An official website of the United States government
Blikstein, P.; Van Aalst, J.; Kizito, R.; Brennan, K.
(Ed.)
Does a Computer Science Graduation Requirement Contribute to Increased Enrollment in Advanced Computer Science Coursework?
- PAR ID:
- 10231549
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- 2020 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT)
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1 to 2
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
null (Ed.)We will present emerging findings from an ongoing study of instruction at the intersection of science and computer science for middle school science classrooms. This paper focuses on student knowledge and dispositional outcomes in relation to a 2 week/10-lesson learning sequence. Instruction aims to broaden participation in STEM pathways through a virtual simulated internship in which students inhabit the role of interns working to develop a restoration plan to improve the health of coral reef populations. Through this collaborative work, students construct understanding of biotic and abiotic interactions within the reef and develop a computational model of the ecosystem. Analysis of pre/post surveys for n=381 students revealed that students who participated in the 2 week/10 lesson integrated computational thinking in science learning sequence demonstrated significant learning gains on an external measure of CT (0.522***; effect size=0.32). Drawing on scales from the Activation Lab suite of measures, pre/post surveys revealed increased competency beliefs about computer programming (mean difference =1.13***; effect size=1.01), and increased value assigned to STEM (0.78***; effect size=0.945). We also discuss the design of the instructional sequence and the theoretical framework for its development.more » « less
-
Since the 1960s, the ACM has provided routinely updated guidelines for what concepts constitute a computer science curriculum, with the latest version currently in development in 2023. These guidelines have traditionally provided a model curriculum from which universities can choose to adopt or modify for their own purposes. What is unclear, however, is to what degree schools follow the curriculum recommendations that the ACM provides. While most faculty and students likely have knowledge of their own institution's curriculum, as well as what courses are offered at a small selection of other schools, the goal of the work presented in this poster is to distill a cohesive view of what computer science curriculums in their second and third years look like across a broad range of universities across a range of institutions. Our goal with this work was to answer the following question: What do computer science course requirements look like at a wide range of different institutions? We believe the work will help those who are trying to develop curriculum changes within their own institutions and aims to provide a more cohesive view of what trends and patterns exist in course offerings and degree requirements for computer science in the second and third years across a wide range of universities.more » « less
-
There can be many conflicting goals for the design of a computer science curriculum including: immediate employability in industry, preparation for long-term success in an ever-changing discipline and preparation for graduate (that is, post-graduate) study. Emphasis on immediate employability may lead to prioritizing current tools and techniques at the expense of foundational and theoretical skills as well as broader liberal-arts education that are crucial to long-term career success and for graduate study. The implications of these conflicting goals include allocation of finite resources (time, courses in the curriculum), unwillingness of students to invest in the mathematics that they see as irrelevant to their immediate career goals, and reluctance of faculty to have their courses driven by a continually evolving marketplace of tools and APIs. A balanced curriculum benefits all stakeholders: students, employers, and faculty. Would a data-driven approach help faculty design curricula that effectively balance these multiple goals? For example, if we ask graduates of computer science programs to reflect on the impact of their undergraduate education, explicitly focusing on short and long-term impact, will there be enough meaningful data to significantly inform curricular design? A recent survey of industry professionals undertaken by the ACM/IEEE-CS/AAAI 2023 Computer Science Curricular Task Force (CS2023) points the way. This column presents one aspect of that survey—a focus on comparing short-term versus long-term views—and calls for similar surveys of industry professionals to be conducted on an ongoing basis to refine our understanding of the role played by various elements of undergraduate computer science curricula in the success of graduates.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT49803.2020.9272493
