More Like this

1. Using Restriction Endonuclease, Protection, Selection, and Amplification to Identify Preferred DNA-Binding Sequences of Microbial Transcription Factors

   https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.04397-22  

   Barrows, John K.; Van Dyke, Michael W. (February 2023, Microbiology Spectrum)

   Polen, Tino (Ed.)

   ABSTRACT Regulation of gene expression is a vital component of cellular biology. Transcription factor proteins often bind regulatory DNA sequences upstream of transcription start sites to facilitate the activation or repression of RNA polymerase. Research laboratories have devoted many projects to understanding the transcription regulatory networks for transcription factors, as these regulated genes provide critical insight into the biology of the host organism. Various in vivo and in vitro assays have been developed to elucidate transcription regulatory networks. Several assays, including SELEX-seq and ChIP-seq, capture DNA-bound transcription factors to determine the preferred DNA-binding sequences, which can then be mapped to the host organism’s genome to identify candidate regulatory genes. In this protocol, we describe an alternative in vitro , iterative selection approach to ascertaining DNA-binding sequences of a transcription factor of interest using restriction endonuclease, protection, selection, and amplification (REPSA). Contrary to traditional antibody-based capture methods, REPSA selects for transcription factor-bound DNA sequences by challenging binding reactions with a type IIS restriction endonuclease. Cleavage-resistant DNA species are amplified by PCR and then used as inputs for the next round of REPSA. This process is repeated until a protected DNA species is observed by gel electrophoresis, which is an indication of a successful REPSA experiment. Subsequent high-throughput sequencing of REPSA-selected DNAs accompanied by motif discovery and scanning analyses can be used for determining transcription factor consensus binding sequences and potential regulated genes, providing critical first steps in determining organisms’ transcription regulatory networks. IMPORTANCE Transcription regulatory proteins are an essential class of proteins that help maintain cellular homeostasis by adapting the transcriptome based on environmental cues. Dysregulation of transcription factors can lead to diseases such as cancer, and many eukaryotic and prokaryotic transcription factors have become enticing therapeutic targets. Additionally, in many understudied organisms, the transcription regulatory networks for uncharacterized transcription factors remain unknown. As such, the need for experimental techniques to establish transcription regulatory networks is paramount. Here, we describe a step-by-step protocol for REPSA, an inexpensive, iterative selection technique to identify transcription factor-binding sequences without the need for antibody-based capture methods. 

   more » « less
2. Conserved Gsx2/Ind homeodomain monomer versus homodimer DNA binding defines regulatory outcomes in flies and mice

   https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.343053.120  

   Salomone, Joseph; Qin, Shenyue; Fufa, Temesgen D.; Cain, Brittany; Farrow, Edward; Guan, Bin; Hufnagel, Robert B.; Nakafuku, Masato; Lim, Hee-Woong; Campbell, Kenneth; et al (January 2021, Genes & Development)

   null (Ed.)

   How homeodomain proteins gain sufficient specificity to control different cell fates has been a long-standing problem in developmental biology. The conserved Gsx homeodomain proteins regulate specific aspects of neural development in animals from flies to mammals, and yet they belong to a large transcription factor family that bind nearly identical DNA sequences in vitro. Here, we show that the mouse and fly Gsx factors unexpectedly gain DNA binding specificity by forming cooperative homodimers on precisely spaced and oriented DNA sites. High-resolution genomic binding assays revealed that Gsx2 binds both monomer and homodimer sites in the developing mouse ventral telencephalon. Importantly, reporter assays showed that Gsx2 mediates opposing outcomes in a DNA binding site-dependent manner: Monomer Gsx2 binding represses transcription, whereas homodimer binding stimulates gene expression. In Drosophila , the Gsx homolog, Ind, similarly represses or stimulates transcription in a site-dependent manner via an autoregulatory enhancer containing a combination of monomer and homodimer sites. Integrating these findings, we test a model showing how the homodimer to monomer site ratio and the Gsx protein levels defines gene up-regulation versus down-regulation. Altogether, these data serve as a new paradigm for how cooperative homeodomain transcription factor binding can increase target specificity and alter regulatory outcomes. 

   more » « less
3. Manganese‐dependent transcription regulation by MntR and PerR in Thermus thermophilus HB8

   https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.15278  

   Barrows, John_K; Stubbs, Kamya_A; Padilla‐Montoya, Irina_F; Leeper, Thomas_C; Van Dyke, Michael_W (May 2024, Molecular Microbiology)

   Abstract Bacteria contain conserved mechanisms to control the intracellular levels of metal ions. Metalloregulatory transcription factors bind metal cations and play a central role in regulating gene expression of metal transporters. Often, these transcription factors regulate transcription by binding to a specific DNA sequence in the promoter region of target genes. Understanding the preferred DNA‐binding sequence for transcriptional regulators can help uncover novel gene targets and provide insight into the biological role of the transcription factor in the host organism. Here, we identify consensus DNA‐binding sequences and subsequent transcription regulatory networks for two metalloregulators from the ferric uptake regulator (FUR) and diphtheria toxin repressor (DtxR) superfamilies inThermus thermophilusHB8. By homology search, we classify the DtxR homolog as a manganese‐specific, MntR (TtMntR), and the FUR homolog as a peroxide‐sensing, PerR (TtPerR). Both transcription factors repress separate ZIP transporter genes in vivo, andTtPerR acts as a bifunctional transcription regulator by activating the expression of ferric and hemin transport systems. We showTtPerR andTtMntR bind DNA in the presence of manganese in vitro and in vivo; however,TtPerR is unable to bind DNA in the presence of iron, likely due to iron‐mediated histidine oxidation. Unlike canonical PerR homologs,TtPerR does not appear to contribute to peroxide detoxification. Instead, theTtPerR regulon and DNA binding sequence are more reminiscent of Fur or Mur homologs. Collectively, these results highlight the similarities and differences between two metalloregulatory superfamilies and underscore the interplay of manganese and iron in transcription factor regulation. 

   more » « less
4. The Hypersaline Archaeal Histones HpyA and HstA Are DNA Binding Proteins That Defy Categorization According to Commonly Used Functional Criteria

   https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.03449-22  

   Sakrikar, Saaz; Hackley, Rylee K.; Martinez-Pastor, Mar; Darnell, Cynthia L.; Vreugdenhil, Angie; Schmid, Amy K. (April 2023, mBio)

   Komeili, Arash (Ed.)

   ABSTRACT Histone proteins are found across diverse lineages of Archaea , many of which package DNA and form chromatin. However, previous research has led to the hypothesis that the histone-like proteins of high-salt-adapted archaea, or halophiles, function differently. The sole histone protein encoded by the model halophilic species Halobacterium salinarum , HpyA, is nonessential and expressed at levels too low to enable genome-wide DNA packaging. Instead, HpyA mediates the transcriptional response to salt stress. Here we compare the features of genome-wide binding of HpyA to those of HstA, the sole histone of another model halophile, Haloferax volcanii . hstA , like hpyA , is a nonessential gene. To better understand HpyA and HstA functions, protein-DNA binding data (chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing [ChIP-seq]) of these halophilic histones are compared to publicly available ChIP-seq data from DNA binding proteins across all domains of life, including transcription factors (TFs), nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs), and histones. These analyses demonstrate that HpyA and HstA bind the genome infrequently in discrete regions, which is similar to TFs but unlike NAPs, which bind a much larger genomic fraction. However, unlike TFs that typically bind in intergenic regions, HpyA and HstA binding sites are located in both coding and intergenic regions. The genome-wide dinucleotide periodicity known to facilitate histone binding was undetectable in the genomes of both species. Instead, TF-like and histone-like binding sequence preferences were detected for HstA and HpyA, respectively. Taken together, these data suggest that halophilic archaeal histones are unlikely to facilitate genome-wide chromatin formation and that their function defies categorization as a TF, NAP, or histone. IMPORTANCE Most cells in eukaryotic species—from yeast to humans—possess histone proteins that pack and unpack DNA in response to environmental cues. These essential proteins regulate genes necessary for important cellular processes, including development and stress protection. Although the histone fold domain originated in the domain of life Archaea , the function of archaeal histone-like proteins is not well understood relative to those of eukaryotes. We recently discovered that, unlike histones of eukaryotes, histones in hypersaline-adapted archaeal species do not package DNA and can act as transcription factors (TFs) to regulate stress response gene expression. However, the function of histones across species of hypersaline-adapted archaea still remains unclear. Here, we compare hypersaline histone function to a variety of DNA binding proteins across the tree of life, revealing histone-like behavior in some respects and specific transcriptional regulatory function in others. 

   more » « less
5. Transcription factors perform a 2-step search of the nucleus

   https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyac111  

   Staller, Max Valentín; Rine, ed., J. (August 2022, Genetics)

   Abstract Transcription factors regulate gene expression by binding to regulatory DNA and recruiting regulatory protein complexes. The DNA-binding and protein-binding functions of transcription factors are traditionally described as independent functions performed by modular protein domains. Here, I argue that genome binding can be a 2-part process with both DNA-binding and protein-binding steps, enabling transcription factors to perform a 2-step search of the nucleus to find their appropriate binding sites in a eukaryotic genome. I support this hypothesis with new and old results in the literature, discuss how this hypothesis parsimoniously resolves outstanding problems, and present testable predictions. 

   more » « less