Abstract BackgroundCost-effective production of biofuels from lignocellulose requires the fermentation ofd-xylose. Many yeast species within and closely related to the generaSpathasporaandScheffersomyces(both of the order Serinales) natively assimilate and ferment xylose. Other species consume xylose inefficiently, leading to extracellular accumulation of xylitol. Xylitol excretion is thought to be due to the different cofactor requirements of the first two steps of xylose metabolism. Xylose reductase (XR) generally uses NADPH to reduce xylose to xylitol, while xylitol dehydrogenase (XDH) generally uses NAD+to oxidize xylitol to xylulose, creating an imbalanced redox pathway. This imbalance is thought to be particularly consequential in hypoxic or anoxic environments. ResultsWe screened the growth of xylose-fermenting yeast species in high and moderate aeration and identified both ethanol producers and xylitol producers. Selected species were further characterized for their XR and XDH cofactor preferences by enzyme assays and gene expression patterns by RNA-Seq. Our data revealed that xylose metabolism is more redox balanced in some species, but it is strongly affected by oxygen levels. Under high aeration, most species switched from ethanol production to xylitol accumulation, despite the availability of ample oxygen to accept electrons from NADH. This switch was followed by decreases in enzyme activity and the expression of genes related to xylose metabolism, suggesting that bottlenecks in xylose fermentation are not always due to cofactor preferences. Finally, we expressedXYLgenes from multipleScheffersomycesspecies in a strain ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae. RecombinantS. cerevisiaeexpressingXYL1fromScheffersomyces xylosifermentans, which encodes an XR without a cofactor preference, showed improved anaerobic growth on xylose as the primary carbon source compared toS. cerevisiaestrain expressingXYLgenes fromScheffersomyces stipitis. ConclusionCollectively, our data do not support the hypothesis that xylitol accumulation occurs primarily due to differences in cofactor preferences between xylose reductase and xylitol dehydrogenase; instead, gene expression plays a major role in response to oxygen levels. We have also identified the yeastSc. xylosifermentansas a potential source for genes that can be engineered intoS. cerevisiaeto improve xylose fermentation and biofuel production.
more »
« less
Cellulosic biofuel production using emulsified simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (eSSF) with conventional and thermotolerant yeasts
Abstract BackgroundFuture expansion of corn-derived ethanol raises concerns of sustainability and competition with the food industry. Therefore, cellulosic biofuels derived from agricultural waste and dedicated energy crops are necessary. To date, slow and incomplete saccharification as well as high enzyme costs have hindered the economic viability of cellulosic biofuels, and while approaches like simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) and the use of thermotolerant microorganisms can enhance production, further improvements are needed. Cellulosic emulsions have been shown to enhance saccharification by increasing enzyme contact with cellulose fibers. In this study, we use these emulsions to develop an emulsified SSF (eSSF) process for rapid and efficient cellulosic biofuel production and make a direct three-way comparison of ethanol production betweenS. cerevisiae,O. polymorpha, andK. marxianusin glucose and cellulosic media at different temperatures. ResultsIn this work, we show that cellulosic emulsions hydrolyze rapidly at temperatures tolerable to yeast, reaching up to 40-fold higher conversion in the first hour compared to microcrystalline cellulose (MCC). To evaluate suitable conditions for the eSSF process, we explored the upper temperature limits for the thermotolerant yeastsKluyveromyces marxianusandOgataea polymorpha, as well asSaccharomyces cerevisiae, and observed robust fermentation at up to 46, 50, and 42 °C for each yeast, respectively. We show that the eSSF process reaches high ethanol titers in short processing times, and produces close to theoretical yields at temperatures as low as 30 °C. Finally, we demonstrate the transferability of the eSSF technology to other products by producing the advanced biofuel isobutanol in a light-controlled eSSF using optogenetic regulators, resulting in up to fourfold higher titers relative to MCC SSF. ConclusionsThe eSSF process addresses the main challenges of cellulosic biofuel production by increasing saccharification rate at temperatures tolerable to yeast. The rapid hydrolysis of these emulsions at low temperatures permits fermentation using non-thermotolerant yeasts, short processing times, low enzyme loads, and makes it possible to extend the process to chemicals other than ethanol, such as isobutanol. This transferability establishes the eSSF process as a platform for the sustainable production of biofuels and chemicals as a whole.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1751840
- PAR ID:
- 10276374
- Publisher / Repository:
- Springer Science + Business Media
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Biotechnology for Biofuels
- Volume:
- 14
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 1754-6834
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Development of the bioeconomy is driven by our ability to access the energy‐rich carbon trapped in recalcitrant plant materials. Current strategies to release this carbon rely on expensive enzyme cocktails and physicochemical pretreatment, producing inhibitory compounds that hinder subsequent microbial bioproduction. Anaerobic fungi are an appealing solution as they hydrolyze crude, untreated biomass at ambient conditions into sugars that can be converted into value‐added products by partner organisms. However, some carbon is lost to anaerobic fungal fermentation products. To improve efficiency and recapture this lost carbon, we built a two‐stage bioprocessing system pairing the anaerobic fungusPiromyces indianaewith the yeastKluyveromyces marxianus, which grows on a wide range of sugars and fermentation products. In doing so we produce fine and commodity chemicals directly from untreated lignocellulose.P.indianaeefficiently hydrolyzed substrates such as corn stover and poplar to generate sugars, fermentation acids, and ethanol, whichK.marxianusconsumed while producing 2.4 g/L ethyl acetate. An engineered strain ofK.marxianuswas also able to produce 550 mg/L 2‐phenylethanol and 150 mg/L isoamyl alcohol fromP.indianaehydrolyzed lignocellulosic biomass. Despite the use of crude untreated plant material, production yields were comparable to optimized rich yeast media due to the use of all available carbon including organic acids, which formed up to 97% of free carbon in the fungal hydrolysate. This work demonstrates that anaerobic fungal pretreatment of lignocellulose can sustain the production of fine chemicals at high efficiency by partnering organisms with broad substrate versatility.more » « less
-
Dudley, Edward G (Ed.)ABSTRACT Secondary fermentation in beer can result in undesirable consequences, such as off-flavors, increased alcohol content, hyperattenuation, gushing, and the spontaneous explosion of packaging. Strains ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae var. diastaticusare a major contributor to such spoilage due to their production of extracellular glucoamylase enzyme encoded by theSTA1gene.Saccharomycesyeasts can naturally produce antifungal proteins named “killer” toxins that inhibit the growth of competing yeasts. Challenging diastatic yeasts with killer toxins revealed that 91% of strains are susceptible to the K1 killer toxin produced byS. cerevisiae. Screening of 192 killer yeasts identified novel K2 toxins that could inhibit all K1-resistant diastatic yeasts. Variant K2 killer toxins were more potent than the K1 and K2 toxins, inhibiting 95% of diastatic yeast strains tested. Brewing trials demonstrated that adding killer yeast during a simulated diastatic contamination event could prevent hyperattenuation. Currently, most craft breweries can only safeguard against diastatic yeast contamination by good hygiene and monitoring for the presence of diastatic yeasts. The detection of diastatic yeasts will often lead to the destruction of contaminated products and the aggressive decontamination of brewing facilities. Using killer yeasts in brewing offers an approach to safeguard against product loss and potentially remediate contaminated beer.IMPORTANCEThe rise of craft brewing means that more domestic beer in the marketplace is being produced in facilities lacking the means for pasteurization, which increases the risk of microbial spoilage. The most damaging spoilage yeasts are “diastatic” strains ofSaccharomyces cerevisiaethat cause increased fermentation (hyperattenuation), resulting in unpalatable flavors such as phenolic off-flavor, as well as over-carbonation that can cause exploding packaging. In the absence of a pasteurizer, there are no methods available that would avert the loss of beer due to contamination by diastatic yeasts. This manuscript has found that diastatic yeasts are sensitive to antifungal proteins named “killer toxins” produced bySaccharomycesyeasts, and in industrial-scale fermentation trials, killer yeasts can remediate diastatic yeast contamination. Using killer toxins to prevent diastatic contamination is a unique and innovative approach that could prevent lost revenue to yeast spoilage and save many breweries the time and cost of purchasing and installing a pasteurizer.more » « less
-
Abstract ‘Marginal lands’ are low productivity sites abandoned from agriculture for reasons such as low or high soil water content, challenging topography, or nutrient deficiency. To avoid competition with crop production, cellulosic bioenergy crops have been proposed for cultivation on marginal lands, however on these sites they may be more strongly affected by environmental stresses such as low soil water content. In this study we used rainout shelters to induce low soil moisture on marginal lands and determine the effect of soil water stress on switchgrass growth and the subsequent production of bioethanol. Five marginal land sites that span a latitudinal gradient in Michigan and Wisconsin were planted to switchgrass in 2013 and during the 2018–2021 growing seasons were exposed to reduced precipitation under rainout shelters in comparison to ambient precipitation. The effect of reduced precipitation was related to the environmental conditions at each site and biofuel production metrics (switchgrass biomass yields and composition and ethanol production). During the first year (2018), the rainout shelters were designed with 60% rain exclusion, which did not affect biomass yields compared to ambient conditions at any of the field sites, but decreased switchgrass fermentability at the Wisconsin Central–Hancock site. In subsequent years, the shelters were redesigned to fully exclude rainfall, which led to reduced biomass yields and inhibited fermentation for three sites. When switchgrass was grown in soils with large reductions in moisture and increases in temperature, the potential for biofuel production was significantly reduced, exposing some of the challenges associated with producing biofuels from lignocellulosic biomass grown under drought conditions.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
