 Award ID(s):
 1726723
 NSFPAR ID:
 10291936
 Editor(s):
 Sacristán, A.I.; CortésZavala, J.C.; RuizArias, P.M.
 Date Published:
 Journal Name:
 Mathematics Education Across Cultures: Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education
 Format(s):
 Medium: X
 Sponsoring Org:
 National Science Foundation
More Like this

For students to advance beyond arithmetic, they must learn how to attend to the structure of math notation. This process can be challenging due to students' lefttoright computing tendencies. Brackets are used in mathematics to indicate precedence but can also be used as superfluous cues and perceptual grouping mechanisms in instructional materials to direct students’ attention and facilitate accurate and efficient problem solving. This online study examines the impact of operator position and superfluous brackets on students’ performance solving arithmetic problems. A total of 528 students completed a baseline assessment of math knowledge, then were randomly assigned to one of six conditions that varied in the placement of higherorder operator and the presence or absence of superfluous brackets: 1) bracketsleft (e.g., (5 * 4) + 2 + 3), 2) no bracketsleft (e.g., 5 * 4 + 2 + 3), 3) bracketscenter (e.g., 2 + (5 * 4) + 3), 4) no bracketscenter (e.g., 2 + 5 * 4 + 3), 5) bracketsright (e.g., 2 + 3 + (5 * 4)), and 6) no bracketsright (e.g., 2 + 3 + 5 * 4). Participants simplified expressions in an online learning platform with the goal to “master” the content by answering three questions correctly in a row. Results showed that, on average, students were more accurate in problem solving when the higherorder operator was on the left side and less accurate when it was on the right compared to the center. There was also a main effect of the presence of brackets on mastery speed. However, interaction effects showed that these main effects were driven by the center position: superfluous brackets only improved accuracy when students solved expressions with brackets with the operator in the center. This study advances research on perceptual learning in math by revealing how operator position and presence of superfluous brackets impact students’ performance. Additionally, this research provides implications for instructors who can use perceptual cues to support students during problem solving.more » « less

For students to advance beyond arithmetic, they must learn how to attend to the structure of math notation. This process can be challenging due to students' lefttoright computing tendencies. Brackets are used in mathematics to indicate precedence but can also be used as superfluous cues and perceptual grouping mechanisms in instructional materials to direct students’ attention and facilitate accurate and efficient problem solving. This online study examines the impact of operator position and superfluous brackets on students’ performance solving arithmetic problems. A total of 528 students completed a baseline assessment of math knowledge, then were randomly assigned to one of six conditions that varied in the placement of higherorder operator and the presence or absence of superfluous brackets: [a] bracketsleft (e.g., (5 * 4) + 2 + 3), [b] no bracketsleft (e.g., 5 * 4 + 2 + 3), [c] bracketscenter (e.g., 2 + (5 * 4) + 3), [d] no bracketscenter (e.g., 2 + 5 * 4 + 3), [e] bracketsright (e.g., 2 + 3 + (5 * 4)), and [f] no bracketsright (e.g., 2 + 3 + 5 * 4). Participants simplified expressions in an online learning platform with the goal to “master” the content by answering three questions correctly in a row. Results showed that, on average, students were more accurate in problem solving when the higherorder operator was on the left side and less accurate when it was on the right compared to in the center. There was also a main effect of the presence of brackets on mastery speed. However, interaction effects showed that these main effects were driven by the center position: superfluous brackets only improved accuracy when students solved expressions with brackets with the operator in the center. This study advances research on perceptual learning in math by revealing how operator position and presence of superfluous brackets impact students’ performance. Additionally, this research provides implications for instructors who can use perceptual cues to support students during problem solving.more » « less

For 2 weeks in the summer of 2018, K12 science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) teachers ( n = 40) attended a professional development (PD) that included four sessions focused on computer science modeling with followup academic year sessions; however, overall, the teachers did not incorporate or utilize modeling means or how as the instructors intended. The purpose of the study is to examine why this occurred, and the authors looked at the teachers’ modeling discourse. Using two theories to connect to practice (terministic screens, and schema theory), the authors collected data via the surveys, interviews, and email reflections. The authors analyzed the results via coding to explore participants’ concept of models and the potential difficulties of implementing computer modeling in their classrooms. Findings show that the term model was interpreted differently by the PD’s faculty team and participants. Further, the authors found that the majority of presenters held differing theories of models than the participants. Participant concepts of models did improve slightly after the PD, but lingering model concepts caused confusion with the anticipated PD results. Conclusions include five general modeling concepts which are presented and explained. Implications are provided showcasing articulated keys for delivering PD that assists in eliminating discursive and theoretical issues. Included are considerations for STEM teacher educators, PD providers, and K12 teachers. The main study limitations include mixed K12 teaching participants, distance between participants, a selfselected population, and nongeneralizable findings based on qualitative work. Future directions are outlined.more » « less

D. Olanoff ; K. Johnson ; S. Spitzer (Ed.)Professional development (PD) that supports faculty in teaching courses for prospective secondary teachers, especially courses focused on mathematical knowledge for teaching, are largely absent from higher education, despite the need to improve instruction in these courses. This study examines a novel PD program whose structure was inspired by rehearsals (Lampert et al., 2013). We analyzed PD discussions throughout the year using an instructional triad framework, and we interpreted the PD structure using Clarke and Hollingsworth’s (2002) Interconnected Model for Professional Growth. We suggest that a rehearsalinspired pedagogy offered opportunities for faculty growth in attending to student contributions.more » « less

Abstract This paper presents the development and validation of the 17item mathematics Graduate Student Instructor Observation Protocol (GSIOP) at two universities. The development of this instrument attended to some unique needs of novice undergraduate mathematics instructors while building on an existing instrument that focused on classroom interactions particularly relevant for students’ development of conceptual understanding, called the Mathematical Classroom Observation Protocol for Practices (MCOP^{2}). Instrument validation involved content input from mathematics education researchers and upperlevel mathematics graduate student instructors at two universities, internal consistency analysis, interrater reliability analysis, and structure analyses via scree plot analysis and exploratory factor analysis. A CronbachAlpha level of 0.868 illustrated a viable level for internal consistency. Crosstabulation and correlations illustrate high level of interrater reliability for all but one item, and high levels across all subsections. Collaborating a scree plot with the exploratory factor analysis illustrated three critical groupings aligning with the factors from the MCOP^{2}(student engagement and teacher facilitation) while adding a third factor, lesson design practices. Taken collectively, these results indicate that the GSIOP measures the degree to which instructors’ and students’ actions in undergraduate mathematics classrooms align with practices recommended by the Mathematical Association of America (MAA) using a threefactor structure of teacher facilitation, student engagement, and design practices.