An official website of the United States government
Elementary linear circuit analysis is a core competency for electrical and many other engineers. Two of the standard approaches to systematic analysis of linear circuits are nodal and mesh analysis, the latter being limited to planar circuits. Nodal and mesh analysis are related by duality and should therefore be fully symmetrical with each other. Here, the usual textbook approach to mesh analysis is argued to be deficient in that it obscures this fundamental duality and symmetry, and may thereby impede the development of intuition and the understanding of the nature of “mesh currents.” In particular, the usual distinction between “inner” and “outer” meshes (if the latter is even recognized) is argued to be meaningless, as can be seen when drawing a planar circuit on the surface of a sphere. A generalized definition of a mesh is proposed that includes both inner and outer meshes on the same footing. Selection of a reference node in nodal analysis should be paralleled by the selection of any mesh to be the reference mesh in mesh analysis, which is always selected to be the outer mesh by default in the usual approach. All branch currents are shown to the difference of two mesh currents, and the zero of all mesh currents is now arbitrary just as it is for node voltages. Use of supermeshes is sometimes obviated by the new approach, and the analysis is sometimes simplified. This new approach has been used in two sections of a linear circuit analysis course in Fall 2019, and student survey data is presented to show preference for the new method over the usual textbook method. An interactive multiple-choice tutorial describing the new method has been integrated into a step-based tutoring system for linear circuit analysis.
more »
« less
Duality as a central organizing theme in linear circuit analysis instruction
Linear circuit analysis is a complex topic in which students must use many principles to complete problems successfully, which may overload working memory and thereby impede learning. Introducing organizing principles may help students develop schemas that help reduce this burden and develop deeper conceptual understanding. The use of duality as such an organizing concept is explored in this work. To be effective, however, all the topics should be presented in a dual manner. Historically, definitions of series and parallel elements have been used that are not dual to each other, and mesh analysis has been performed in a way that is not fully dual to nodal analysis. This paper examines the research question of whether these key topics can be presented in a novel, fully dual fashion and whether students will accept and appreciate such a treatment. The revised approaches were implemented using lectures, online interactive tutorials, and step-based tutoring software exercises. Surveys using both quantitative and qualitative analysis were conducted over three semesters and showed positive reactions from 72-83% of students. These results can lead to development of a full set of instructional materials centered around duality to enable improved learning of circuit analysis.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1821628
- PAR ID:
- 10286471
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- IEEE Frontiers in Education
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Step-based tutoring consists in breaking down complicated problem-solving procedures into individual steps whose inputs can be immediately evaluated to promote effective student learning. Here, recent progress on the extension of a step-based tutoring for linear circuit analysis to cover new topics requiring complex, multi-step solution procedures is described. These topics include first and second-order transient problems solved using classical differential equation approaches. Students use an interactive circuit editor to modify the circuit appropriately for each step of the analysis, followed by writing and solving equations using methods of their choice as appropriate. Initial work on Laplace transform-based circuit analysis is also discussed. Detailed feedback is supplied at each step along with fully worked examples, supporting introductory multiple-choice tutorials and YouTube videos, and a full record of the student's work is created in a PDF document for later study and review. Further, results of a comprehensive independent evaluation involving both quantitative and qualitative analysis and users across four participating institutions are discussed. Overall, students had very favorable experiences using the step-based system across Fall 2020 and Spring 2021. At least 48% of students in the Fall 2020 semester and 60% of students in the Spring 2021 semester agreed or strongly agreed with all survey questions about positive features of the system. Those who had used the step-based system and the commercial MasteringEngineering system preferred the former by 69% to 12% margins in surveys. Instructors were further surveyed and 86% would recommend the system to others.more » « less
-
Step-based tutoring consists in breaking down complicated problem-solving procedures into individual steps whose inputs can be immediately evaluated to promote effective student learning. Here, recent progress on the extension of a step-based tutoring for linear circuit analysis to cover new topics requiring complex, multi-step solution procedures is described. These topics include first and second-order transient problems solved using classical differential equation approaches. Students use an interactive circuit editor to modify the circuit appropriately for each step of the analysis, followed by writing and solving equations using methods of their choice as appropriate. Initial work on Laplace transform-based circuit analysis is also discussed. Detailed feedback is supplied at each step along with fully worked examples, supporting introductory multiple-choice tutorials and YouTube videos, and a full record of the student's work is created in a PDF document for later study and review. Further, results of a comprehensive independent evaluation involving both quantitative and qualitative analysis and users across four participating institutions are discussed. Overall, students had very favorable experiences using the step-based system across Fall 2020 and Spring 2021. At least 48% of students in the Fall 2020 semester and 60% of students in the Spring 2021 semester agreed or strongly agreed with all survey questions about positive features of the system. Those who had used the step-based system and the commercial MasteringEngineering system preferred the former by 69% to 12% margins in surveys. Instructors were further surveyed and 86% would recommend the system to others.more » « less
-
Background: Studies of changes in engineering students’ perceptions of ethics and social responsibility over time have often resulted in mixed results or shown only small longitudinal shifts. Comparisons across different studies have been difficult due to the diverse frameworks that have been used for measurement and analysis in research on engineering ethics and have revealed major gaps between the measurement tools and instruments available to assess engineering ethics and the complexity of ethical and social responsibility constructs. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to understand how engineering students’ views of ethics and social responsibility change over the four years of their undergraduate degrees and to explore the use of reflexive principlism as an organizing framework for analyzing these changes. Design/Method: We used qualitative interviews of engineering students to explore multiple facets of their understanding of ethics and social responsibility. We interviewed 33 students in their first and fourth years of their undergraduate studies. We then inductively analyzed the pairs of interviews, using the reflexive principlism framework to formulate our findings. Results: We found that engineering students in their fourth year of studies were better able to engage in balancing across multiple ethical principles and specification of said ethical principles than they could as first year students. They most frequently referenced nonmaleficence and, to a lesser degree, beneficence as relevant ethical principles at both time points, and were much less likely to reference justice and autonomy. Conclusions: This work shows the potential of using reflexive principlism as an analytical framework to illuminate the nuanced ways that engineering students’ views of ethics and social responsibility change and develop over time. Our findings suggest reflexive principlism may also be useful as a pedagogical approach to better equip students to specify and balance all four principles when ethical situations arise.more » « less
-
Science kits have been a staple of learning for some time, but in the era of COVID-19 at-home science kits took specific prominence in educational initiatives. In this paper, we delineate how kit-based education can be paired with virtual connection technology to enhance postsecondary and career exploration. The “Content, Connection and Careers” kit-based program has been developed to enable youth to explore electrical engineering principles while connecting virtually with university students to discuss engineering courses and careers. When assembled and wired up, the kit components become linear motors that use a magnetic force to pull a bolt into a pipe when youth press a button. This follows the same working principles as a doorbell or solenoid. These kits are supported by virtual learning sessions where youth connect with university students and faculty to fully understand the educational content, connect to peers and caring adults to share their learning, and explore careers that use electrical engineering skills. To investigate the effectiveness of the program, surveys were distributed to participants to understand whether the kits were simple enough for independent learning but robust enough to encourage additional self-exploration of more difficult topics with the aid of expert scientists and other adult role models. Additionally, youth were asked if the connections made with university faculty and students was beneficial in their thinking of postsecondary options and college engagement. Over 60 elementary and middle-school aged youth participated in the project. Over 80 percent of survey respondents self-reported improved knowledge of how an electromagnetic field works and how to build a simple electromagnet. Other results showed an increased understanding of engineering careers and courses required to study electric engineering in college. Before their experience in the project, very few of the young people had ever talked to university faculty or university students about their areas of research or their journey into the fields of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). This connection was described in the surveys as what the youth liked best about the project.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- The DOI is not currently available.
