An official website of the United States government
Biological rhythms are ubiquitous. They can be generated by circadian oscillators, which produce daily rhythms in physiology and behavior, as well as by developmental oscillators such as the segmentation clock, which periodically produces modular developmental units. Here, we show that the circadian clock controls the timing of late-stage floret development, or anthesis, in domesticated sunflowers. In these plants, up to thousands of individual florets are tightly packed onto a capitulum disk. While early floret development occurs continuously across capitula to generate iconic spiral phyllotaxy, during anthesis floret development occurs in discrete ring-like pseudowhorls with up to hundreds of florets undergoing simultaneous maturation. We demonstrate circadian regulation of floral organ growth and show that the effects of light on this process are time-of-day dependent. Delays in the phase of floral anthesis delay morning visits by pollinators, while disruption of circadian rhythms in floral organ development causes loss of pseudowhorl formation and large reductions in pollinator visits. We therefore show that the sunflower circadian clock acts in concert with environmental response pathways to tightly synchronize the anthesis of hundreds of florets each day, generating spatial patterns on the developing capitulum disk. This coordinated mass release of floral rewards at predictable times of day likely promotes pollinator visits and plant reproductive success.
more »
« less
Seasonality and light phase-resetting in the mammalian circadian rhythm
Abstract We study the impact of light on the mammalian circadian system using the theory of phase response curves. Using a recently developed ansatz we derive a low-dimensional macroscopic model for the core circadian clock in mammals. Significantly, the variables and parameters in our model have physiological interpretations and may be compared with experimental results. We focus on the effect of four key factors which help shape the mammalian phase response to light: heterogeneity in the population of oscillators, the structure of the typical light phase response curve, the fraction of oscillators which receive direct light input and changes in the coupling strengths associated with seasonal day-lengths. We find these factors can explain several experimental results and provide insight into the processing of light information in the mammalian circadian system. In particular, we find that the sensitivity of the circadian system to light may be modulated by changes in the relative coupling forces between the light sensing and non-sensing populations. Finally, we show how seasonal day-length, after-effects to light entrainment and seasonal variations in light sensitivity in the mammalian circadian clock are interrelated.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10244747
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Scientific Reports
- Volume:
- 10
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 2045-2322
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
The synchronization dynamics for the circadian gene expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus is investigated using a transcriptional circadian clock gene oscillator model. With global coupling in constant dark (DD) conditions, the model exhibits a one-cluster phase synchronized state, in dim light (dim LL), bistability between one- and two-cluster states and in bright LL, a two-cluster state. The two-cluster phase synchronized state, where some oscillator pairs synchronize in-phase, and some anti-phase, can explain the splitting of the circadian clock, i.e., generation of two bouts of daily activities with certain species, e.g., with hamsters. The one- and two-cluster states can be reached by transferring the animal from DD or bright LL to dim LL, i.e., the circadian synchrony has a memory effect. The stability of the one- and two-cluster states was interpreted analytically by extracting phase models from the ordinary differential equation models. In a modular network with two strongly coupled oscillator populations with weak intragroup coupling, with appropriate initial conditions, one group is synchronized to the one-cluster state and the other group to the two-cluster state, resulting in a weak-chimera state. Computational modeling suggests that the daily rhythms in sleep–wake depend on light intensity acting on bilateral networks of suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) oscillators. Addition of a network heterogeneity (coupling between the left and right SCN) allowed the system to exhibit chimera states. The simulations can guide experiments in the circadian rhythm research to explore the effect of light intensity on the complexities of circadian desynchronization.more » « less
-
Circadian rhythms are internal processes repeating approximately every 24 hours in living organisms. The dominant circadian pacemaker is synchronized to the environmental light-dark cycle. Other circadian pacemakers, which can have noncanonical circadian mechanisms, are revealed by arousing stimuli, such as scheduled feeding, palatable meals and running wheel access, or methamphetamine administration. Organisms also have ultradian rhythms, which have periods shorter than circadian rhythms. However, the biological mechanism, origin, and functional significance of ultradian rhythms are not well-elucidated. The dominant circadian rhythm often masks ultradian rhythms; therefore, we disabled the canonical circadian clock of mice by knocking out Per1/2/3 genes, where Per1 and Per2 are essential components of the mammalian light-sensitive circadian mechanism. Furthermore, we recorded wheel-running activity every minute under constant darkness for 272 days. We then investigated rhythmic components in the absence of external influences, applying unique multiscale time-resolved methods to analyze the oscillatory dynamics with time-varying frequencies. We found four rhythmic components with periods of ∼17 h, ∼8 h, ∼4 h, and ∼20 min. When the ∼17-h rhythm was prominent, the ∼8-h rhythm was of low amplitude. This phenomenon occurred periodically approximately every 2-3 weeks. We found that the ∼4-h and ∼20-min rhythms were harmonics of the ∼8-h rhythm. Coupling analysis of the ridge-extracted instantaneous frequencies revealed strong and stable phase coupling from the slower oscillations (∼17, ∼8, and ∼4 h) to the faster oscillations (∼20 min), and weak and less stable phase coupling in the reverse direction and between the slower oscillations. Together, this study elucidated the relationship between the oscillators in the absence of the canonical circadian clock, which is critical for understanding their functional significance. These studies are essential as disruption of circadian rhythms contributes to diseases, such as cancer and obesity, as well as mood disorders.more » « less
-
SUMMARY Daily rhythms in physiology are obvious and widespread. While for millennia it was thought that these cycles represent passive responses to environmental cycles, we now recognize that many of them are governed by circadian oscillators. In plants, these cell‐autonomous oscillators regulate daily processes such as photosynthesis, organ growth, and hormone production, as well as seasonal transitions like flowering. Furthermore, the circadian system gates plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses, modulating susceptibility to pathogens and environmental extremes in a time‐of‐day‐dependent manner. Variants of circadian clock genes have been repeatedly selected during crop domestication and improvement, highlighting the importance of the circadian system to plants and its relevance for agriculture. Here, I review the history of circadian studies in plants and summarize our current understanding of the molecular nature of the circadian oscillator. I also discuss how this complex network both responds to and is buffered against changes in the environment. Next, I examine how circadian oscillators differ between various tissues and how their activities are coordinated throughout the plant body. Finally, I discuss emerging directions, such as ways in which this understanding can be applied to crop improvement in the face of climate change.more » « less
-
In early childhood, consolidation of sleep from a biphasic to a monophasic sleep-wake pattern, that is, the transition from sleeping during an afternoon nap and at night to sleeping only during the night, represents a major developmental milestone. Reduced napping behavior is associated with an advance in the timing of the circadian system; however, it is unknown if this advance represents a standard response of the circadian clock to altered patterns of light exposure or if it additionally reflects features of the developing circadian system. Using a mathematical model of the human circadian pacemaker, we investigated the impact of napping and non-napping patterns of light exposure on entrained circadian phases. Simulated light schedules were based on published data from 20 children (34.2 ± 2.0 months) with habitual napping or non-napping sleep patterns (15 nappers). We found the model predicted different circadian phases for napping and non-napping light patterns: both the decrease in afternoon light during the nap and the increase in evening light associated with napping toddlers’ later bedtimes contributed to the observed circadian phase difference produced between napping and non-napping light schedules. We systematically quantified the effects on phase shifting of nap duration, timing, and light intensity, finding larger phase delays occurred for longer and earlier naps. In addition, we simulated phase response curves to a 1-h light pulse and 1-h dark pulse to predict phase and intensity dependence of these changes in light exposure. We found the light pulse produced larger shifts compared with the dark pulse, and we analyzed the model dynamics to identify the features contributing to this asymmetry. These findings suggest that napping status affects circadian timing due to altered patterns of light exposure, with the dynamics of the circadian clock and light processing mediating the effects of the dark pulse associated with a daytime nap.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74002-2
