skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


  • NSF Public Access
  • Search Results
  • Mapping the “long tail” of research funding: A topic analysis of NSF grant proposals in the division of astronomical sciences
Title: Mapping the “long tail” of research funding: A topic analysis of NSF grant proposals in the division of astronomical sciences
“Long tail” data are considered to be smaller, heterogeneous, researcher‐held data, which present unique data management and scholarly communication challenges. These data are presumably concentrated within relatively lower‐funded projects due to insufficient resources for curation. To better understand the nature and distribution of long tail data, we examine National Science Foundation (NSF) funding patterns using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and bibliographic data. We also introduce the concept of “Topic Investment” to capture differences in topics across funding levels and to illuminate the distribution of funding across topics. This study uses the discipline of astronomy as a case study, overall exploring possible associations between topic, funding level and research output, with implications for research policy and practice. We find that while different topics demonstrate different funding levels and publication patterns, dynamics predicted by the “long tail” theoretical framework presented here can be observed within NSF‐funded topics in astronomy.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1642446
PAR ID:
10201652
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Volume:
57
Issue:
1
Page Range / eLocation ID:
e276
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. (, Oceanography)
    In 2016, the National Science Foundation (NSF) identified 10 “Big Ideas” for advancing science and engineering research and guiding long-term US research investments. Navigating the New Arctic (NNA) was one of those big ideas, highlighting NSF’s continued commitment to funding research to help societies respond to a warming Arctic. NNA focuses on convergence—collaborations formed from deep integration across disciplines and knowledge systems to address vexing and complex research challenges that are pivotal for meeting societal needs (Wilson, 2019). The NNA initiative has funded over 100 individual and collaborative research projects since 2017, addressing topics ranging from thawing permafrost, to shifting weather patterns, increasing shipping, and adapting food systems. Research teams funded by NNA to work across the Arctic are composed of scientists from diverse disciplines, Indigenous knowledge holders, practitioners, planners, and engineers. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; (, Biomedical Engineering Education)
    Abstract Whether doctoral students are funded primarily by fellowships, research assistantships, or teaching assistantships impacts their degree completion, time to degree, learning outcomes, and short- and long-term career outcomes. Variations in funding patterns have been studied at the broad field level but not comparing engineering sub-disciplines. We addressed two research questions: How do PhD student funding mechanisms vary across engineering sub-disciplines? And how does variation in funding mechanisms across engineering sub-disciplines map onto the larger STEM disciplinary landscape? We analyzed 103,373 engineering and computing responses to the U.S. Survey of Earned Doctorates collected between 2007 and 2016. We conducted analysis of variance with Bonferroni post hoc comparisons to examine variation in funding across sub-disciplines. Then, we conducted a k-means cluster analysis on percentage variables for fellowship, research, and teaching assistantship funding mechanism with STEM sub-discipline as the unit of analysis. A statistically significantly greater percentage of biomedical/biological engineering doctoral students were funded via a fellowship, compared to every other engineering sub-discipline. Consequently, biomedical/biological engineering had significantly lower proportions of students supported via research and teaching assistantships than nearly all other engineering sub-disciplines. We identified five clusters. The majority of engineering sub-disciplines grouped together into a cluster with high research assistantships and low teaching assistantships. Biomedical/biological engineering clustered in the high fellowships grouping with most other biological sciences but no other engineering sub-disciplines. Biomedical/biological engineering behaves much more like biological and life sciences in utilizing fellowships to fund graduate students, far more than other engineering sub-disciplines. Our study provides further evidence of the prevalence of fellowships in life sciences and how it stretches into biomedical/biological engineering. The majority of engineering sub-disciplines relied more on research assistantships to fund graduate study. The lack of uniformity provides an opportunity to diversify student experiences during their graduate programs but also necessitates an awareness to the advantages and disadvantages that different funding portfolios can bestow on students. 
    more » « less
  3. ; (, 2023 Annual Conference and Exposition)
    Too few two-year technical and community colleges pursue funding from the National Science Foundation (NSF). Instead, they tend to rely on the U.S. Department of Education or the U.S. Department of Labor for federal grants. From the way grant funding opportunities are announced, to the processes used in reviewing proposals and making funding decisions, to the policies and procedures that govern submission of proposals and implementation of grants, NSF operates differently from other federal funding agencies that make grant awards. The Advanced Technological Education (ATE) Program is unique within NSF because of its focus on two-year colleges and workforce development, specifically for those who complete for-credit programs of study and earn credentials that enable program completers to enter the skilled technical workforce. NSF expects faculty to be involved in developing proposals and implementing projects funded by the agency. Meeting this expectation requires a paradigm shift for many community and technical colleges where the primary emphasis is on teaching and where there is seldom any expectation that faculty will contribute to college efforts to secure external funding from federal sources. In addition, in 2021, the overall NSF funding rate was 26% which presents daunting odds for success. However, 10 years of research demonstrate the effectiveness of an intervention that dramatically increases the funding rate for two-year colleges seeking funding from the NSF ATE Program. Since 2012, the Mentor-Connect initiative has been funded by the NSF ATE Program to help two-year college technician educators and related STEM faculty develop the grant-writing skills needed to meet NSF expectations and benefit from ATE funding. Over the past decade, 80% of Mentor-Connect participants have successfully submitted proposals. To date, the average funding rate for these proposals is 71%. This paper describes how the Mentor-Connect intervention works and for whom, what outcomes have resulted for participants who become grantees, and how two-year colleges and technician educators can benefit. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; (, 2025 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference & Exposition)
    The National Science Foundation (NSF)-funded Research in the Formation of Engineers (RFE) project titled “NSF Engineering Research Centers Unite: Developing and Testing a Suite of Instruments to Enhance Overall Education Program Evaluation” aims to address the need for comprehensive evaluation tools designed specifically for NSF Engineering Research Centers (ERCs). The primary goals of the project include the creation of a Multi-ERC Instrument Inventory (MERCII), a suite of both quantitative and qualitative instruments that ERCs can use to evaluate their educational efforts. The main survey, which is modular in nature, has been converted into an operational platform/website to streamline implementation. The MERCII Platform has gone through several iterations internally, with a concentration this past year on addressing bugs and unanticipated errors. The quantitative survey on the platform currently includes 10 sections: research center affiliation, understanding of the research center, impact on skills, culture of inclusion, mentorship experience, industry engagement, innovation and entrepreneurship, STEM-related future plans, program satisfaction, and demographic information. Pilot data from participating ERCs and other large STEM-focused centers has been used to demonstrate initial validity and trustworthiness associated with the tools, which provide a foundation for expanded use. Modifications have been made to some of the qualitative instruments, which were updated and used to evaluate programs this year. To guide newly funded centers and enhance evaluation within and across ERCs, new content has been drafted for the NSF Engineering Research Centers’ Best Practices Manual. The next steps for the project are to address the sustainability of the MERCII. Now that NSF funding is coming to an end, a permanent home for the MERCII Platform needs to be established, as is a model for ongoing technical support. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, Dryad)
    The COVID Information Commons (CIC) is an open website portal and community to facilitate knowledge-sharing and collaboration across various COVID research efforts, funded by the NSF Convergence Accelerator and the  NSF Technology, Innovation and Partnerships Directorate. The CIC serves as an open resource for researchers, students, and decision-makers from academia, government, not-for-profits and industry to identify collaboration opportunities, to leverage each other's research findings, and to accelerate the most promising research to mitigate the broad societal impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. The CIC was developed as a collaborative proposal led by the Northeast Big Data Innovation Hub, hosted by Columbia University, in collaboration with the Midwest Big Data Innovation Hub, South Big Data Innovation Hub, and West Big Data Innovation Hub.  It was funded by the NSF Convergence Accelerator (NSF #2028999) in May  2020 and launched in July 2020.  The initial focus of the CIC website was on the 723 NSF-funded COVID Rapid Response Research (RAPID) projects funded in 2020. The CIC-E: COVID Information Commons Extension for Pandemic Recovery project was proposed and funded in 2021 (NSF #2139391) by the CIC project team with the goal to increase researcher collaboration across NSF and NIH awardees and with global collaborators, as we continue to combat the novel coronavirus, and glean learnings for future uses of innovations developed for COVID response and recovery, including potential insights which can be leveraged for future pandemics. The CIC extension launched on June 30, 2022 increasing the corpus of awards from just NSF to include NIH-funded COVID related awards, both present and past, through all funding vehicles, in pertinent areas of COVID research, response and recovery. The CIC-extension provides more opportunity for multi-agency and multidisciplinary research collaboration as all the Principal Investigators (PIs) for awards in the CIC are invited to present their research and collaborate on CIC Research Lighting Talk Webinars and Collaboration Sessions. The COVID Information Commons (CIC) archive in Dryad includes the NSF and NIH COVID-related awards in the CIC, as well as links to valuable COVID-related datasets, groups, guides and artifacts including videos and transcripts of the CIC researcher lightning talks. The CIC archive was created in Dryad in 2024 at 84.24 MB and is updated annually. The 2025 update to the CIC archive in Dryad is 91.94 MB. It can be cited as follows: Hudson, Florence et al. (2024). COVID information commons archive [Dataset]. Dryad. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.37pvmcvqp 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email