An official website of the United States government
Abstract Ten bow echo events were simulated using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model with 3- and 1-km horizontal grid spacing with both the Morrison and Thompson microphysics schemes to determine the impact of refined grid spacing on this often poorly simulated mode of convection. Simulated and observed composite reflectivities were used to classify convective mode. Skill scores were computed to quantify model performance at predicting all modes, and a new bow echo score was created to evaluate specifically the accuracy of bow echo forecasts. The full morphology score for runs using the Thompson scheme was noticeably improved by refined grid spacing, while the skill of Morrison runs did not change appreciably. However, bow echo scores for runs using both schemes improved when grid spacing was refined, with Thompson runs improving most significantly. Additionally, near storm environments were analyzed to understand why the simulated bow echoes changed as grid spacing was changed. A relationship existed between bow echo production and cold pool strength, as well as with the magnitude of microphysical cooling rates. More numerous updrafts were present in 1-km runs, leading to longer intense lines of convection which were more likely to evolve into longer-lived bow echoes in more cases. Large-scale features, such as a low-level jet orientation more perpendicular to the convective line and surface boundaries, often had to be present for bow echoes to occur in the 3-km runs.
more »
« less
Differences between Severe and Nonsevere Warm-Season, Nocturnal Bow Echo Environments
Abstract Nocturnal bow echoes can produce wind damage, even in situations where elevated convection occurs. Accurate forecasts of wind potential tend to be more challenging for operational forecasters than for daytime bows because of incomplete understanding of how elevated convection interacts with the stable boundary layer. The present study compares the differences in warm-season, nocturnal bow echo environments in which high intensity [>70 kt (1 kt ≈ 0.51 m s −1 )] severe winds (HS), low intensity (50–55 kt) severe winds (LS), and nonsevere winds (NS) occurred. Using a sample of 132 events from 2010 to 2018, 43 forecast parameters from the SPC mesoanalysis system were examined over a 120 km × 120 km region centered on the strongest storm report or most pronounced bowing convective segment. Severe composite parameters are found to be among the best discriminators between all severity types, especially derecho composite parameter (DCP) and significant tornado parameter (STP). Shear parameters are significant discriminators only between severe and nonsevere cases, while convective available potential energy (CAPE) parameters are significant discriminators only between HS and LS/NS bow echoes. Convective inhibition (CIN) is among the worst discriminators for all severity types. The parameters providing the most predictive skill for HS bow echoes are STP and most unstable CAPE, and for LS bow echoes these are the V wind component at best CAPE (VMXP) level, STP, and the supercell composite parameter. Combinations of two parameters are shown to improve forecasting skill further, with the combination of surface-based CAPE and 0–6-km U shear component, and DCP and VMXP, providing the most skillful HS and LS forecasts, respectively.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2022888
- PAR ID:
- 10229052
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Weather and Forecasting
- Volume:
- 36
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 0882-8156
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 53 to 74
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Severe storms produce hazardous weather phenomena, such as large hail, damaging winds, and tornadoes. However, relationships between convective parameters and confirmed severe weather occurrences are poorly quantified in south-central Brazil. This study explores severe weather reports and measurements from newly available datasets. Hail, damaging wind, and tornado reports are sourced from the PREVOTS project from June 2018 to December 2021, while measurements of convectively induced wind gusts from 1996 to 2019 are obtained from METAR reports and from Brazil’s operational network of automated weather stations. Proximal convective parameters were computed from ERA5 reanalysis for these reports and used to perform a discriminant analysis using mixed-layer CAPE and deep-layer shear (DLS). Compared to other regions, thermodynamic parameters associated with severe weather episodes exhibit lower magnitudes in south-central Brazil. DLS displays better performance in distinguishing different types of hazardous weather, but does not discriminate well between distinct severity levels. To address the sensitivity of the discriminant analysis to distinct environmental regimes and hazard types, five different discriminants are assessed. These include discriminants for any severe storm, severe hail only, severe wind gust only, and all environments but broken into “high” and “low” CAPE regimes. The best performance of the discriminant analysis is found for the “high” CAPE regime, followed by the severe wind regime. All discriminants demonstrate that DLS plays a more important role in conditioning Brazilian severe storm environments than other regions, confirming the need to ensure that parameters and discriminants are tuned to local severe weather conditions.more » « less
-
Abstract This study presents an evaluation of the skill of 12 global climate models from phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) archive in capturing convective storm parameters over the United States. For the historical reference period 1979–2014, we compare the model-simulated 6-hourly convective available potential energy (CAPE), convective inhibition (CIN), 0–1-km wind shear (S01), and 0–6-km wind shear (S06) to those from two independent reanalysis datasets: ERA5 and Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA2). To obtain a comprehensive picture, we analyze the parameter distribution, climatological mean, extreme, and thresholded frequency of convective parameters. The analysis reveals significant bias in capturing both magnitude and spatial patterns, which also vary across the seasons. The spatial distribution of means and extremes of the parameters indicates that most models tend to overestimate CAPE, whereas S01 and S06 are underrepresented to varying extents. Additionally, models tend to underestimate extremes in CIN. Comparing the model profiles with rawinsonde profiles indicates that most of the high CAPE models have a warm and moist bias. We also find that the near-surface wind speed is generally underestimated by the models. The intermodel spread is larger for thermodynamic parameters as compared to kinematic parameters. The models generally have a significant positive bias in CAPE over western and eastern regions of the continental United States. More importantly, the bias in the thresholded frequency of all four variables is considerably larger than the bias in the mean, suggesting a nonuniform bias across the distribution. This likely leads to an underrepresentation of favorable severe thunderstorm environments and has the potential to influence dynamical downscaling simulations via initial and boundary conditions. Significance StatementGlobal climate model projections are often used to explore future changes in severe thunderstorm activity. However, climate model outputs often have significant biases, and they can strongly impact the results. In this study, we thoroughly examined biases in convective parameters in 12 models from phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project with respect to two reanalysis datasets. The analysis is performed for North America, covering the period 1979–2014. The study reveals significant biases in convective parameters that differ between models and are tied to the biases in temperature, humidity, and wind profiles. These results provide valuable insight into selecting the right set of models to analyze future changes in severe thunderstorm activity across the North American continent.more » « less
-
Abstract This study examines the possibility that supercell tornado forecasts could be improved by utilizing the storm-relative helicity (SRH) in the lowest few hundred meters of the atmosphere (instead of much deeper layers). This hypothesis emerges from a growing body of literature linking the near-ground wind profile to the organization of the low-level mesocyclone and thus the probability of tornadogenesis. This study further addresses the ramifications of near-ground SRH to the skill of the significant tornado parameter (STP), which is probably the most commonly used environmental indicator for tornadic thunderstorms. Using a sample of 20 194 severe, right-moving supercells spanning a 13-yr period, sounding-derived parameters were compared using forecast verification metrics, emphasizing a high probability of detection for tornadic supercells while minimizing false alarms. This climatology reveals that the kinematic components of environmental profiles are more skillful at discriminating significantly tornadic supercells from severe, nontornadic supercells than the thermodynamic components. The effective-layer SRH has by far the greatest forecast skill among the components of the STP, as it is currently defined. However, using progressively shallower layers for the SRH calculation leads to increasing forecast skill. Replacing the effective-layer SRH with the 0–500 m AGL SRH in the formulation of STP increases the number of correctly predicted events by 8% and decreases the number of missed events and false alarms by 18%. These results provide promising evidence that forecast parameters can still be improved through increased understanding of the environmental controls on the processes that govern tornado formation.more » « less
-
Forecasts of tropical cyclone (TC) tornadoes are less skillful than their non‐TC counterparts at all lead times. The development of a convection‐allowing regional ensemble, known as the Warn‐on‐Forecast System (WoFS), may help improve short‐fused TC tornado forecasts. As a first step, this study investigates the fidelity of convective‐scale kinematic and thermodynamic environments to a preliminary set of soundings from WoFS forecasts for comparison with radiosondes for selected 2020 landfalling TCs. Our study shows reasonable agreement between TC convective‐scale kinematic environments in WoFS versus observed soundings at all forecast lead times. Nonetheless, WoFS is biased toward weaker than observed TC‐relative radial winds, and stronger than observed near‐surface tangential winds with weaker winds aloft, during the forecast. Analysis of storm‐relative helicity (SRH) shows that WoFS underestimates extreme observed values. Convective‐scale thermodynamic environments are well simulated for both temperature and dewpoint at all lead times. However, WoFS is biased moister with steeper lapse rates compared to observations during the forecast. Both CAPE and, to a lesser extent, 0–3‐km CAPE distributions are narrower in WoFS than in radiosondes, with an underestimation of higher CAPE values. Together, these results suggest that WoFS may have utility for forecasting convective‐scale environments in landfalling TCs with lead times of several hours.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-20-0137.1
