More Like this

1. Extracting Interactions between Flying Bat Pairs Using Model-Free Methods

   https://doi.org/10.3390/e21010042  

   Roy, Subhradeep ; Howes, Kayla ; Müller, Rolf ; Butail, Sachit ; Abaid, Nicole ( January 2019 , Entropy)

   Social animals exhibit collective behavior whereby they negotiate to reach an agreement, such as the coordination of group motion. Bats are unique among most social animals, since they use active sensory echolocation by emitting ultrasonic waves and sensing echoes to navigate. Bats’ use of active sensing may result in acoustic interference from peers, driving different behavior when they fly together rather than alone. The present study explores quantitative methods that can be used to understand whether bats flying in pairs move independently of each other or interact. The study used field data from bats in flight and is based on the assumption that interactions between two bats are evidenced in their flight patterns. To quantify pairwise interaction, we defined the strength of coupling using model-free methods from dynamical systems and information theory. We used a control condition to eliminate similarities in flight path due to environmental geometry. Our research question is whether these data-driven methods identify directed coupling between bats from their flight paths and, if so, whether the results are consistent between methods. Results demonstrate evidence of information exchange between flying bat pairs, and, in particular, we find significant evidence of rear-to-front coupling in bats’ turning behavior when they fly in the absence of obstacles. 

   more » « less
2. Neural Response Selectivity to Natural Sounds in the Bat Midbrain

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.11.047  

   Salles, A. ; Park, S. ; Sundar, H. ; Macias, S. ; Elhilali, M. ; Moss, C.F. ( May 2020 , Neuroscience)

   Little is known about the neural mechanisms that mediate differential action–selection responses to communication and echolocation calls in bats. For example, in the big brown bat, frequency modulated (FM) food-claiming communication calls closely resemble FM echolocation calls, which guide social and orienting behaviors, respectively. Using advanced signal processing methods, we identified fine differences in temporal structure of these natural sounds that appear key to auditory discrimination and behavioral decisions. We recorded extracellular potentials from single neurons in the midbrain inferior colliculus (IC) of passively listening animals, and compared responses to playbacks of acoustic signals used by bats for social communication and echolocation. We combined information obtained from spike number and spike triggered averages (STA) to reveal a robust classification of neuron selectivity for communication or echolocation calls. These data highlight the importance of temporal acoustic structure for differentiating echolocation and food-claiming social calls and point to general mechanisms of natural sound processing across species. 

   more » « less
3. Auditory Communication Processing in Bats: What We Know and Where to Go

   https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bne0000308  

   Salles, A. ; Bohn, K. ; Moss, C.F. ( June 2019 , Behavioral neuroscience)

   Bats are the second largest mammalian order, with over 1,300 species. These animals show diverse behaviors, diets, and habitats. Most bats produce ultrasonic vocalizations and perceive their environment by processing information carried by returning echoes of their calls. Echolocation is achieved through a sophisticated audio-vocal system that allows bats to emit and detect frequencies that can range from ten to hundreds of kilohertz. In addition, most bat species are gregarious, and produce social communication calls that vary in complexity, form, and function across species. In this article, we (a) highlight the value of bats as model species for research on social communication, (b) review behavioral and neurophysiological studies of bat acoustic communication signal production and processing, and (c) discuss important directions for future research in this field. We propose that comparative studies of bat acoustic communication can provide new insights into sound processing and vocal learning across the animal kingdom. 

   more » « less
4. Sound evoked Fos-like immunoreactivity in the big brown bat

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibneur.2022.02.005  

   Salles, A. ( January 2022 , IBRO neuroscience reports)

   Most bat species have highly developed audio-vocal systems, which allow them to adjust the features of echolocation calls that are optimized for different sonar tasks, such as detecting, localizing, discriminating and tracking targets. Furthermore, bats can also produce a wide array of social calls to communicate with conspecifics. The acoustic properties of some social calls differ only subtly from echolocation calls, yet bats have the ability to distinguish them and reliably produce appropriate behavioral responses. Little is known about the underlying neural processes that enable the correct classification of bat social communication sounds. One approach to this question is to identify the brain regions that are involved in the processing of sounds that carry behavioral relevance. Here, we present preliminary data on neuronal activation, as measured by c-fos expression, in big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) exposed to either social calls, echolocation calls or kept in silence. We focused our investigation on five relevant brain areas; three within the canonical auditory pathway (auditory cortex, inferior colliculus and medial geniculate body) and two that are involved in the processing of emotive stimulus content (amygdala and nucleus accumbens). In this manuscript we report c-fos staining of the areas of interest after exposure to conspecific calls. We discuss future work designed to overcome experimental limitations and explore whether c-fos staining reveals anatomical segregation of neurons activated by echolocation and social call call categories. 

   more » « less
5. Natural echolocation sequences evoke echo-delay selectivity in the auditory midbrain of the FM bat, Eptesicus fuscus

   https://doi.org/doi:10.1152/jn.00160.2018.  

   Macias, S. ; Luo, J. ; Moss, C.F. ( June 2018 , Journal of neurophysiology)

   Echolocating bats must process temporal streams of sonar sounds to represent objects along the range axis. Neuronal echo-delay tuning, the putative mechanism of sonar ranging, has been characterized in the inferior colliculus (IC) of the mustached bat, an insectivorous species that produces echolocation calls consisting of constant frequency and frequency modulated (FM) components, but not in species that use FM signals alone. This raises questions about the mechanisms that give rise to echo-delay tuning in insectivorous bats that use different signal designs. To investigate whether stimulus context may account for species differences in echo-delay selectivity, we characterized single-unit responses in the IC of awake passively listening FM bats, Eptesicus fuscus, to broadcasts of natural sonar call-echo sequences, which contained dynamic changes in signal duration, interval, spectrotemporal structure, and echo-delay. In E. fuscus, neural selectivity to call-echo delay emerges in a population of IC neurons when stimulated with call-echo pairs presented at intervals mimicking those in a natural sonar sequence. To determine whether echo-delay selectivity also depends on the spectrotemporal features of individual sounds within natural sonar sequences, we studied responses to computer-generated echolocation signals that controlled for call interval, duration, bandwidth, sweep rate, and echo-delay. A subpopulation of IC neurons responded selectively to the combination of the spectrotemporal structure of natural call-echo pairs and their temporal patterning within a dynamic sonar sequence. These new findings suggest that the FM bat’s fine control over biosonar signal parameters may modulate IC neuronal selectivity to the dimension of echo-delay. 

   more » « less