More Like this

1. Differentially Private and Fair Deep Learning: A Lagrangian Dual Approach

   Tran, C.; Fioretto, F.; Van Hentenryck, P. (May 2021, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence)

   null (Ed.)

   A critical concern in data-driven decision making is to build models whose outcomes do not discriminate against some demographic groups, including gender, ethnicity, or age. To ensure non-discrimination in learning tasks, knowledge of the sensitive attributes is essential, while, in practice, these attributes may not be available due to legal and ethical requirements. To address this challenge, this paper studies a model that protects the privacy of the individuals’ sensitive information while also allowing it to learn non-discriminatory predictors. The method relies on the notion of differential privacy and the use of Lagrangian duality to design neural networks that can accommodate fairness constraints while guaranteeing the privacy of sensitive attributes. The paper analyses the tension between accuracy, privacy, and fairness and the experimental evaluation illustrates the benefits of the proposed model on several prediction tasks. 

   more » « less
2. Differentially Private Fair Learning

   Jagielski, M; Kearns, M; Mao, J; Oprea, A; Roth, A; Sharifi -Malvajerdi, A; Ullman, J (January 2019, International Conference on Machine Learining)

   Motivated by settings in which predictive models may be required to be non-discriminatory with respect to certain attributes (such as race), but even collecting the sensitive attribute may be forbidden or restricted, we initiate the study of fair learning under the constraint of differential privacy. Our first algorithm is a private implementation of the equalized odds post-processing approach of (Hardt et al., 2016). This algorithm is appealingly simple, but must be able to use protected group membership explicitly at test time, which can be viewed as a form of “disparate treatment”. Our second algorithm is a differentially private version of the oracle-efficient in-processing approach of (Agarwal et al., 2018) which is more complex but need not have access to protected group membership at test time. We identify new tradeoffs between fairness, accuracy, and privacy that emerge only when requiring all three properties, and show that these tradeoffs can be milder if group membership may be used at test time. We conclude with a brief experimental evaluation. 

   more » « less
3. Social media and volunteer rescue requests prediction with random forest and algorithm bias detection: a case of Hurricane Harvey

   https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/acde35  

   Mihunov, Volodymyr V.; Wang, Kejin; Wang, Zheye; Lam, Nina S. N.; Sun, Mingxuan (June 2023, Environmental Research Communications)

   Abstract AI fairness is tasked with evaluating and mitigating bias in algorithms that may discriminate towards protected groups. This paper examines if bias exists in AI algorithms used in disaster management and in what manner. We consider the 2017 Hurricane Harvey when flood victims in Houston resorted to social media to request for rescue. We evaluate a Random Forest regression model trained to predict Twitter rescue request rates from social-environmental data using three fairness criteria (independence, separation, and sufficiency). The Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), its four sub-indices, and four variables representing digital divide were considered sensitive attributes. The Random Forest regression model extracted seven significant predictors of rescue request rates, and from high to low importance they were percent of renter occupied housing units, percent of roads in flood zone, percent of flood zone area, percent of wetland cover, percent of herbaceous, forested and shrub cover, mean elevation, and percent of households with no computer or device. Partial Dependence plots of rescue request rates against each of the seven predictors show the non-linear nature of their relationships. Results of the fairness evaluation of the Random Forest model using the three criteria show no obvious biases for the nine sensitive attributes, except that a minor imperfect sufficiency was found with the SVI Housing and Transportation sub-index. Future AI modeling in disaster research could apply the same methodology used in this paper to evaluate fairness and help reduce unfair resource allocation and other social and geographical disparities. 

   more » « less
4. Privacy for All: Ensuring Fair and Equitable Privacy Protections

   Ekstrand, Michael D.; Joshaghani, Rezvan; Mehrpouyan, Hoda (January 2018, 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency)

   null (Ed.)

   In this position paper, we argue for applying recent research on ensuring sociotechnical systems are fair and non-discriminatory to the privacy protections those systems may provide. Privacy literature seldom considers whether a proposed privacy scheme protects all persons uniformly, irrespective of membership in protected classes or particular risk in the face of privacy failure. Just as algorithmic decision-making systems may have discriminatory outcomes even without explicit or deliberate discrimination, so also privacy regimes may disproportionately fail to protect vulnerable members of their target population, resulting in disparate impact with respect to the effectiveness of privacy protections.We propose a research agenda that will illuminate this issue, along with related issues in the intersection of fairness and privacy, and present case studies that show how the outcomes of this research may change existing privacy and fairness research. We believe it is important to ensure that technologies and policies intended to protect the users and subjects of information systems provide such protection in an equitable fashion. 

   more » « less
5. Unfairness Discovery and Prevention For Few-Shot Regression

   https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBK50248.2020.00029  

   Zhao, Chen; Chen, Feng (April 2021, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Knowledge Graph (ICKG))

   null (Ed.)

   We study fairness in supervised few-shot meta-learning models that are sensitive to discrimination (or bias) in historical data. A machine learning model trained based on biased data tends to make unfair predictions for users from minority groups. Although this problem has been studied before, existing methods mainly aim to detect and control the dependency effect of the protected variables (e.g. race, gender) on target prediction based on a large amount of training data. These approaches carry two major drawbacks that (1) lacking showing a global cause-effect visualization for all variables; (2) lacking generalization of both accuracy and fairness to unseen tasks. In this work, we first discover discrimination from data using a causal Bayesian knowledge graph which not only demonstrates the dependency of the protected variable on target but also indicates causal effects between all variables. Next, we develop a novel algorithm based on risk difference in order to quantify the discriminatory influence for each protected variable in the graph. Furthermore, to protect prediction from unfairness, a the fast-adapted bias-control approach in meta-learning is proposed, which efficiently mitigates statistical disparity for each task and it thus ensures independence of protected attributes on predictions based on biased and few-shot data samples. Distinct from existing meta-learning models, group unfairness of tasks are efficiently reduced by leveraging the mean difference between (un)protected groups for regression problems. Through extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world data sets, we demonstrate that our proposed unfairness discovery and prevention approaches efficiently detect discrimination and mitigate biases on model output as well as generalize both accuracy and fairness to unseen tasks with a limited amount of training samples. 

   more » « less