An official website of the United States government
Sublithospheric diamonds and the inclusions they may carry crystallize in the asthenosphere, transition zone, or uppermost lower mantle (from 300 to ∼800 km), and are the deepest minerals so far recognized to form by plate tectonics. These diamonds are distinctive in their deformation features, low nitrogen content, and inclusions of these major mantle minerals: majoritic garnet, clinopyroxene, ringwoodite, CaSi perovskite, ferropericlase, and bridgmanite or their retrograde equivalents. The stable isotopic compositions of elements within these diamonds (δ11B, δ13C, δ15N) and their inclusions (δ18O, δ56Fe) are typically well outside normal mantle ranges, showing that these elements were either organic (C) or modified by seawater alteration (B, O, Fe) at relatively low temperatures. Metamorphic minerals in cold slabs are effective hosts that transport C as CO3 and H as H2O, OH, or CH4 below the island arc and mantle wedge. Warming of the slab generates carbonatitic melts, supercritical aqueous fluids, or metallic liquids, forming three types of sublithospheric diamonds. Diamond crystallization occurs by movement and reduction of mobile fluids as they pass through host mantle via fractures—a process that creates chemical heterogeneity and may promote deep focus earthquakes. Geobarometry of majoritic garnet inclusions and diamond ages suggest upward transport, perhaps to the base of mantle lithosphere. From there, diamonds are carried to Earth's surface by eruptions of kimberlite magma. Mineral assemblages in sublithospheric diamonds directly trace Earth's deep volatile cycle, demonstrating how the hydrosphere of a rocky planet can connect to its solid interior.▪Sublithospheric diamonds from the deep upper mantle, transition zone, and lower mantle host Earth's deepest obtainable mineral samples.▪Low-temperature seawater alteration of the ocean floor captures organic and inorganic carbon at the surface eventually to become some of the most precious gem diamonds.▪Subduction transports fluids in metamorphic minerals to great depth. Fluids released by slab heating migrate, react with host mantle to induce diamond crystallization, and may trigger earthquakes.▪Sublithospheric diamonds are powerful tracers of subduction—a plate tectonic process that deeply recycles part of Earth's planetary volatile budget.
more »
« less
Helium in diamonds unravels over a billion years of craton metasomatism
Abstract Chemical events involving deep carbon- and water-rich fluids impact the continental lithosphere over its history. Diamonds are a by-product of such episodic fluid infiltrations, and entrapment of these fluids as microinclusions in lithospheric diamonds provide unique opportunities to investigate their nature. However, until now, direct constraints on the timing of such events have not been available. Here we report three alteration events in the southwest Kaapvaal lithosphere using U-Th-He geochronology of fluid-bearing diamonds, and constrain the upper limit of He diffusivity (toD ≈ 1.8 × 10−19cm2s−1), thus providing a means to directly place both upper and lower age limits on these alteration episodes. The youngest, during the Cretaceous, involved highly saline fluids, indicating a relationship with late-Mesozoic kimberlite eruptions. Remnants of two preceding events, by a Paleozoic silicic fluid and a Proterozoic carbonatitic fluid, are also encapsulated in Kaapvaal diamonds and are likely coeval with major surface tectonic events (e.g. the Damara and Namaqua–Natal orogenies).
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10227416
- Publisher / Repository:
- Nature Publishing Group
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Nature Communications
- Volume:
- 12
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 2041-1723
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
In the current plate tectonic regime, thermal modeling, petrology, and seismology show that subsurface portions of cold slabs carry some of their volatiles into the deep upper mantle, mantle transition zone, and uppermost lower mantle avoiding the devolatilization occurring with normal arc and wedge subduction. Slab crustal remnants at these depths can melt by intersecting their carbonated solidus whereas slab mantle remnants can devolatilize by warming and metamorphosing to ‘dryer’ mineral assemblages. Since fluid release and earthquake production (“dehydration embrittlement”) operates down to ~300 km depths in all subduction zones, we propose, that deep-focus earthquakes trace the places of fluid release at deeper levels (350 to 750 km). Fluids in faults related to earthquake generation will become diamond-forming as they react with mantle rocks along the fault walls. Diamonds thus formed will record deformation produced by mantle convection and slab buckling during mantle storage. Lithospheric diamonds, stored in static ancient continental keels, lack the connection to this type of geodynamic regime that is evident for sublithospheric diamonds. However, a comparison between the two diamond types suggests a geologic model for lithospheric diamond formation in the ancient past. Lithospheric diamonds and sublithospheric diamonds both contain evidence for the recycling of sediments or surficial rocks that have equilibrated at low temperatures with seawater. The known way to inject these materials into diamond-forming regions is slab subduction. Hence both diamond types may have formed by variants of this same process that differ in depth and style over geologic time. Lithospheric diamonds are different from sublithospheric diamonds in critical ways: higher average N content, ages extending into the Paleoarchean, inclusion assemblages indicating formation at lower pressure, and lack of ubiquitous deformation features. Nitrogen content is the key to relating lithospheric diamonds to the subducting slab. Nitrogen occurs in clays and sediments at the slab surface or uppermost crust. Regardless of whether the slab is hot or cold during subduction, nitrogen will be removed into a mantle wedge if one exists. Additionally, diamonds will not survive in the melts/fluids generated in the wedge under oxidizing conditions. For sublithospheric diamonds, their low to non-existent nitrogen content occurs because they are derived from slab fluids/melts once nitrogen has been largely removed or from rocks deeper in the slab where nitrogen is scarce. The much higher nitrogen in lithospheric diamonds suggests that they formed from fluids/melts derived near the slab surface that contained N. In the Archean, such slabs must have subducted close to the nascent mantle keel with no mantle wedge so the fluids could be directly reduced by the mantle keel. We propose a gradual temporal change from shallow, keel-adjacent, mantle-wedge-poor subduction that produced lithospheric diamonds starting in the Paleoarchean to wedge-avoiding, cold and deep subduction that produced sublithospheric diamonds in the Paleozoic. This temporal change is consistent with many geologic features: an early stagnant lid and a buoyant Archean oceanic lithosphere; the slab-imbrication, advective thickening, and diamond-richness of portions of mantle keels; and anomalously diamond-rich ancient eclogites.more » « less
-
Abstract The nature and cause of deep earthquakes remain enduring unknowns in the field of seismology. We present new models of thermal structures of subducted slabs traced to mantle transition zone depths that permit a detailed comparison between slab pressure/temperature (P/T) paths and hydrated/carbonated mineral phase relations. We find a remarkable correlation between slabs capable of transporting water to transition zone depths in dense hydrous magnesium silicates with slabs that produce seismicity below ∼300‐km depth, primarily between 500 and 700 km. This depth range also coincides with theP/Tconditions at which oceanic crustal lithologies in cold slabs are predicted to intersect the carbonate‐bearing basalt solidus to produce carbonatitic melts. Both forms of fluid evolution are well represented by sublithospheric diamonds whose inclusions record the existence of melts, fluids, or supercritical liquids derived from hydrated or carbonate‐bearing slabs at depths (∼300–700 km) generally coincident with deep‐focus earthquakes. We propose that the hydrous and carbonated fluids released from subducted slabs at these depths lead to fluid‐triggered seismicity, fluid migration, diamond precipitation, and inclusion crystallization. Deep focus earthquake hypocenters could track the general region of deep fluid release, migration, and diamond formation in the mantle. The thermal modeling of slabs in the mantle and the correlation between sublithospheric diamonds, deep focus earthquakes, and slabs at depth demonstrate a deep subduction pathway to the mantle transition zone for carbon and volatiles that bypasses shallower decarbonation and dehydration processes.more » « less
-
Abstract Subduction related to the ancient supercontinent cycle is poorly constrained by mantle samples. Sublithospheric diamond crystallization records the release of melts from subducting oceanic lithosphere at 300–700 km depths1,2and is especially suited to tracking the timing and effects of deep mantle processes on supercontinents. Here we show that four isotope systems (Rb–Sr, Sm–Nd, U–Pb and Re–Os) applied to Fe-sulfide and CaSiO3inclusions within 13 sublithospheric diamonds from Juína (Brazil) and Kankan (Guinea) give broadly overlapping crystallization ages from around 450 to 650 million years ago. The intracratonic location of the diamond deposits on Gondwana and the ages, initial isotopic ratios, and trace element content of the inclusions indicate formation from a peri-Gondwanan subduction system. Preservation of these Neoproterozoic–Palaeozoic sublithospheric diamonds beneath Gondwana until its Cretaceous breakup, coupled with majorite geobarometry3,4, suggests that they accreted to and were retained in the lithospheric keel for more than 300 Myr during supercontinent migration. We propose that this process of lithosphere growth—with diamonds attached to the supercontinent keel by the diapiric uprise of depleted buoyant material and pieces of slab crust—could have enhanced supercontinent stability.more » « less
-
Abstract Young mafic lavas from the East African Western Rift record melting of subcontinental lithospheric mantle that was metasomatically modified by multiple tectonic events. We report new isotope data from monogenetic cinder cones near Bufumbira, Uganda, in the Virunga Volcanic Field:87Sr/86Sr = 0.7059–0.7079,εNd = −6.5 to −1.3,εHf = −6.3 to +0.9,208Pb/204Pb = 40.1–40.7,207Pb/204Pb = 15.68–15.75, and206Pb/204Pb = 19.27–19.45. Olivine phenocrysts from the Bufumbira lavas have3He/4He = 6.0–7.4RA. The isotopic data, in conjunction with major and trace element systematics, indicate that primitive Bufumbira magmas are derived from two different metasomatized lithospheric source domains. Melts generated by lower degrees of melting record greater contributions from ∼1 to 2 Ga isotopically enriched garnet‐amphibole‐phlogopite pyroxenite veins within the lithosphere. As melting progresses, these vein melts become increasingly diluted by melts that originate near the lithosphere/asthenosphere boundary, shifting the isotopic compositions toward the common lithospheric mantle (CLM) proposed by Furman and Graham (1999,https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-4937(99)00031-6). This ∼450–500 Ma source domain appears to underlie all Western Rift volcanic provinces and is characterized by87Sr/86Sr ∼ 0.705,εNd∼ 0,εHf∼ +1 to +3,206Pb/204Pb ∼ 19.0–19.2,208Pb/204Pb ∼ 39.7, and3He/4He ∼ 7RA. Basal portions of the dense subcontinental lithospheric mantle may become gravitationally unstable and founder into underlying warmer asthenosphere, exposing surfaces where melting of locally heterogeneous veins produces small‐volume, alkaline mafic melts. Mafic lavas from all Western Rift volcanic provinces record mixing between the CLM and locally variable metasomatized source domains, suggesting this style of melt generation is fundamental to the development of magma‐poor rifts.more » « less
