More Like this

1. The Gaia–Kepler Stellar Properties Catalog. II. Planet Radius Demographics as a Function of Stellar Mass and Age

   https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aba18a  

   Berger, Travis A. ; Huber, Daniel ; Gaidos, Eric ; van Saders, Jennifer L. ; Weiss, Lauren M. ( September 2020 , The Astronomical Journal)

   null (Ed.)
2. Photometric and Spectroscopic Properties of Type Ia Supernova 2018oh with Early Excess Emission from the Kepler 2 Observations

   https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaec74  

   Li, W. ; Wang, X. ; Vinkó, J. ; Mo, J. ; Hosseinzadeh, G. ; Sand, D. J. ; Zhang, J. ; Lin, H. ; Zhang, T. ; Wang, L. ; et al ( January 2019 , The Astrophysical Journal)
3. Revising Properties of Planet–Host Binary Systems. III. There Is No Observed Radius Gap for Kepler Planets in Binary Star Systems*  

   https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/acbdf9  

   Sullivan, Kendall ; Kraus, Adam L. ; Huber, Daniel ; Petigura, Erik A. ; Evans, Elise ; Dupuy, Trent ; Zhang, Jingwen ; Berger, Travis A. ; Gaidos, Eric ; Mann, Andrew W. ( March 2023 , The Astronomical Journal)

   Binary stars are ubiquitous; the majority of solar-type stars exist in binaries. Exoplanet occurrence rate is suppressed in binaries, but some multiples do still host planets. Binaries cause observational biases in planet parameters, with undetected multiplicity causing transiting planets to appear smaller than they truly are. We have analyzed the properties of a sample of 119 planet-host binary stars from the Kepler mission to study the underlying population of planets in binaries that fall in and around the radius valley, which is a demographic feature in period–radius space that marks the transition from predominantly rocky to predominantly gaseous planets. We found no statistically significant evidence for a radius gap for our sample of 122 planets in binaries when assuming that the primary stars are the planet hosts, with a low probability (p< 0.05) of the binary planet sample radius distribution being consistent with the single-star population of small planets via an Anderson–Darling test. These results reveal demographic differences in the planet size distribution between planets in binary and single stars for the first time, showing that stellar multiplicity may fundamentally alter the planet formation process. A larger sample and further assessment of circumprimary versus circumsecondary transits is needed to either validate this nondetection or explore other scenarios, such as a radius gap with a location that is dependent on binary separation.

    

   more » « less
4. The Stars Kepler Missed: Investigating the Kepler Target Selection Function Using Gaia DR2

   https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/abee1d  

   Wolniewicz, Linnea M. ; Berger, Travis A. ; Huber, Daniel ( April 2021 , The Astronomical Journal)
5. Six new rapidly oscillating Ap stars in the Kepler long-cadence data using super-Nyquist asteroseismology

   https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1633  

   Hey, Daniel R ; Holdsworth, Daniel L ; Bedding, Timothy R ; Murphy, Simon J ; Cunha, Margarida S ; Kurtz, Donald W ; Huber, Daniel ; Fulton, Benjamin ; Howard, Andrew W ( June 2019 , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society)