skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Correcting Biases in Historical Bathythermograph Data Using Artificial Neural Networks
Abstract Historical estimates of ocean heat content (OHC) are important for understanding the climate sensitivity of the Earth system and for tracking changes in Earth’s energy balance over time. Prior to 2004, these estimates rely primarily on temperature measurements from mechanical and expendable bathythermograph (BT) instruments that were deployed on large scales by naval vessels and ships of opportunity. These BT temperature measurements are subject to well-documented biases, but even the best calibration methods still exhibit residual biases when compared with high-quality temperature datasets. Here, we use a new approach to reduce biases in historical BT data after binning them to a regular grid such as would be used for estimating OHC. Our method consists of an ensemble of artificial neural networks that corrects biases with respect to depth, year, and water temperature in the top 10 m. A global correction and corrections optimized to specific BT probe types are presented for the top 1800 m. Our approach differs from most prior studies by accounting for multiple sources of error in a single correction instead of separating the bias into several independent components. These new global and probe-specific corrections perform on par with widely used calibration methods on a series of metrics that examine the residual temperature biases with respect to a high-quality reference dataset. However, distinct patterns emerge across these various calibration methods when they are extrapolated to BT data that are not included in our cross-instrument comparison, contributing to uncertainty that will ultimately impact estimates of OHC.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1948985
PAR ID:
10252573
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
Volume:
37
Issue:
10
ISSN:
0739-0572
Page Range / eLocation ID:
1781 to 1800
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; (, figshare)
    Historical estimates of ocean heat content (OHC) are important for understanding the climate sensitivity of the Earth system, and for tracking changes in the Earth’s energy balance over time. Prior to 2004, these estimates rely primarily on temperature measurements from mechanical and expendable bathythermograph (BT) instruments that were deployed on large scales by naval vessels and ships of opportunity. These BT temperature measurements are subject to well-documented biases, but even the best calibration methods still exhibit residual biases when compared to high-quality temperature datasets. Here, we use a new approach to reduce biases in historical BT data after binning them to a regular grid such as would be used for estimating OHC. Our method consists of an ensemble of artificial neural networks that corrects biases with respect to depth, year, and water temperature in the top 10 meters. A global correction, as well as corrections optimized to specific BT probe types are presented for the top 1800 m. Our approach differs from most prior studies by accounting for multiple sources of error in a single correction, instead of separating the bias into several independent components. These new global and probe-specific corrections perform on par with widely-used calibration methods on a series of metrics that examine the residual temperature biases with respect to a high-quality reference dataset. However, distinct patterns emerge across these various calibration methods when they are extrapolated to BT data not included in our cross-instrument comparison, contributing to uncertainty that will ultimately impact estimates of OHC. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; (, Limnology and Oceanography: Methods)
    Abstract Measurements by the submersible ultraviolet nitrate analyzer (SUNA) can be used to derive high‐resolution in situ nitrate concentration with reliable accuracy and precision. Here we report our operational practices for SUNA deployment (including pre‐cruise instrument preparation and in‐cruise instrument maintenance) and detailed post‐cruise nitrate quality control procedures for SUNA integrated onto the CTD rosette. This work is based on experiences and findings from over 500 individual SUNA casts collected from 24 cruises (of which 14 cruises have been quality controlled so far) over the past 5 yr. After applying previously published spectral corrections for temperature, salinity, and pressure effects, we found residual biases in SUNA nitrate estimates compared to independently measured discrete samples. We further develop and assess a new two‐step procedure to remove remaining biases: (1) a general temperature‐dependent adjustment at low‐nitrate concentrations; and (2) a cruise‐specific full‐range bias correction. Our final quality‐controlled SUNA nitrate data achieve an accuracy of 0.34–0.78 μM, with a precision of 0.08–0.21 μM, at a vertical resolution of 1 m. Additional comparisons between the nitrate and density data confirm the high quality of the quality‐controlled SUNA data. Although applying spectral correction algorithms increases the accuracy and precision of the instrument‐output nitrate concentration, we emphasize that additional constraints of SUNA measurements against other independent sources (e.g., bottle data, temperature, and density) are irreplaceable to ensure the accuracy of final nitrate data. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, Surveys in Geophysics)
    Abstract Earth’s energy imbalance (EEI) is a fundamental metric of global Earth system change, quantifying the cumulative impact of natural and anthropogenic radiative forcings and feedback. To date, the most precise measurements of EEI change are obtained through radiometric observations at the top of the atmosphere (TOA), while the quantification of EEI absolute magnitude is facilitated through heat inventory analysis, where ~ 90% of heat uptake manifests as an increase in ocean heat content (OHC). Various international groups provide OHC datasets derived from in situ and satellite observations, as well as from reanalyses ingesting many available observations. The WCRP formed the GEWEX-EEI Assessment Working Group to better understand discrepancies, uncertainties and reconcile current knowledge of EEI magnitude, variability and trends. Here, 21 OHC datasets and ocean heat uptake (OHU) rates are intercompared, providing OHU estimates ranging between 0.40 ± 0.12 and 0.96 ± 0.08 W m−2(2005–2019), a spread that is slightly reduced when unequal ocean sampling is accounted for, and that is largely attributable to differing source data, mapping methods and quality control procedures. The rate of increase in OHU varies substantially between − 0.03 ± 0.13 (reanalysis product) and 1.1 ± 0.6 W m−2 dec−1(satellite product). Products that either more regularly observe (satellites) or fill in situ data-sparse regions based on additional physical knowledge (some reanalysis and hybrid products) tend to track radiometric EEI variability better than purely in situ-based OHC products. This paper also examines zonal trends in TOA radiative fluxes and the impact of data gaps on trend estimates. The GEWEX-EEI community aims to refine their assessment studies, to forge a path toward best practices, e.g., in uncertainty quantification, and to formulate recommendations for future activities. 
    more » « less
  4. ; (, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology)
    Abstract To overcome challenges with observing ocean heat content (OHC) over the entire ocean, we propose a novel approach that exploits the abundance of satellite data, including data from modern satellite geomagnetic surveys such as Swarm. The method considers a novel combination of conventional in situ (temperature and pressure) as well as satellite (altimetry and gravimetry) data with estimates of ocean electrical conductance (depth-integrated conductivity), which can potentially be obtained from magnetic observations (by satellite, land, seafloor, ocean, and airborne magnetometers). To demonstrate the potential benefit of the proposed method, we sample model output of an ocean state estimate to reflect existing observations and train a machine learning algorithm [Generalized Additive Model (GAM)] on these samples. We then calculate OHC everywhere using information potentially derivable from various global satellite coverage—including magnetic observations—to gauge the GAM’s goodness of fit on a global scale. Inclusion of in situ observations of OHC in the upper 2000 m from Argo-like floats and conductance data each reduce the root-mean-square error by an order of magnitude. Retraining the GAM with recent ship-based hydrographic data attains a smaller RMSE in polar oceans than training the GAM only once on all available historical ship-based hydrographic data; the opposite is true elsewhere. The GAM more accurately calculates OHC anomalies throughout the water column than below 2000 m and can detect global OHC anomalies over multiyear time scales, even when considering hypothetical measurement errors. Our method could complement existing methods and its accuracy could be improved through careful ship-based campaign planning. Significance Statement The purpose of this manuscript is to demonstrate the potential for practical implementation of a remote monitoring method for ocean heat content (OHC) anomalies. To do this, we sample data from a reanalysis product primarily because of the dearth of observations below 2000 m depth that can be used for validation and the fact that full-depth-integrated electrical seawater conductivity data products derived from satellite magnetometry are not yet available. We evaluate multiple factors related to the accuracy of OHC anomaly estimation and find that, even with hypothetical measurement errors, our method can be used to monitor OHC anomalies on multiyear time scales. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society)
    null (Ed.)
    ABSTRACT Precision calibration poses challenges to experiments probing the redshifted 21-cm signal of neutral hydrogen from the Cosmic Dawn and Epoch of Reionization (z ∼ 30–6). In both interferometric and global signal experiments, systematic calibration is the leading source of error. Though many aspects of calibration have been studied, the overlap between the two types of instruments has received less attention. We investigate the sky based calibration of total power measurements with a HERA dish and an EDGES-style antenna to understand the role of autocorrelations in the calibration of an interferometer and the role of sky in calibrating a total power instrument. Using simulations we study various scenarios such as time variable gain, incomplete sky calibration model, and primary beam model. We find that temporal gain drifts, sky model incompleteness, and beam inaccuracies cause biases in the receiver gain amplitude and the receiver temperature estimates. In some cases, these biases mix spectral structure between beam and sky resulting in spectrally variable gain errors. Applying the calibration method to the HERA and EDGES data, we find good agreement with calibration via the more standard methods. Although instrumental gains are consistent with beam and sky errors similar in scale to those simulated, the receiver temperatures show significant deviations from expected values. While we show that it is possible to partially mitigate biases due to model inaccuracies by incorporating a time-dependent gain model in calibration, the resulting errors on calibration products are larger and more correlated. Completely addressing these biases will require more accurate sky and primary beam models. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email