More Like this

1. A review of predictive policing from the perspective of fairness

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-021-09286-4  

   Alikhademi, Kiana; Drobina, Emma; Prioleau, Diandra; Richardson, Brianna; Purves, Duncan; Gilbert, Juan E. (April 2021, Artificial Intelligence and Law)

   null (Ed.)

   Machine Learning has become a popular tool in a variety of applications in criminal justice, including sentencing and policing. Media has brought attention to the possibility of predictive policing systems causing disparate impacts and exacerbating social injustices. However, there is little academic research on the importance of fairness in machine learning applications in policing. Although prior research has shown that machine learning models can handle some tasks efficiently, they are susceptible to replicating systemic bias of previous human decision-makers. While there is much research on fair machine learning in general, there is a need to investigate fair machine learning techniques as they pertain to the predictive policing. Therefore, we evaluate the existing publications in the field of fairness in machine learning and predictive policing to arrive at a set of standards for fair predictive policing. We also review the evaluations of ML applications in the area of criminal justice and potential techniques to improve these technologies going forward. We urge that the growing literature on fairness in ML be brought into conversation with the legal and social science concerns being raised about predictive policing. Lastly, in any area, including predictive policing, the pros and cons of the technology need to be evaluated holistically to determine whether and how the technology should be used in policing. 

   more » « less
2. Censored Fairness through Awareness

   https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v37i12.26708  

   Zhang, Wenbin; Hernandez-Boussard, Tina; Weiss, Jeremy (June 2023, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence)

   There has been increasing concern within the machine learning community and beyond that Artificial Intelligence (AI) faces a bias and discrimination crisis which needs AI fairness with urgency. As many have begun to work on this problem, most existing work depends on the availability of class label for the given fairness definition and algorithm which may not align with real-world usage. In this work, we study an AI fairness problem that stems from the gap between the design of a fair model in the lab and its deployment in the real-world. Specifically, we consider defining and mitigating individual unfairness amidst censorship, where the availability of class label is not always guaranteed due to censorship, which is broadly applicable in a diversity of real-world socially sensitive applications. We show that our method is able to quantify and mitigate individual unfairness in the presence of censorship across three benchmark tasks, which provides the first known results on individual fairness guarantee in analysis of censored data. 

   more » « less
3. End-to-End Learning for Fair Ranking Systems

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3485447.3512247  

   Kotary, James; Fioretto, Ferdinando; Van Hentenryck, Pascal; Zhu, Ziwei (January 2022, WWW '22: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022)

   The learning-to-rank problem aims at ranking items to maximize exposure of those most relevant to a user query. A desirable property of such ranking systems is to guarantee some notion of fairness among specified item groups. While fairness has recently been considered in the context of learning-to-rank systems, current methods cannot provide guarantees on the fairness of the predicted rankings. This paper addresses this gap and introduces Smart Predict and Optimize for Fair Ranking (SPOFR), an integrated optimization and learning framework for fairness-constrained learning to rank. The end-to-end SPOFR framework includes a constrained optimization sub-model and produces ranking policies that are guaranteed to satisfy fairness constraints, while allowing for fine control of the fairness-utility tradeoff. SPOFR is shown to significantly improve on current state-of-the-art fair learning-to-rank systems with respect to established performance metrics. 

   more » « less
4. On Improving Fairness of AI Models with Synthetic Minority Oversampling Techniques

   Zhou, Yan; Kantarcioglu, Murat; Clifton, Chris (April 2023, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics)

   Biased AI models result in unfair decisions. In response, a number of algorithmic solutions have been engineered to mitigate bias, among which the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) has been studied, to an extent. Although the SMOTE technique and its variants have great potentials to help improve fairness, there is little theoretical justification for its success. In addition, formal error and fairness bounds are not clearly given. This paper attempts to address both issues. We prove and demonstrate that synthetic data generated by oversampling underrepresented groups can mitigate algorithmic bias in AI models, while keeping the predictive errors bounded. We further compare this technique to the existing state-of-the-art fair AI techniques on five datasets using a variety of fairness metrics. We show that this approach can effectively improve fairness even when there is a significant amount of label and selection bias, regardless of the baseline AI algorithm. 

   more » « less
5. The Impact of Explanations on Fairness in Human-AI Decision-Making: Protected vs Proxy Features

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3640543.3645210  

   Goyal, Navita; Baumler, Connor; Nguyen, Tin; Daumé_III, Hal (March 2024, ACM)

   AI systems have been known to amplify biases in real-world data. Explanations may help human-AI teams address these biases for fairer decision-making. Typically, explanations focus on salient input features. If a model is biased against some protected group, explanations may include features that demonstrate this bias, but when biases are realized through proxy features, the relationship between this proxy feature and the protected one may be less clear to a human. In this work, we study the effect of the presence of protected and proxy features on participants’ perception of model fairness and their ability to improve demographic parity over an AI alone. Further, we examine how different treatments—explanations, model bias disclosure and proxy correlation disclosure—affect fairness perception and parity. We find that explanations help people detect direct but not indirect biases. Additionally, regardless of bias type, explanations tend to increase agreement with model biases. Disclosures can help mitigate this effect for indirect biases, improving both unfairness recognition and decision-making fairness. We hope that our findings can help guide further research into advancing explanations in support of fair human-AI decision-making. 

   more » « less