An official website of the United States government
Phylogenetic networks extend the phylogenetic tree structure and allow for modeling vertical and horizontal evolution in a single framework. Statistical inference of phylogenetic networks is prohibitive and currently limited to small networks. An approach that could significantly improve phylogenetic network space exploration is based on first inferring an evolutionary tree of the species under consideration, and then augmenting the tree into a network by adding a set of "horizontal" edges to better fit the data. In this paper, we study the performance of such an approach on networks generated under a birth-hybridization model and explore its feasibility as an alternative to approaches that search the phylogenetic network space directly (without relying on a fixed underlying tree). We find that the concatenation method does poorly at obtaining a "backbone" tree that could be augmented into the correct network, whereas the popular species tree inference method ASTRAL does significantly better at such a task. We then evaluated the tree-to-network augmentation phase under the minimizing deep coalescence and pseudo-likelihood criteria. We find that even though this is a much faster approach than the direct search of the network space, the accuracy is much poorer, even when the backbone tree is a good starting tree. Our results show that tree-based inference of phylogenetic networks could yield very poor results. As exploration of the network space directly in search of maximum likelihood estimates or a representative sample of the posterior is very expensive, significant improvements to the computational complexity of phylogenetic network inference are imperative if analyses of large data sets are to be performed. We show that a recently developed divide-and-conquer approach significantly outperforms tree-based inference in terms of accuracy, albeit still at a higher computational cost.
more »
« less
Maximum Covering Subtrees for Phylogenetic Networks
Tree-based phylogenetic networks, which may be roughly defined as leaf-labeled networks built by adding arcs only between the original tree edges, have elegant properties for modeling evolutionary histories. We answer an open question of Francis, Semple, and Steel about the complexity of determining how far a phylogenetic network is from being tree-based, including non-binary phylogenetic networks. We show that finding a phylogenetic tree covering the maximum number of nodes in a phylogenetic network can be computed in polynomial time via an encoding into a minimum-cost flow problem.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10224711
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
- ISSN:
- 1545-5963
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1 to 1
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
The reconstruction of phylogenetic networks is an important but challenging problem in phylogenetics and genome evolution, as the space of phylogenetic networks is vast and cannot be sampled well. One approach to the problem is to solve the minimum phylogenetic network problem, in which phylogenetic trees are first inferred, and then the smallest phylogenetic network that displays all the trees is computed. The approach takes advantage of the fact that the theory of phylogenetic trees is mature, and there are excellent tools available for inferring phylogenetic trees from a large number of biomolecular sequences. A tree–child network is a phylogenetic network satisfying the condition that every nonleaf node has at least one child that is of indegree one. Here, we develop a new method that infers the minimum tree–child network by aligning lineage taxon strings in the phylogenetic trees. This algorithmic innovation enables us to get around the limitations of the existing programs for phylogenetic network inference. Our new program, named ALTS, is fast enough to infer a tree–child network with a large number of reticulations for a set of up to 50 phylogenetic trees with 50 taxa that have only trivial common clusters in about a quarter of an hour on average.more » « less
-
Phylogenetic network is an evolutionary model that uses a rooted directed acyclic graph (instead of a tree) to model an evolutionary history of species in which reticulate events (e.g., hybrid speciation or horizontal gene transfer) occurred. Tree-child network is a kind of phylogenetic network with structural constraints. Existing approaches for tree-child network reconstruction can be slow for large data. In this study, we present several computational approaches for bounding from below the number of reticulations in a tree-child network that displays a given set of rooted binary phylogenetic trees. In addition, we also present some theoretical results on bounding from above the number of reticulations. Through simulation, we demonstrate that the new lower bounds on the reticulation number for tree-child networks can practically be computed for large tree data. The bounds can provide estimates of reticulation for relatively large data.more » « less
-
Reticulations in a phylogenetic network represent processes such as gene flow, admixture, recombination and hybrid speciation. Extending definitions from the tree setting, an anomalous network is one in which some unrooted tree topology displayed in the network appears in gene trees with a lower frequency than a tree not displayed in the network. We investigate anomalous networks under the Network Multispecies Coalescent Model with possible correlated inheritance at reticulations. Focusing on subsets of 4 taxa, we describe a new algorithm to calculate quartet concordance factors on networks of any level, faster than previous algorithms because of its focus on 4 taxa. We then study topological properties required for a 4-taxon network to be anomalous, uncovering the key role of 32-cycles: cycles of 3 edges parent to a sister group of 2 taxa. Under the model of common inheritance, that is, when each gene tree coalesces within a species tree displayed in the network, we prove that 4-taxon networks are never anomalous. Under independent and various levels of correlated inheritance, we use simulations under realistic parameters to quantify the prevalence of anomalous 4-taxon networks, finding that truly anomalous networks are rare. At the same time, however, we find a significant fraction of networks close enough to the anomaly zone to appear anomalous, when considering the quartet concordance factors observed from a few hundred genes. These apparent anomalies may challenge network inference methods.more » « less
-
Abstract MotivationThe abundance of gene flow in the Tree of Life challenges the notion that evolution can be represented with a fully bifurcating process which cannot capture important biological realities like hybridization, introgression, or horizontal gene transfer. Coalescent-based network methods are increasingly popular, yet not scalable for big data, because they need to perform a heuristic search in the space of networks as well as numerical optimization that can be NP-hard. Here, we introduce a novel method to reconstruct phylogenetic networks based on algebraic invariants. While there is a long tradition of using algebraic invariants in phylogenetics, our work is the first to define phylogenetic invariants on concordance factors (frequencies of four-taxon splits in the input gene trees) to identify level-1 phylogenetic networks under the multispecies coalescent model. ResultsOur novel hybrid detection methodology is optimization-free as it only requires the evaluation of polynomial equations, and as such, it bypasses the traversal of network space, yielding a computational speed at least 10 times faster than the fastest-to-date network methods. We illustrate our method’s performance on simulated and real data from the genus Canis. Availability and implementationWe present an open-source publicly available Julia package PhyloDiamond.jl available at https://github.com/solislemuslab/PhyloDiamond.jl with broad applicability within the evolutionary community.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1109/TCBB.2020.3040910
