skip to main content


Title: Personal Comfort Node: Prototyping of a Comfort Sensor for HVAC Control
Award ID(s):
1646229
NSF-PAR ID:
10210381
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of undergraduate research
Volume:
22
ISSN:
2638-0668
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Lighting, as a significant component of indoor environment quality, was found to be a primary contributor to deficient indoor environments in today’s workplace. This resulted from the fact that current guidelines are derived from empirical values and neglect the prevalence of computer-based tasks in current offices. A personal visual comfort model was designed to predict the degree of an individual’s visual comfort, as a way of evaluating the indoor lighting of the environment. Development of the model relied on experimental data, including individual eye pupil sizes, visual sensations, and visual satisfaction in response to various illuminance levels used for tests of six human subjects. The results showed that (1) A personal comfort model was needed, (2) the personal comfort model produced a median accuracy of 0.7086 for visual sensation and 0.65467 for visual satisfaction for all subjects; (3) To develop a prediction model for the sample group, the Support Vector Machine algorithm,, outperformed the Logistic Regression and the Gaussian Naïve Bayes in terms of prediction accuracy. It was concluded that, a personal visual comfort model can use a building’s occupant’s eye pupil size to generate an accurate prediction of that occupant’s visual sensations and visual satisfaction that can, therefore, be applied with lighting control to improve the indoor environment and energy use in that building. 
    more » « less
  2. null (Ed.)
    Buildings use 40% of the global energy consumption and emit 30% of the CO2 emissions [1]. Of the total building energy, 30-40% are for building heating and cooling systems, which regulate the indoor thermal environment and provide thermal comfort to occupants. In the United States, most buildings use forced air technology to deliver heating/cooling to the targeted thermal zones. However, this system may cause complaints about thermal comfort from inhabitants due to excessive draft movement, inhomogeneous conditioning, and difficulty in accurately controlling the temperature for a system serving multiple rooms. Therefore, researchers have suggested using a radiant heating and cooling system as a better alternative to all-air systems to address these issues. Radiant systems supply heating or cooling directly to the building space using radiation released by the heated or cooled building enclosure via the embedded heating or cooling tubes. In the cooling season, the radiant system often works with a separated dehumidifier to meet space latent and sensible cooling load (called separate sensible and latent cooling system SSLC). The SSLC has shown higher efficiency than forced air systems. However, it is unsure whether the radiant heating and cooling system can provide better thermal comfort to occupants. Moreover, the evaluation method for thermal comfort in the current standard is suitable for forced air systems. Therefore, a new method shall be developed to evaluate the radiation system’s thermal comfort. In this paper, we review the experiment-based studies on the thermal comfort of radiant systems. According to the experimental studies regarding thermal comfort and radiant systems, the key findings are concluded to help guide the evaluation of thermal comfort for radiant systems. 
    more » « less
  3. Buildings use 40% of the global energy consumption and emit 30% of CO2 emissions. Of the total building energy, 30-40% is for building heating and cooling systems, which regulate the indoor thermal environment and provide thermal comfort to occupants. Most buildings use forced air technology in the United States to deliver heating/cooling to the targeted thermal zones. Researchers have suggested using radiant heating and cooling systems as a better alternative to all-air systems. Radiant systems supply heating or cooling directly to the building space using radiation released by the heated or cooled building enclosure via the embedded heating or cooling tubes. It is unsure whether the radiant heating and cooling system can provide better thermal comfort to occupants. Moreover, the evaluation method for thermal comfort in the current standard is only suitable for forced air systems. A new plan shall be developed to evaluate the radiation system’s thermal comfort. This paper reviews the experiment-based studies on the thermal comfort of radiant systems. According to the experimental studies regarding thermal comfort and radiant systems, the key findings are concluded to help guide the evaluation of thermal comfort for radiant systems. 
    more » « less
  4. User perceived exoskeleton comfort is likely important for device acceptance, but there is currently no validated instrument to measure it. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is an existing tool to measure subjective human feedback by asking the user to mark a point on a line with each end of the line representing an opposing anchor statement. It can be modified to show the previous response, allowing the subject to directly indicate if the current condition is better or worse than the previous one. The goal of this study was to determine how well the modified VAS could measure user-perceived comfort as the exoskeleton control parameters were varied. To validate the survey, 14 healthy subjects walked in a pair of ankle exoskeletons with approximately ten distinct sets of control parameters tested in a prescribed order. Each set of control parameters was tested twice. After each trial, user-perceived comfort was measured using a two-question VAS survey. The repeatability coefficient was approximately 40 mm, similar to the total range of responses. The results were also inconsistent, with relative rankings between consecutive pairs of conditions matching for approximately 50% of comparisons. Thus, as tested, the VAS was not repeatable or consistent. It is possible that subject adaptation within the trial and over the course of the experiment may have impacted the results. Additional work is needed to develop a repeatable method to measure comfort and to determine how perceived comfort varies as subjects’ gain exoskeleton experience. 
    more » « less