The design-based research approach was used to develop and study a novel capstone course: Mathematical Reasoning and Proving for Secondary Teachers. The course aimed to enhance prospective secondary teachers’ (PSTs) content and pedagogical knowledge by emphasizing reasoning and proving as an overarching approach for teaching mathematics at all levels. The course focused on four proof-themes: quantified statements, conditional statements, direct proof and indirect reasoning. The PSTs strengthened their own knowledge of these themes, and then developed and taught in local schools a lesson incorporating the proof-theme within an ongoing mathematical topic. Analysis of the first-year data shows enhancements of PSTs’ content and pedagogical knowledge specific to proving.
more »
« less
Secondary Prospective Teachers’ Strategies to Determine Equivalence of Conditional Statements
Future mathematics teachers must be able to interpret a wide range of mathematical statements, in particular conditional statements. Literature shows that even when students are familiar with conditional statements and equivalence to the contrapositive, identifying other equivalent and non-equivalent forms can be challenging. As a part of a larger grant to enhance and study prospective secondary teachers’ (PSTs’) mathematical knowledge for teaching proof, we analyzed data from 26 PSTs working on a task that required rewriting a conditional statement in several different forms and then determining those that were equivalent to the original statement. We identified three key strategies used to make sense of the various forms of conditional statements and to identify equivalent and non-equivalent forms: meaning making, comparing truth-values and comparing to known syntactic forms. The PSTs relied both on semantic meaning of the statements and on their formal logical knowledge to make their judgments.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1711163
- PAR ID:
- 10223827
- Editor(s):
- Karunakaran, S. S.; Reed, Z.; Higgins, A.
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education
- ISSN:
- 2474-9346
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 62 – 69
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
We use a curriculum design framework to analyze how prospective secondary teachers (PSTs) designed and implemented in local schools, lessons that integrate ongoing mathematical topics with one of the four proof themes addressed in the capstone course Mathematical Reasoning and Proving for Secondary Teachers. In this paper we focus on lessons developed around the conditional statements proof theme. We examine the ways in which PSTs integrated conditional statements in their lesson plans, how these lessons were implemented in classrooms, and the challenges PSTs encountered in these processes. Our results suggest that even when PSTs designed rich lesson plans, they often struggled to adjust their language to the students’ level and to maintain the cognitive demand of the tasks. We conclude by discussing possible supports for PSTs’ learning in these areas.more » « less
-
For reasoning and proving to become a reality in mathematics classrooms, pre-service teachers (PSTs) must develop knowledge and skills for creating lessons that engage students in proof-related activities. Supporting PSTs in this process was among the goals of a capstone course: Mathematical Reasoning and Proving for Secondary Teachers. During the course, the PSTs designed and implemented in local schools four lessons that integrated within the regular secondary curriculum one of the four proof themes discussed in the course: quantification and the role of examples in proving, conditional statements, direct proof and argument evaluation, and indirect reasoning. In this paper we report on the analysis of 60 PSTs’ lesson plans in terms of opportunities for students to learn about the proof themes, pedagogical features of the lessons and cognitive demand of the proof-related tasks.more » « less
-
The manuscript shares findings from a study engaging secondary mathematics preservice teachers using Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbots to design mathematics lesson plans. Phenomenology was employed to investigate how six secondary preservice teachers used AI chatbots and navigated this new resource compared to their knowledge and experience in developing culturally responsive mathematics lesson plans that included mathematics and social justice goals. Our data analysis revealed that PSTs’ confidence in their Mathematical Content Knowledge and Pedagogical Content Knowledge allowed them to be critical of using AI-generated lesson plans. This finding contrasted with previous research on elementary education preservice teachers who gave away their decision-making agency to AI chatbots, especially about mathematics. The data suggests that the secondary PSTs had confidence in their Mathematical and Pedagogical Content Knowledge, making them more critical of the AI-generated lesson plans. The findings also indicate that AI tools can help teachers learn about Technological Pedagogical Knowledge (TPK). Overall, the data stressed the need to support PSTs in using AI chatbots critically. The implications of this study provide possible ways to help PSTs overcome their overconfidence in AI chatbots and imply that more professional development tools and programs must be constructed to help inservice teachers use AI tools.more » « less
-
Abstract Mathematics teacher education programs in the United States are charged with preparing prospective secondary teachers (PSTs) to teach reasoning and proving across grade levels and mathematical topics. Although most programs require a course on proof, PSTs often perceive it as disconnected from their future classroom practice. Our design research project developed a capstone courseMathematical Reasoning and Proving for Secondary Teachersand systematically studied its effect on PSTs’ content and pedagogical knowledge specific to proof. This paper focuses on one course module—Quantification and the Role of Examples in Proving,a topic which poses persistent difficulties to students and teachers alike. The analysis suggests that after the course, PSTs’ content and pedagogical knowledge of the role of examples in proving increased. We provide evidence from multiple data sources: pre-and post-questionnaires, PSTs’ responses to the in-class activities, their lesson plans, reflections on lesson enactment, and self-report. We discuss design principles that supported PSTs’ learning and their applicability beyond the study context.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

