An official website of the United States government
Abstract Indentation testing is the most common approach to quantify mechanical brain tissue properties. Despite a myriad of studies conducted already, reported stiffness values vary extensively and continue to be subject of study. Moreover, the growing interest in the relationship between the brain's spatially heterogeneous microstructure and local tissue stiffness warrants the development of standardized measurement protocols to enable comparability between studies and assess repeatability of reported data. Here, we present three individual protocols that outline (1) sample preparation of a 1000‐µm thick coronal slice, (2) a comprehensive list of experimental parameters associated with the FemtoTools FT‐MTA03 Micromechanical Testing System for spherical indentation, and (3) two different approaches to derive the elastic modulus from raw force‐displacement data. Lastly, we demonstrate that our protocols deliver a robust experimental framework that enables us to determine the spatially heterogeneous microstructural properties of (mouse) brain tissue. © 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Mouse brain sample preparation Basic Protocol 2: Indentation testing of mouse brain tissue using the FemtoTools FT‐MTA03 Micromechanical Testing and Assembly System Basic Protocol 3: Tissue stiffness identification from force‐displacement data
more »
« less
Preparation and Mounting of Whole Blood Clot Samples for Mechanical Testing
Abstract Studying and quantifying the mechanics of blood clots is essential to better diagnosis and prognosis of, as well as therapy for, thromboembolic pathologies such as strokes, heart attacks, and pulmonary embolisms. Unfortunately, mechanically testing blood clots is complicated by their softness and fragility, thus making the use of classic mounting techniques, such as clamping, challenging. This is particularly true for mechanical testing under large deformation. Here, we describe protocols for creating in vitro blood clots and securely mounting these samples on mechanical test equipment. To this end, we line 3D‐printed molds with a hook‐and‐loop fabric that, after coagulation, provides a secure interface between the sample and device mount. In summary, our molding and mounting protocols are ideal for performing large‐deformation mechanical testing, with samples that can withstand substantial deformation without delaminating from the apparatus. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Cube‐shaped blood clot preparation Basic Protocol 2: Sheet‐shaped blood clot preparation
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10276768
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Current Protocols
- Volume:
- 1
- Issue:
- 7
- ISSN:
- 2691-1299
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Articular cartilage is a multiphasic, anisotropic, and heterogeneous material. Although cartilage possesses excellent mechanical and biological properties, it can undergo mechanical damage, resulting in osteoarthritis. Thus, it is important to understand the microscale failure behavior of cartilage in both basic science and clinical contexts. Determining cartilage failure behavior and mechanisms provides insight for improving treatment strategies to delay osteoarthritis initiation or progression and can also enhance the value of cartilage as bioinspiration for material fabrication. To investigate microscale failure behavior, we developed a protocol to initiate fractures by applying a microindentation technique using a well‐defined tip geometry that creates localized cracks across a range of loading rates. The protocol includes extracting the tissue from the joint, preparing samples, and microfracture. Various aspects of the experiment, such as loading profile and solvent, can be adjusted to mimic physiological or pathological conditions and thereby further clarify phenomena underlying articular cartilage failure. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Harvesting and dissection of the joint surfaces Basic Protocol 2: Preparation of samples for microindentation and fatigue testing Basic Protocol 3: Microfracture using microindentation Basic Protocol 4: Crack propagation under cyclic loadingmore » « less
-
Abstract Cells in living tissues are exposed to substantial mechanical forces and constraints imposed by neighboring cells, the extracellular matrix, and external factors. Mechanical forces and physical confinement can drive various cellular responses, including changes in gene expression, cell growth, differentiation, and migration, all of which have important implications in physiological and pathological processes, such as immune cell migration or cancer metastasis. Previous studies have shown that nuclear deformation induced by 3D confinement promotes cell contractility but can also cause DNA damage and changes in chromatin organization, thereby motivating further studies in nuclear mechanobiology. In this protocol, we present a custom‐developed, easy‐to‐use, robust, and low‐cost approach to induce precisely defined physical confinement on cells using agarose pads with micropillars and externally applied weights. We validated the device by confirming nuclear deformation, changes in nuclear area, and cell viability after confinement. The device is suitable for short‐ and long‐term confinement studies and compatible with imaging of both live and fixed samples, thus presenting a versatile approach to studying the impact of 3D cell confinement and nuclear deformation on cellular function. This article contains detailed protocols for the fabrication and use of the confinement device, including live cell imaging and labeling of fixed cells for subsequent analysis. These protocols can be amended for specific applications. © 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Design and fabrication of the confinement device wafer Basic Protocol 2: Cell confinement assay Support Protocol 1: Fixation and staining of cells after confinement Support protocol 2: Live/dead staining of cells during confinementmore » « less
-
Abstract Thromboembolic diseases are a significant cause of mortality and are clinically treated enzymatically with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). Interestingly, prior studies in fibrin fibers and fibrin gels have demonstrated that thrombolysis may be mechanically sensitive. This study aims to expand mechano‐lytic studies to whole blood clots. Furthermore, this study investigates not only how mechanics impacts lysis but also how lysis impacts mechanics. Therefore, clots made from whole human blood are exposed to tPA while the clots are either stretched or unstretched. After, the resulting degree of clot lysis is measured by weighing the clots and by measuring the concentration of D‐dimer in the surrounding bath. Additionally, each clot's mechanical properties are measured. This study finds that mechanical stretch accelerates loss in clot weight but does not impact the lysis rate as measured by D‐dimer. Moreover, lysis not only removes clot volume but also reduces the remaining clot's stiffness and toughness. In summary, tPA‐induced lysis of whole clot appears mechanically insensitive, but stretch reduces clot weight. Furthermore, results show that thrombolysis weakens clot. This suggests that thrombolysis may increase the risk of secondary embolizations but may also ease clot removal during thrombectomy, for example.more » « less
-
Abstract Physical properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM) affect cell behaviors ranging from cell adhesion and migration to differentiation and gene expression, a process known as mechanotransduction. While most studies have focused on the impact of ECM stiffness, using linearly elastic materials such as polyacrylamide gels as cell culture substrates, biological tissues and ECMs are viscoelastic, which means they exhibit time‐dependent mechanical responses and dissipate mechanical energy. Recent studies have revealed ECM viscoelasticity, independent of stiffness, as a critical physical parameter regulating cellular processes. These studies have used biomaterials with tunable viscoelasticity as cell‐culture substrates, with alginate hydrogels being one of the most commonly used systems. Here, we detail the protocols for three approaches to modulating viscoelasticity in alginate hydrogels for 2D and 3D cell culture studies, as well as the testing of their mechanical properties. Viscoelasticity in alginate hydrogels can be tuned by varying the molecular weight of the alginate polymer, changing the type of crosslinker—ionic versus covalent—or by grafting short poly(ethylene‐glycol) (PEG) chains to the alginate polymer. As these approaches are based on commercially available products and simple chemistries, these protocols should be accessible for scientists in the cell biology and bioengineering communities. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Tuning viscoelasticity by varying alginate molecular weight Basic Protocol 2: Tuning viscoelasticity with ionic versus covalent crosslinking Basic Protocol 3: Tuning viscoelasticity by adding PEG spacers to alginate chains Support Protocol 1: Testing mechanical properties of alginate hydrogels Support Protocol 2: Conjugating cell‐adhesion peptide RGD to alginatemore » « less
