtaining lower bounds on the query complexity of testing graph properties both in the bounded-degree and the dense graph models. Indeed, their robustness offers efficient, local and distance preserving reductions from testing problems on ordered structures (like sequences) to the unordered (effectively unlabeled) graphs. One of the results that we obtain, via such a reduction, is a subexponential separation between the query complexities of testing and tolerant testing of graph properties in the bounded-degree graph model. Changes to previous version: We retract the claims made in our initial posting regarding the construction of non-malleable two-source extractors (which are quasi-orthogonal) as well as the claims about the construction of relocation-detecting codes (see Theorems 1.5 and 1.6 in the original version). The source of trouble is a fundamental flaw in the proof of Lemma 9.7 (in the original version), which may as well be wrong. Hence, the original Section 9 was omitted, except that the original Section 9.3 was retained as a new Section 8.3. The original Section 8 appears as Section 8.0 and 8.1, and Section 8.2 is new. 

   more » « less
2. The Polynomial Method Strikes Back: Tight Quantum Query Bounds via Dual Polynomials

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3188745.3188784  

   Bun, Mark ; Kothari, Robin ; Thaler, Justin ( October 2020 , Theory of computing)

   null (Ed.)

   The approximate degree of a Boolean function f is the least degree of a real polynomial that approximates f pointwise to error at most 1/3. The approximate degree of f is known to be a lower bound on the quantum query complexity of f (Beals et al., FOCS 1998 and J. ACM 2001). We find tight or nearly tight bounds on the approximate degree and quantum query complexities of several basic functions. Specifically, we show the following. k-Distinctness: For any constant k, the approximate degree and quantum query complexity of the k-distinctness function is Ω(n3/4−1/(2k)). This is nearly tight for large k, as Belovs (FOCS 2012) has shown that for any constant k, the approximate degree and quantum query complexity of k-distinctness is O(n3/4−1/(2k+2−4)). Image size testing: The approximate degree and quantum query complexity of testing the size of the image of a function [n]→[n] is Ω~(n1/2). This proves a conjecture of Ambainis et al. (SODA 2016), and it implies tight lower bounds on the approximate degree and quantum query complexity of the following natural problems. k-Junta testing: A tight Ω~(k1/2) lower bound for k-junta testing, answering the main open question of Ambainis et al. (SODA 2016). Statistical distance from uniform: A tight Ω~(n1/2) lower bound for approximating the statistical distance of a distribution from uniform, answering the main question left open by Bravyi et al. (STACS 2010 and IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011). Shannon entropy: A tight Ω~(n1/2) lower bound for approximating Shannon entropy up to a certain additive constant, answering a question of Li and Wu (2017). Surjectivity: The approximate degree of the surjectivity function is Ω~(n3/4). The best prior lower bound was Ω(n2/3). Our result matches an upper bound of O~(n3/4) due to Sherstov (STOC 2018), which we reprove using different techniques. The quantum query complexity of this function is known to be Θ(n) (Beame and Machmouchi, Quantum Inf. Comput. 2012 and Sherstov, FOCS 2015). Our upper bound for surjectivity introduces new techniques for approximating Boolean functions by low-degree polynomials. Our lower bounds are proved by significantly refining techniques recently introduced by Bun and Thaler (FOCS 2017). 

   more » « less
3. Sample Complexity of Adversarially Robust Linear Classification on Separated Data

   Bhattacharjee, Robi ; Jha, Somesh and ( July 2021 , Proceedings of Machine Learning Research)

   null (Ed.)

   We consider the sample complexity of learning with adversarial robustness. Most prior theoretical results for this problem have considered a setting where different classes in the data are close together or overlapping. We consider, in contrast, the well-separated case where there exists a classifier with perfect accuracy and robustness, and show that the sample complexity narrates an entirely different story. Specifically, for linear classifiers, we show a large class of well-separated distributions where the expected robust loss of any algorithm is at least Ω(𝑑𝑛), whereas the max margin algorithm has expected standard loss 𝑂(1𝑛). This shows a gap in the standard and robust losses that cannot be obtained via prior techniques. Additionally, we present an algorithm that, given an instance where the robustness radius is much smaller than the gap between the classes, gives a solution with expected robust loss is 𝑂(1𝑛). This shows that for very well-separated data, convergence rates of 𝑂(1𝑛) are achievable, which is not the case otherwise. Our results apply to robustness measured in any ℓ𝑝 norm with 𝑝>1 (including 𝑝=∞). 

   more » « less
4. Stable super-resolution of images: theoretical study

   https://doi.org/10.1093/imaiai/iaaa029  

   Eftekhari, Armin ; Bendory, Tamir ; Tang, Gongguo ( November 2020 , Information and Inference: A Journal of the IMA)

   null (Ed.)

   Abstract We study the ubiquitous super-resolution problem, in which one aims at localizing positive point sources in an image, blurred by the point spread function of the imaging device. To recover the point sources, we propose to solve a convex feasibility program, which simply finds a non-negative Borel measure that agrees with the observations collected by the imaging device. In the absence of imaging noise, we show that solving this convex program uniquely retrieves the point sources, provided that the imaging device collects enough observations. This result holds true if the point spread function of the imaging device can be decomposed into horizontal and vertical components and if the translations of these components form a Chebyshev system, i.e., a system of continuous functions that loosely behave like algebraic polynomials. Building upon the recent results for one-dimensional signals, we prove that this super-resolution algorithm is stable, in the generalized Wasserstein metric, to model mismatch (i.e., when the image is not sparse) and to additive imaging noise. In particular, the recovery error depends on the noise level and how well the image can be approximated with well-separated point sources. As an example, we verify these claims for the important case of a Gaussian point spread function. The proofs rely on the construction of novel interpolating polynomials—which are the main technical contribution of this paper—and partially resolve the question raised in Schiebinger et al. (2017, Inf. Inference, 7, 1–30) about the extension of the standard machinery to higher dimensions. 

   more » « less
5. Polynomial-Time Power-Sum Decomposition of Polynomials

   https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS54457.2022.00094  

   Bafna, Mitali ; Hsieh, Jun-Ting ; Kothari, Pravesh K. ; Xu, Jeff ( October 2022 , 2022 IEEE 63rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS))

   We give efficient algorithms for finding power-sum decomposition of an input polynomial with component s. The case of linear s is equivalent to the well-studied tensor decomposition problem while the quadratic case occurs naturally in studying identifiability of non-spherical Gaussian mixtures from low-order moments. Unlike tensor decomposition, both the unique identifiability and algorithms for this problem are not well-understood. For the simplest setting of quadratic s and , prior work of [GHK15] yields an algorithm only when . On the other hand, the more general recent result of [GKS20] builds an algebraic approach to handle any components but only when is large enough (while yielding no bounds for or even ) and only handles an inverse exponential noise. Our results obtain a substantial quantitative improvement on both the prior works above even in the base case of and quadratic s. Specifically, our algorithm succeeds in decomposing a sum of generic quadratic s for and more generally the th power-sum of generic degree- polynomials for any . Our algorithm relies only on basic numerical linear algebraic primitives, is exact (i.e., obtain arbitrarily tiny error up to numerical precision), and handles an inverse polynomial noise when the s have random Gaussian coefficients. 

   more » « less