Introduction Social media has created opportunities for children to gather social support online (Blackwell et al., 2016; Gonzales, 2017; Jackson, Bailey, & Foucault Welles, 2018; Khasawneh, Rogers, Bertrand, Madathil, & Gramopadhye, 2019; Ponathil, Agnisarman, Khasawneh, Narasimha, & Madathil, 2017). However, social media also has the potential to expose children and adolescents to undesirable behaviors. Research showed that social media can be used to harass, discriminate (Fritz & Gonzales, 2018), dox (Wood, Rose, & Thompson, 2018), and socially disenfranchise children (Page, Wisniewski, Knijnenburg, & Namara, 2018). Other research proposes that social media use might be correlated to the significant increase inmore »
Facial Recognition: Understanding Concerns and Privacy Attitudes Across Increasingly Diverse Deployment Scenarios
The rapid growth of facial recognition technology across ever
more diverse contexts calls for a better understanding of how
people feel about these deployments — whether they see
value in them or are concerned about their privacy, and to
what extent they have generally grown accustomed to them.
We present a qualitative analysis of data gathered as part of
a 10-day experience sampling study with 123 participants
who were presented with realistic deployment scenarios of
facial recognition as they went about their daily lives. Responses
capturing their attitudes towards these deployments
were collected both in situ and through daily evening surveys,
in which participants were asked to reflect on their experiences
and reactions. Ten follow-up interviews were conducted
to further triangulate the data from the study. Our results highlight
both the perceived benefits and concerns people express
when faced with different facial recognition deployment scenarios.
Participants reported concerns about the accuracy of
the technology, including possible bias in its analysis, privacy
concerns about the type of information being collected or
inferred, and more generally, the dragnet effect resulting from
the widespread deployment. Based on our findings, we discuss
strategies and guidelines for informing the deployment
of facial recognition, particularly focusing on ensuring that
people are given adequate levels of transparency and control.
- Award ID(s):
- 1801316
- Publication Date:
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10289280
- Journal Name:
- USENIX Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security
- Page Range or eLocation-ID:
- 246-262
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Raynal, Ann M. ; Ranney, Kenneth I. (Ed.)Most research in technologies for the Deaf community have focused on translation using either video or wearable devices. Sensor-augmented gloves have been reported to yield higher gesture recognition rates than camera-based systems; however, they cannot capture information expressed through head and body movement. Gloves are also intrusive and inhibit users in their pursuit of normal daily life, while cameras can raise concerns over privacy and are ineffective in the dark. In contrast, RF sensors are non-contact, non-invasive and do not reveal private information even if hacked. Although RF sensors are unable to measure facial expressions or hand shapes, which wouldmore »
-
The growth of technologies promising to infer emotions raises political and ethical concerns, including concerns regarding their accuracy and transparency. A marginalized perspective in these conversations is that of data subjects potentially affected by emotion recognition. Taking social media as one emotion recognition deployment context, we conducted interviews with data subjects (i.e., social media users) to investigate their notions about accuracy and transparency in emotion recognition and interrogate stated attitudes towards these notions and related folk theories. We find that data subjects see accurate inferences as uncomfortable and as threatening their agency, pointing to privacy and ambiguity as desired designmore »
-
Abstract Cameras are everywhere, and are increasingly coupled with video analytics software that can identify our face, track our mood, recognize what we are doing, and more. We present the results of a 10-day in-situ study designed to understand how people feel about these capabilities, looking both at the extent to which they expect to encounter them as part of their everyday activities and at how comfortable they are with the presence of such technologies across a range of realistic scenarios. Results indicate that while some widespread deployments are expected by many (e.g., surveillance in public spaces), others are not,more »
-
Cameras are everywhere, and are increasingly coupled with video analytics software that can identify our face, track our mood, recognize what we are doing, and more. We present the results of a 10-day in-situ study designed to understand how people feel about these capabilities, looking both at the extent to which they expect to encounter them as part of their everyday activities and at how comfortable they are with the presence of such technologies across a range of realistic scenarios. Results indicate that while some widespread deployments are expected by many (e.g., surveillance in public spaces), others are not, withmore »