More Like this

1. Characterizing Advantages and Challenges for Students Engaging in Computational Thinking and Systems Thinking Through Model Construction

   https://doi.org/10.22318/icls2020.183  

   Eidin, E.; Bielik, T.; Touitou, I.; Bowers, J.; McIntyre, C.; Damelin, D. (June 2020, The Interdisciplinarity of the Learning Sciences, 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020)

   Gresalfi, M.; Horn, I. S. (Ed.)

   As human society advances, new scientific challenges are constantly emerging. The use of systems thinking (ST) and computational thinking (CT) can help elucidate these problems and bring us closer to a possible solution. The construction and use of models is one of the most widely used tools when trying to understand systems. In this paper, we examine four case studies of student pairs who were engaged in building and using system models in an NGSS-aligned project-based learning unit on chemical kinetics. Using a theoretical framework that describes how CT and ST practices are manifested in the modeling process we examine the progression of students’ models during their model revisions and explore strategies they employ to overcome modeling challenges they face. We discuss some suggestions to scaffold students’ progression in constructing computational system models and prepare teachers to support their students in engaging in CT and ST practices. 

   more » « less
2. Developing the systems thinking and computational thinking identification tool

   Bowers, J.; Shin, N.; Brennan, L.; Eidin, E. E.; Stephens, L.; Roderick, S. (January 2022, Proceedings of the 16th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - ICLS 2022)

   Chinn, C.; Tan, E.; Chan, C.; Kali, Y. (Ed.)

   We developed the Systems Thinking (ST) and Computational Thinking (CT) Identification Tool (ID Tool) to identify student involvement in ST and CT as they construct and revise computational models. Our ID Tool builds off the ST and CT Through Modeling Framework, emphasizing the synergistic relationship between ST and CT and demonstrating how both can be supported through computational modeling. This paper describes the process of designing and validating the ID Tool with special emphasis on the observable indicators of testing and debugging computational models. We collected 75 hours of students’ interactions with a computational modeling tool and analyzed them using the ID Tool to characterize students’ use of ST and CT when involved in modeling. The results suggest that the ID Tool has the potential to allow researchers and practitioners to identify student involvement in various aspects of ST and CT as they construct and revise computational models. 

   more » « less
3. A framework for supporting systems thinking and computational thinking through constructing models

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09590-9  

   Shin, Namsoo; Bowers, Jonathan; Roderick, Steve; McIntyre, Cynthia; Stephens, A. Lynn; Eidin, Emil; Krajcik, Joseph; Damelin, Daniel (July 2022, Instructional Science)

   Abstract We face complex global issues such as climate change that challenge our ability as humans to manage them. Models have been used as a pivotal science and engineering tool to investigate, represent, explain, and predict phenomena or solve problems that involve multi-faceted systems across many fields. To fully explain complex phenomena or solve problems using models requires both systems thinking (ST) and computational thinking (CT). This study proposes a theoretical framework that uses modeling as a way to integrate ST and CT. We developed a framework to guide the complex process of developing curriculum, learning tools, support strategies, and assessments for engaging learners in ST and CT in the context of modeling. The framework includes essential aspects of ST and CT based on selected literature, and illustrates how each modeling practice draws upon aspects of both ST and CT to support explaining phenomena and solving problems. We use computational models to show how these ST and CT aspects are manifested in modeling. 

   more » « less
4. Analyzing students’ systems thinking in-situ through screencasts in the context of computational modeling: a case study

   https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-024-00115-7  

   Bowers, Jonathan; Eidin, Emil (November 2024, Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research)

   Abstract In our interconnected world, Systems Thinking (ST) is increasingly being recognized as a key learning goal for science education to help students make sense of complex phenomena. To support students in mastering ST, educators are advocating for using computational modeling programs. However, studies suggest that students often have challenges with using ST in the context of computational modeling. While previous studies have suggested that students have challenges modeling change over time through collector and flow structures and representing iterative processes through feedback loops, most of these studies investigated student ST through pre and post tests or through interviews. As such there is a gap in the literature regarding how student ST approaches develop and change throughout a computational modeling unit. In this case study, we aimed to determine which aspects of ST students found challenging during a computational modeling unit, how their approaches to ST changed over time, and how the learning environment was supporting students with ST. Building on prior frameworks, we developed a seven-category analysis tool that enabled us to use a mixture of student discourse, writing, and screen actions to categorize seven ST behaviors in real time. Through using this semi-quantitative tool and subsequent narrative analysis, we found evidence for all seven behavior categories, but not all categories were equally represented. Meanwhile our results suggest that opportunities for students to engage in discourse with both their peers and their teacher supported them with ST. Overall, this study demonstrates how student discourse and student writing can be important evidence of ST and serve as a potential factor to evaluate ST application as part of students’ learning progression. The case study also provides evidence for the positive impact that the implementation of a social constructivist approach has in the context of constructing computational system models. 

   more » « less
5. Keeping cool with SageModeler: Engaging students in systems thinking and computational thinking through modeling

   Bowers, J. (April 2022, The science teacher)

   National Science Teachers Association (Ed.)

   We demonstrate how a chemistry unit on evaporative cooling with an embedded system modeling tool called SageModeler can help students in the critical work of exploring and understanding complex problems. The framework for scaffolding students in ST and CT through modeling can be applied to other disciplines—including climate change, ecosystems, population dynamics, forces and motion, and many other topics—in order to foster student participation in systems thinking and computational thinking through modeling. In doing so, they will build skills to help them solve complex problems of the future. 

   more » « less