skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: The Cloud-resolving model Radar SIMulator (CR-SIM) Version 3.3: description and applications of a virtual observatory
Abstract. Ground-based observatories use multisensor observations to characterize cloud and precipitation properties. One of the challenges is how to designstrategies to best use these observations to understand these properties and evaluate weather and climate models. This paper introduces the Cloud-resolving model Radar SIMulator (CR-SIM), which uses output from high-resolution cloud-resolving models (CRMs) to emulate multiwavelength,zenith-pointing, and scanning radar observables and multisensor (radar and lidar) products. CR-SIM allows for direct comparison between an atmosphericmodel simulation and remote-sensing products using a forward-modeling framework consistent with the microphysical assumptions used in the atmosphericmodel. CR-SIM has the flexibility to easily incorporate additional microphysical modules, such as microphysical schemes and scattering calculations,and expand the applications to simulate multisensor retrieval products. In this paper, we present several applications of CR-SIM for evaluating therepresentativeness of cloud microphysics and dynamics in a CRM, quantifying uncertainties in radar–lidar integrated cloud products and multi-Dopplerwind retrievals, and optimizing radar sampling strategy using observing system simulation experiments. These applications demonstrate CR-SIM as a virtual observatory operator on high-resolution model output for a consistent comparison between model results and observations to aidinterpretation of the differences and improve understanding of the representativeness errors due to the sampling limitations of the ground-basedmeasurements. CR-SIM is licensed under the GNU GPL package and both the software and the user guide are publicly available to the scientificcommunity.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1841215
PAR ID:
10215118
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Geoscientific Model Development
Volume:
13
Issue:
4
ISSN:
1991-9603
Page Range / eLocation ID:
1975 to 1998
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; (, Earth and Space Science)
    Abstract Understanding distributions of cloud thermodynamic phases is important for accurately representing cloud radiative effects and cloud feedback in a changing climate. Satellite‐based cloud phase data have been frequently used to compare with climate models, yet few studies validated them against in situ observations at a near‐global scale. This study aims to validate three satellite‐based cloud phase products using a compositive in situ airborne data set developed from 11 flight campaigns. Latitudinal‐altitudinal cross sections of cloud phase occurrence frequencies are examined. The Cloud–Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) show the most similar vertical profiles of ice phase frequencies compared with in situ observations. The CloudSat data overestimate mixed‐phase frequencies up to 15 km but provide better sampling through cloud layers than lidar data. The DARDAR (raDAR/liDAR) data show a sharp transition between ice and liquid phase and overestimate ice phase frequency at most altitudes and latitudes. The satellite data are further evaluated for various latitudes, longitudes, and seasons, which show higher ice phase frequency in the extratropics in their respective wintertime and smaller impacts from longitudinal variations. The Southern Ocean shows a thicker mixing region where liquid and ice phases have similar frequencies compared with tropics and Northern Hemisphere (NH) extratropics. Two comparison methods with different spatiotemporal windows show similar results, which demonstrates the statistical robustness of these comparisons. Overall, this study develops a near global‐scale in situ observational data set to assess the accuracy of satellite‐based cloud phase products and investigates the key factors affecting the distributions of cloud phases. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres)
    Abstract In this study, we conduct sensitivity experiments with the Community Atmosphere Model version 5 to understand the impact of representing heterogeneous distribution between cloud liquid and ice on the phase partitioning in mixed‐phase clouds through different perturbations on the Wegener‐Bergeron‐Findeisen (WBF) process. In two experiments, perturbation factors that are based on assumptions of pocket structure and the partial homogeneous cloud volume derived from the High‐performance Instrumented Airborne Platform for Environmental Research (HIAPER) Pole‐to‐Pole Observation (HIPPO) campaign are utilized. Alternately, a mass‐weighted assumption is used in the calculation of WBF process to mimic the appearance of unsaturated area in mixed‐phase clouds as the result of heterogeneous distribution. Model experiments are tested in both single column and weather forecast modes and evaluated against data from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program's Mixed‐Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment (M‐PACE) field campaign and long‐term ground‐based multisensor measurements. Model results indicate that perturbations on the WBF process can significantly modify simulated microphysical properties of Arctic mixed‐phase clouds. The improvement of simulated cloud water phase partitioning tends to be linearly proportional to the perturbation magnitude that is applied in the three different sensitivity experiments. Cloud macrophysical properties such as cloud fraction and frequency of occurrence of low‐level mixed‐phase clouds are less sensitive to the perturbation magnitude than cloud microphysical properties. Moreover, this study indicates that heterogeneous distribution between cloud hydrometeors should be treated consistently for all cloud microphysical processes. The model vertical resolution is also important for liquid water maintenance in mixed‐phase clouds. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; (, Geoscientific Model Development)
    Abstract. Satellite cloud observations have become an indispensable tool for evaluatinggeneral circulation models (GCMs). To facilitate the satellite and GCMcomparisons, the CFMIP (Cloud Feedback Model Inter-comparison Project)Observation Simulator Package (COSP) has been developed and is nowincreasingly used in GCM evaluations. Real-world clouds and precipitation canhave significant sub-grid variations, which, however, are often ignored oroversimplified in the COSP simulation. In this study, we use COSP cloudsimulations from the Super-Parameterized Community Atmosphere Model (SPCAM5)and satellite observations from the Moderate Resolution ImagingSpectroradiometer (MODIS) and CloudSat to demonstrate the importance ofconsidering the sub-grid variability of cloud and precipitation when usingthe COSP to evaluate GCM simulations. We carry out two sensitivity tests:SPCAM5 COSP and SPCAM5-Homogeneous COSP. In the SPCAM5 COSP run, the sub-gridcloud and precipitation properties from the embeddedcloud-resolving model (CRM) of SPCAM5 are used to drive the COSP simulation, while inthe SPCAM5-Homogeneous COSP run only grid-mean cloud and precipitationproperties (i.e., no sub-grid variations) are given to the COSP. We find thatthe warm rain signatures in the SPCAM5 COSP run agree with the MODIS andCloudSat observations quite well. In contrast, the SPCAM5-Homogeneous COSPrun which ignores the sub-grid cloud variations substantially overestimatesthe radar reflectivity and probability of precipitation compared to thesatellite observations, as well as the results from the SPCAM5 COSP run. Thesignificant differences between the two COSP runs demonstrate that it isimportant to take into account the sub-grid variations of cloud andprecipitation when using COSP to evaluate the GCM to avoid confusing andmisleading results. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics)
    Abstract. A comparison of polar stratospheric cloud (PSC) occurrence from 2006 to2010 is presented, as observed from the ground-based lidar station at McMurdo(Antarctica) and by the satellite-borne CALIOP lidar (Cloud-Aerosol Lidarwith Orthogonal Polarization) measuring over McMurdo. McMurdo (Antarctica) isone of the primary lidar stations for aerosol measurements of the NDACC (Network forDetection of Atmospheric Climate Change). The ground-based observations havebeen classified with an algorithm derived from the recent v2 detection andclassification scheme, used to classify PSCs observed by CALIOP. A statistical approach has been used to compare ground-based and satellite-based observations, since point-to-point comparison is often troublesome dueto the intrinsic differences in the observation geometries and the imperfectoverlap of the observed areas. A comparison of space-borne lidar observations and a selection of simulationsobtained from chemistry–climate models (CCMs) has been made by using a series ofquantitative diagnostics based on the statistical occurrence of different PSCtypes. The distribution of PSCs over Antarctica, calculated by severalCCMVal-2 and CCMI chemistry–climate models has been compared with the PSCcoverage observed by the satellite-borne CALIOP lidar. The use of severaldiagnostic tools, including the temperature dependence of the PSCoccurrences, evidences the merits and flaws of the different models. Thediagnostic methods have been defined to overcome (at least partially) thepossible differences due to the resolution of the models and to identifydifferences due to microphysics (e.g., the dependence of PSC occurrence onT−TNAT). A significant temperature bias of most models has been observed, as well as alimited ability to reproduce the longitudinal variations in PSC occurrencesobserved by CALIOP. In particular, a strong temperature bias has been observedin CCMVal-2 models with a strong impact on PSC formation. The WACCM-CCMI(Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model – Chemistry-Climate ModelInitiative) model compares rather well with the CALIOP observations, althougha temperature bias is still present. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques)
    Abstract. Clouds warm the surface in the longwave (LW), and this warming effect can be quantified through the surface LW cloud radiativeeffect (CRE). The global surface LW CRE has been estimated over more than2 decades using space-based radiometers (2000–2021) and over the 5-year period ending in 2011 using the combination of radar, lidar and space-basedradiometers. Previous work comparing these two types of retrievals has shown that the radiometer-based cloud amount has some bias over icy surfaces. Here we propose new estimates of the global surface LW CRE from space-based lidarobservations over the 2008–2020 time period. We show from 1D atmosphericcolumn radiative transfer calculations that surface LW CRE linearly decreases with increasing cloud altitude. These computations allow us toestablish simple parameterizations between surface LW CRE and five cloud properties that are well observed by the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and InfraredPathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) space-based lidar: opaque cloud cover and altitude and thin cloud cover, altitude, and emissivity. We evaluate this new surface LWCRE–LIDAR product by comparing it to existingsatellite-derived products globally on instantaneous collocated data atfootprint scale and on global averages as well as to ground-based observations at specific locations. This evaluation shows good correlationsbetween this new product and other datasets. Our estimate appears to be animprovement over others as it appropriately captures the annual variabilityof the surface LW CRE over bright polar surfaces and it provides a datasetmore than 13 years long. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email