skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Bias‐corrected high‐resolution vertical nitrate profiles from the CTD rosette‐mounted submersible ultraviolet nitrate analyzer
Abstract Measurements by the submersible ultraviolet nitrate analyzer (SUNA) can be used to derive high‐resolution in situ nitrate concentration with reliable accuracy and precision. Here we report our operational practices for SUNA deployment (including pre‐cruise instrument preparation and in‐cruise instrument maintenance) and detailed post‐cruise nitrate quality control procedures for SUNA integrated onto the CTD rosette. This work is based on experiences and findings from over 500 individual SUNA casts collected from 24 cruises (of which 14 cruises have been quality controlled so far) over the past 5 yr. After applying previously published spectral corrections for temperature, salinity, and pressure effects, we found residual biases in SUNA nitrate estimates compared to independently measured discrete samples. We further develop and assess a new two‐step procedure to remove remaining biases: (1) a general temperature‐dependent adjustment at low‐nitrate concentrations; and (2) a cruise‐specific full‐range bias correction. Our final quality‐controlled SUNA nitrate data achieve an accuracy of 0.34–0.78 μM, with a precision of 0.08–0.21 μM, at a vertical resolution of 1 m. Additional comparisons between the nitrate and density data confirm the high quality of the quality‐controlled SUNA data. Although applying spectral correction algorithms increases the accuracy and precision of the instrument‐output nitrate concentration, we emphasize that additional constraints of SUNA measurements against other independent sources (e.g., bottle data, temperature, and density) are irreplaceable to ensure the accuracy of final nitrate data.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2322676 1655686
PAR ID:
10559655
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
Volume:
22
Issue:
12
ISSN:
1541-5856
Format(s):
Medium: X Size: p. 889-902
Size(s):
p. 889-902
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. This dataset contains high-quality high-resolution nitrate data collected from a submersible ultraviolet nitrate analyzer (SUNA) mounted on the CTD rosette. Both raw and bias-corrected, quality-controlled data are included. The raw data include the instrument's estimate of nitrate concentration with dark values and light intensity at 256 wavelengths. Our quality-controlled SUNA nitrate data have an accuracy of 0.34-0.78 micromoles per liter, with a precision of 0.08-0.21 micromoles per liter, at a vertical resolution of 1 m. These data are collected from about 21 routinely occupied stations along a cross-shelf transect spanning southward from Martha's Vineyard, MA to just beyond the shelf break onboard the seasonal Northeast U.S. Shelf Long-Term Ecological Research (NES-LTER) survey cruises since February 2019. Data in CSV format. 
    more » « less
  2. The Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI) deployed both the In-Situ Ultraviolet Spectrophotometer (ISUS) and Submersible Underwater Nitrate Sensor (SUNA) for continuous, in-situ measurement of nitrate. At the Pioneer-New England Shelf Array (Pioneer-NES), ISUS/SUNA sensors were deployed at 7-meters depth at the Inshore (ISSM), Central (CNSM), and Offshore (OSSM) Surface Mooring locations. The SUNA sensor replaced the ISUS sensors spring 2018. The SUNA was a major improvement in technology, with significant improvements in accuracy and precision. However, it still suffers from calibration drift due to lamp fatigue and biofouling as well as spectral interference due to bromide and fluorometric CDOM. Drift is corrected by application of post-cruise calibrations to recalculate the temperature-and-salinity corrected nitrate concentration following Sakamoto (2009a) and estimating a linear drift between pre-and-post cruise deployments. Validation is performed by comparison with discrete water samples collected during deployment/recovery of the sensors. These datasets include the nitrate data from the Pioneer-NES ISSM (CP03ISSM-RID26-07-NUTNRB000.nc), CNSM (CP01CNSM-RID26-07-NUTNRB000.nc), and OSSM (CP04OSSM-RID26-07-NUTNRB000.nc) SUNA instruments spanning Spring 2018 through Fall 2022. Each dataset contains the measured nitrate, the temperature-salinity corrected nitrate, the drift-corrected nitrate, and the nitrate following validation with bottle samples. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract Sensors that use ultraviolet (UV) light absorption to measure nitrate in seawater at in situ temperatures require a correction to the calibration coefficients if the calibration and sample temperatures are not identical. This is mostly due to the bromide molecule, which absorbs more UV light as temperature increases. The current correction applied to in situ ultraviolet spectrophotometer (ISUS) and submersible ultraviolet nitrate analyzer (SUNA) nitrate sensors generally follows Sakamoto et al. (2009, Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 7, 132–143). For waters warmer than the calibration temperature, this correction model can lead to a 1–2 μmol kg−1positive bias in nitrate concentration. Here we present an updated correction model, which reduces this small but noticeable bias by at least 50%. This improved model is based on additional laboratory data and describes the temperature correction as an exponential function of wavelength and temperature difference from the calibration temperature. It is a better fit to the experimental data than the current model and the improvement is validated using two populations of nitrate profiles from Biogeochemical Argo floats navigating through tropical waters. One population is from floats equipped with ISUS sensors while the other arises from floats with SUNA sensors on board. Although this model can be applied to both ISUS and SUNA nitrate sensors, it should not be used for OPUS UV nitrate sensors at this time. This new approach is similar to that used for OPUS sensors (Nehir et al., 2021, Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 663800) with differing model coefficients. This difference suggests that there is an instrumental component to the temperature correction or that there are slight differences in experimental methodologies. 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract Sensor‐based, semicontinuous observations of water quality parameters have become critical to understanding how changes in land use, management, and rainfall‐runoff processes impact water quality at diurnal to multidecadal scales. While some commercially available water quality sensors function adequately under a range of turbidity conditions, other instruments, including those used to measure nutrient concentrations, cease to function in high turbidity waters (> 100 nephelometric turbidity units [NTU]) commonly found in large rivers, arid‐land rivers, and coastal areas. This is particularly true during storm events, when increases in turbidity are often concurrent with increases in nutrient transport. Here, we present the development and validation of a system that can affordably provide Self‐Cleaning FiLtrAtion for Water quaLity SenSors (SC‐FLAWLeSS), and enables long‐term, semicontinuous data collection in highly turbid waters. The SC‐FLAWLeSS system features a three‐step filtration process where: (1) a coarse screen at the inlet removes particles with diameter > 397 μm, (2) a settling tank precipitates and then removes particles with diameters between 10 and 397 μm, and (3) a self‐cleaning, low‐cost, hollow fiber membrane technology removes particles ≥ 0.2μm. We tested the SC‐FLAWLeSS system by measuring nitrate sensor data loss during controlled, serial sediment additions in the laboratory and validated it by monitoring soluble phosphate concentrations in the arid Rio Grande river (New Mexico, U.S.A.), at hourly sampling resolution. Our data demonstrate that the system can resolve turbidity‐related interference issues faced by in situ optical and wet chemistry sensors, even at turbidity levels > 10,000 NTU. 
    more » « less
  5. Two Lab-on-Chip sensors, one measuring nitrate + nitrite (here after nitrate) and one measuring silicic acid (here after silicate), were deployed on the Ocean Observing Initiative (OOI) Southern Ocean Array surface mooring at a depth of approximately 12m on the near surface instrument frame in the southeast Pacific Ocean (-54 N, -89W). The nitrate sensor operated as expected for the full deployment period (6/12/2018 to 19/1/2020), collecting daily measurements. The silicate sensor operated as expected for almost ten months (until 1/10/2019), collecting up to four measurements per day. The OOI surface mooring was deployed in December 2018 on research cruise DY096 and recovered in January 2020 on research cruise DY112. The sensors and associated research cruises (DY096 and DY112) were supported by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) RoSES Carbon Uptake and Seasonal Trends in Antarctic Remineralisation Depth (CUSTARD) project. This material is based upon work supported by the Ocean Observatories Initiative, which is a major facility fully funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). 
    more » « less