More Like this

1. Understanding the Potential of a Holistic Engineering Project Experience in the Advancement of the Professional Formation of Engineers

   Dey, K.; Rahman, M.T.; Pyrialakou, V. D.; Martinelli, D.; Fraustino, J. D.; Deskins, J; Roy, A. R; Rambo-Hernandez, K. (July 2021, 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference & Exposition)

   null (Ed.)

   The role of modern engineers as problem-definer often require collaborating with cross-disciplinary teams of professionals to understand and effectively integrate the role of other disciplines and accelerate innovation. To prepare future engineers for this emerging role, undergraduate engineering students should engage in collaborative and interdisciplinary activities with faculties and students from various disciplines (e.g., engineering and social science). Such cross-disciplinary experiences of undergraduate engineering students are not common in today’s university curriculum. Through a project funded by the division of Engineering Education and Centers (EEC) of the National Science Foundation (NSF), a research team of the West Virginia University developed and offered a Holistic Engineering Project Experience (HEPE) to the engineering students. Holistic engineering is an approach catering to the overall engineering profession, instead of focusing on any distinctive engineering discipline such as electrical, civil, chemical, or mechanical engineering. Holistic Engineering is based upon the fact that the traditional engineering courses do not offer sufficient non-technical skills to the engineering students to work effectively in cross-disciplinary social problems (e.g., development of transportation systems and services). The Holistic Engineering approach enables engineering students to learn non-engineering skills (e.g., strategic communication skills) beyond engineering math and sciences, which play a critical role in solving complex 21st-century engineering problems. The research team offered the HEPE course in Spring 2020 semester, where engineering students collaborated with social science students (i.e., students from economics and strategic communication disciplines) to solve a contemporary, complex, open-ended transportation engineering problem with social consequences. Social science students also received the opportunity to develop a better understanding of technical aspects in science and engineering. The open ended problem presented to the students was to “Restore and Improve Urban Infrastructure” in connection to the future deployment of connected and autonomous vehicles, which is identified as a grand challenge by the National Academy of Engineers (NAE) [1]. 

   more » « less
2. Board #444 - Professional Practice Experiences of Collegiate Rising Scholars Students—A Work-in-Progress

   Baldwin_Kan-uge, Grace L; Stwalley, Carol S; Stwalley_III, Robert M (June 2024, American Society of Engineering Education)

   The National Science Foundation established the Rising Scholars program to demonstrate how the cultivation of mentor support networks could promote the matriculation and retention of qualified low socio-economic students into STEM fields. Rising Scholars students are those individuals with low socio-economic status that have distinguished themselves academically in secondary education and wish to move into a collegiate STEM major. The overarching goal of this NSF S-STEM effort was to determine if professional-based mentors could help an individual make-up for a lack of ‘institutional’ collegiate knowledge within their own family and friends. Under this program, twenty-one incoming exploratory studies students, across three years, who had expressed an interest in engineering were provided with a defined path of social and professional activities in college, where they engaged in numerous experiential activities, including on-campus research and internships. The overall goal of this defined path was to introduce the students to potential mentors within technical fields, who might later assist the students with their own careers. Rising Scholars students were sent to the Minority Engineering Program’s Academic Boot Camp, prior to entering school as freshmen, and they were scheduled for annual seminars and continuing social events to provide group cohesiveness. While many elements of keeping the students on the designated path where they could co-mingle with potential mentors was difficult, finding paid work experience for the students was particularly challenging. COVID-19 negatively affected the ability of these students to find professional employment, but some of students truly excelled in collegiate Professional Practice. Anecdotal experiences and data from employment-based activity of the Rising Scholars program are presented. Some students from the program remain actively working toward completing college, but to-date graduation and entry-level employment data are provided. 

   more » « less
3. Holistic Engineering: A Concept Exploration in a Cross- Disciplinary Project Course Experience

   Pyrialakou, V. D.; Dey, K.; Martinelli, D.; Deskins, J.; Fraustino, J. D.; Plein, C.; Rahman, M. T.; Rambo-Hernandez, K. E.; Roy, A. (April 2020, 2020 ASEE North Central Section Conference)

   Holistic engineering is an approach to the engineering profession, rather than an engineering discipline such as civil, electrical, or mechanical engineering. It is inspired by the realization that traditional engineering does not adequately harness professional skills in its problem-solving repertoire. Holistic engineering asks engineers to look outward, beyond the fields of math and science, in search of solutions to entire problems. While engineering graduates are well prepared in the technical aspects of the engineering profession, they lack non-technical professional skills (e.g., strategic communication, social science perspective of engineering problems, and others) that can help them think through diverse social aspects posed by current complex engineering grand challenges. In this paper, we review the concept and origins of holistic engineering and we present an application of this concept in a Holistic Engineering Project Course (HEPC) developed as part of a National Science Foundation (NSF) grant. HEPC is developed in such a way that engineering students work with social science students on a complex and open-ended engineering grand challenge problem. We hypothesize that such collaborations can significantly improve the professional formation of well-rounded, and effective engineers. The paper also draws lessons learned from the first offering of the course, titled Technology Innovations: Engineering, Economics, and Public Relations, which was offered in the spring semester of 2020 in the Wadsworth Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in coordination with the John Chambers Department of Economics and the Reed College of Media in West Virginia University. 

   more » « less
4. Work in Progress: Engineers from Day One

   Ganesh, Tirupalavanam G.; Squires, Kyle D; Collofello, James; Hammond, Robin R. (June 2018, ASEE annual conference & exposition proceedings)

   This Work in Progress aims to address the broadening participation challenge in engineering. This paper will describe a complex adaptive systems approach based project aimed at enhancing entry and persistence in engineering of first-generation students, women, under-represented ethnic minorities, and those with socio-economic need. Sponsored by a national agency, the effort involves a large public comprehensive research university, a county-wide community college system, feeder high-school districts, industry collaborators, and a local foundation partner. 

   more » « less
5. Examining the “narrow” and “expansive” socio-technical imaginaries influencing college students’ collaborative reasoning about a design scenario

   Radoff, J.; Turpen, C.; Abdurrahman, F.; Chen, D.; Tomblin, D.; Agrawal, A.; Chudamani, S. (August 2022, Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN)

   Many studies show that college engineering students’ sense of ethical and social responsibility declines over the course of their college careers (Cech, 2014; Canny & Bielefeldt, 2015; Schiff et al., 2021). One reason is that many college engineering programs and courses reinforce the social-technical dualism, which treats social and macro-ethical issues as distinct from the technical work more often associated with “real” engineering. Some programs, like the Science, Technology and Society (STS) program at [institution made confidential for review], attempt to challenge this dualism by supporting the integration of social and technical considerations within students’ design work and by asking students to grapple with the complex ethics of their work. However, this program is still embedded within a department, university, and society that subscribes to harmful ideologies such as technocracy, capitalism, and meritocracy, which value efficiency, surveillance, and control. These ideologies and their associated values constrain the imagination for what is possible in design work, for instance, by relying on technological ‘quick fixes’ to address complex social problems or by propping up large corporations as innovators, without adequately grappling with the harm that these corporations might be doing. This cultural reality creates an uphill battle for educators attempting to support engineering students’ sense of social consciousness and ethical responsibility. Thus, this study attempts to understand how engineering students’ imaginations are being constrained by societal structures and ideologies and when do they “break free” from these constraints? In this paper, we present a preliminary analysis of first-year STS students collaboratively reasoning through a simulated design scenario about a small community store facing challenges related to the Covid-19 pandemic (adapted from Gupta, 2017). Using discourse and narrative analysis, we analyzed multiple focus group interviews to identify what we call “co-occurrences,” or ideas that tend to hang together in participants’ reasoning. Examining these co-occurrences provides insight into the variety of ways socio-technical imaginaries play out in students’ design thinking. 

   more » « less